Chiral stationary phase brush type

The high diffusivity and low viscosity of sub- and supercritical fluids make them particularly attractive eluents for enantiomeric separations. Mourier et al. first exploited sub- and supercritical eluents for the separation of phosphine oxides on a brush-type chiral stationary phase [28]. They compared analysis time and resolution per unit time for separations performed by LC and SFC. Although selectivity (a) was comparable in LC and SFC for the compounds studied, resolution was consistently... 

Laemmerhofer, M., Lindner,W. Quinine and quinidine derivatives as chiral selectors. I. Brush type chiral stationary phases for high-performance liquid chromatography based on cinchonan carbamates and their application as chiral anion exchangers, J. Chromatogr. A, 1996, 741, 33-48. 

Lipkowitz, K.B.,Theoretical studies of brush-type chiral stationary phases,... 

A special subclass of brush-type chiral stationary phases are the ion-exchange CSPs developed by Lammerhofer and Lindner (1996). By introducing an additional ionic moiety, a strong interaction between the selector and the selectand can be achieved. The first commercial available phases are based on the Cinchona alkaloids Quinine and Quinidine with an additional weak anion-exchange function offering good separation possibilities for chiral acids. A strong dependence of the capacity from the counter ion of the mobile phase could be demonstrated by Arnell (2009). 

Slater MD, Frechet JMJ, Svec F (2009) In-column preparation of a brush-type chiral stationary phase using click chcanistry and a silica monolith. J Sep Sci 32 21-28... 

Figure 13. Schematic view of brush-type CSPs showing the chiral selector substituents oriented towards the liquid phase. Solvent molecules and the respective solvation are not shown. Stereoselective [SO-SA] interactions, attractive or repulsive, are located invariably within the heterogeneously structured chiral stationary phase.

The most successful and broadly applied chiral stationary phases comprise the cellu-lose-and amylose-based phases developed by Okamoto (Chiracel and Chiralpak) (39), brush-type phases developed by Pirkle (40),... 

Mechanistic considerations (e.g., the extensive work published on brush-type phases) or the practitioner s experience might help to select a chiral stationary phase (CSP) for initial work. Scouting for the best CSP/mobile phase combination can be automated by using automated solvent and column switching. More than 100 different CSPs have been reported in the literature to date. Stationary phases for chiral pSFC have been prepared from the chiral pool by modifying small molecules, like amino acids or alkaloids, by the deriva-tization of polymers such as carbohydrates, or by bonding of macrocycles. Also, synthetic selectors such as the brush-type ( Pirkle ) phases, helical poly(meth) acrylates, polysiloxanes and polysiloxane copolymers, and chiral selectors physically coated onto graphite surfaces have been used as stationary phases. 

Modified-C02 mobile phases excel at stereochemical separations, more often than not outperforming traditional HPLC mobile phases. For the separation of diastereomers, silica, diol-bonded silica, graphitic carbon, and chiral stationary phases have all been successfully employed. For enantiomer separations, the derivatized polysaccharide, silica-based Chiralcel and Chiralpak chiral stationary phases (CSPs) have been most used, with many applications, particularly in pharmaceutical analysis, readily found in the recent literature (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). To a lesser extent, applications employing Pirkle brush-type, cyclodextrin and antibiotic CSPs have also been described. In addi-... 

Chiral stationary phases can exist in different forms [10] (see Fig. 8). Some selectors can be used as particulate phase materials, such as polymeric cellulose triacetate. Polymeric cellulose and amylose derivatives are often coated onto silica carrier particles so that only 20% of the CSP consists of the chiral selector. This combination of stationary phase and chiral polymer combines good chromatographic properties (due to the homogeneous particle size distribution) with a high density of chiral adsorption sites in the polysaccharide derivatives. Another approach is selected for the so-called brush-type CSPs. In these, the chiral selector is covalently bound to the surface of the silica particles. These phases show high chemical inertness and allow the use of a multitude of different mobile phases. 

New brush-type phases (donor-acceptor interactions) are appearing all the time. " Examples are stationary phases comprising quinine derivatives and trichloro-dicyanophenyl-L-a-amino acids as chiral selectors. Quinine carbamates, which are suitable for the separation of acidic molecules through an ionic interaction with the basic quinine group, are also commonly used but in general they are classified with the anion-exchange type of chiral selectors (see further) because of their interaction mechanism, even though r-donor, r-acceptor properties occur. (Some separations on Pirkle-type CSPs are shown in Table 2.)... 

For example, cyclodextrins form chiral cavities which adsorb the corresponding enantiomers with different affinity while cellulose triacetate crystallizes in the form of helical substructures in which the enantiomers may be incorporated with different rates. For amino acid derived stationary phases there are two types of enantiomer differentiating interactions a brush-like hydrogen bond and dipole interaction plus a /[-complex donor or acceptor interaction with the aromatic residues in the amino acid. 

---