Selection of Instrument

The available MS instruments and analysis approaches have different capabilities in terms of quantitative analysis. Table 8.1 grades the quantitative capabilities of various ion sources and analyzers taking into account the specific requirements of the real-time MS monitoring. In general, continuous operation mass analyzers (S, Q) are expected to possess superior quantitative capabilities when compared with batch mass analyzers (IT, ICR, TOF). Coupling separation techniques to MS enhances quantitative capabilities of the technique by reducing ion suppression, contamination effects, and minimizing the effect of sample matrix variability. 

---

Ensure proper design and selection of instrumentation as per area electrical classification... 

Minimize the effect of electrical interference by the design, installation and selection of instrumented systems... 

The selection of instrumentation for a specific task is an important part of measurement planning. The instrumentation consists of measuring probes, the meters to convert the signals from the probes, and some intelligence to guide the... 

Instrument Failure assume instrument control valves freeze or fail in open position (or closed, which ever is worse), determine capacity for relief based on flows, temperatures, or pressures possible under these circumstances. The judicious selection of instrument failure sequence may eliminate or greatly reduce relief valve requirements. 

Some information relevant to the choice of appropriate methods is given in condensed form in Table 1.1, which is divided into three sections the classical techniques a selection of instrumental methods some non-destructive methods. 

After matrix removal, samples can be measured using various techniques, such as AAS, AES, ICP, etc. Traditional chemical analysis methods, involving separation and gravimetric, titrimetric or polarographic determination of the elements, are being replaced by a wide selection of instrumental methods. 

It is known that the structures present in a polymer reflect the processing variables and that they greatly influence the physical and mechanical properties. Thus, the properties of polymeric materials are influenced by their chemical composition, process history, and the resulting morphology. Morphological study usually requires two preparatory steps prior to the study itself selection of instrumental techniques and development of specimen preparation techniques. Structural observations must be correlated with the properties of the material in order to develop an understanding and applications of the material. Figure 22.1 illustrates the types of optical microscope (OM) techniques commonly used to examine polymer specimens [2]. 

Obviously, the user has a large selection of instruments, each of them having a different function. The selection depends on what the user wants to measure and for what purpose. 

After the selection of instruments required to perform calibration per SOP No. Val. 400.10, the calibration manager will procure the instruments. 

It is important also to make intelligent choices in the selection of instrumental parameters to optimize resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (see Basic Protocol 1). 

Gaining acceptance from stakeholders for the selection of instruments which can reach the preferred defined patterns, assuming that each policy/instrument has its own goals and effects... 

F. Laborda, M. J. Baxter, H. M. Crew, J. Dennis, Reduction of polyatomic interferences in inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry by selection of instrumental parameters and using an argon-nitrogen plasma effect on multi-element analyses, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 9 (1994), 727-736. 

The selection of instrumentation will be dependent on the chosen product characteristics being measured for the product form. Product characteristics can be categorized into physical structure, chemical identity, and homogeneity. The focus should be on critical process parameters affecting end product quality, although there may also be some process performance measurements. 

After selection of INTEGRAL by the ESA Science Programme Committee on 03 June 1993 as the next ESA medium-size scientific mission (M2), an Announcement of Opportunity has been issued by ESA on 01 July 1994 asking for proposals for scientific instruments and the ISDC to be provided by the science community via Principal Investigators (PPs), and for proposals for Mission Scientists. Proposals are due by 05 December 1994. After proposal evaluation and selection of instruments, ISDC and Mission Scientists (June 1995), Phase B will start 1995/1996 with a scheduled laimch date of April 2001. 

The process of choosing the type of mass spectrometer (including the sample inlet system) and operational conditions (experiments) to be undertaken to analyze a sample is based on several factors, including the molecular mass and polarity of the analyte(s) and the complexity of the sample mixture. The information sought, be it structural or quantitative (or both), also influences the selection of instrument and experimental setups. 

It is perhaps not a surprise to learn that most modem analytical instruments have their place in archaeo-metric and/or conservation research. Many techniques are used extensively to study ceramic and metallic specimens or to identify pitting, weathering crusts, inclusions, efflorescence, and corrosion products on the surface of samples taken from specimens. In addition, the homogeneity of materials of mixed composition is examined, the results of previous restorations are assessed, and the major, minor, and trace element compositions of samples are recorded. A selection of instruments commonly used in archaeology and conservation research is given below. Detailed descriptions of the instruments can be found in the relevant articles in this encyclopedia. 

Next in importance to acquiring a general background in color and instrument theory is selecting a suitable instrument. Measuring a specimen s spectral transmittance or reflectance properly requires careful selection of instrument geometry to faithfully reproduce the desired color aspect of the... 

Neither of the two approaches—Safety Cases or the use of API standards— is inherently better than the other each was designed to fit the circumstances of the industries to which it applied. Moreover, there is considerable overlap between the two approaches. For example, many Safety Cases make reference to API RP 14C because that standard provides sensible and practical guidance to do with the analysis of hazards and the selection of instrument systems. 

Requirements resulting from lower level decisions on design made for parts of the system outside the computer system, but which may affect the computer system (such as selection of instrumentation which needs software compensation or hardware filtering). 

EN 13625. (2001) Non-Destructive Testing - Leak Test Guide to the Selection of Instrumentation for the Measurement of Gas Leakage, European Standards. 

The aim of this paper is to describe the principal considerations for setting-up an electrochemical detection system for HPLC, including the determination of electroactivity of organic compounds using a novel microscale voltammetric technique, the choice of mobile phase and the selection of instrumental approaches for optimum performance. The application of electrochemical detection to several classes of less easily oxidized compounds, including sterols, nonionic surfactants and organic acids, is illustrated. 

Eand System 4, SOLO, UNO, CF series Wide selection of instruments, 120-2600°C, 2-color, spectral selection, fiber optic, telephoto lens option, modular, many accessories. SOLO is a line of 2-wire thermometers. 

Human factors may be an important aspect in the selection of instruments. The following should be considered in assessing portable instruments ... 

For the meaning of proven in use please refer to the next sub-section on selection of instruments. 

---