Secure landfills

In the past, removing metal and metalloid contaminants from soil has been impossible, and site clean-up has meant excavation and disposal in a secure landfill. An exciting new approach to this problem is phytoextraction, where plants are used to extract contaminants from the soil and harvested. Immobilization and Toxicity-Minimization. 

Xanthates are used in a froth flotation process of soils contaminated with mercury. The soil to be treated is mn through hydrocyclones, and the slurries are flocculated, dewatered, and removed to a secure landfill. The effluent water is recycled. The process is suitable for treating industrial land sites contaminated with mercury droplets (115). 

Sohd wastes are treated in a soHd waste disposal area to reduce thein volume and or toxicity prior to final disposal in a secured landfill. Combustible wastes can be incinerated in a slagging rotary kiln to reduce volume and toxicity. 

They may require pH adjustment and settling. These effluents should preferably be recycled or reused. Spent catalysts are usually sent for regeneration or disposed of in a secure landfill. Air emissions should be monitored aimually, except for nitrate acid plants, where nitrogen oxides should be monitored continuously. 

Table 1 indicates primary pollutant sources and waste modes, and Table 2 indicates the primary and secondary sources and associated pollutants. The primary sources of soil contamination include land disposal of solid waste sludge and waste-water industrial activities and leakages and spills, primarily of petroleum products. The solid waste disposal sites include dumps, landfills, sanitary landfills, and secured landfills. 

Inorganic solid wastes, particularly those containing toxic metals and toxic metal compounds, used Raney nickel, manganese dioxide, etc. should be placed in glass bottles or lined fiber drums, sealed, properly labeled, and arrangements made for disposal in a secure landfill. Used mercury is particularly pernicious and small amounts should first be amalgamated with zinc or combined with excess sulfur to solidify the material. 

Other types of solid laboratory waste including used silica gel and charcoal should also be packed, labeled, and sent for disposal in a secure landfill. 

Geomembranes are giant impermeable membranes made of (un)reinforced polymeric materials and used to stabilize earth and to secure landfills ensuring containment of hazardous or municipal wastes and their leachates. Functionalities are varied ... 

Heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide are Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous wastes and hazardous constituents (EPA 1986c) as such, they must be disposed of in secure landfills in compliance with all federal, state, and local regulations. They may also be incinerated at 1,500°F for 0.5 second for primary combustion and at 3,200 °F for 1 second for secondary combustion, with adequate scrubbing of incinerator exhaust and disposal of ash (Sittig 1985). 

The fluids can be hauled by vacuum tmcks to an approved disposal site for such wastes. There are different classes of disposal sites. If regulatory agencies require that a fluid be disposed in a hazardous waste secure landfill, the cost would be very high. 

The most desirable type of landhll, environmentally, is a secure landfill. Secure landhlls contain an underliner made of some impervious (impermeable) material that prevents leachate from draining out into the groundwater or adjoining lakes and rivers. The underliner can sometimes he some type of hard rock, such as granite. It can also be made of a synthetic material, usually an impervious, hexible plastic. 

These metal leachate limitations are extremely difficult to meet with the Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT) which is chemical stabilization technology proposed by the Federal EPA. The fact that no limit was proposed for cyanide adds uncertainty to chemical stabilization. TSD facilities do not want to put mixed wastes containing cyanides into their secure landfills which may have to be removed at a later date. Note that a 1972 U.S. silver dollar fails the TCLP test due to nickel. 

The output volume from the sludge dryer operating two shifts is 8 to 12 cu. ft per day. Approximately 30,000 lbs. of dried F006 material are shipped to a secure landfill every two months. The present cost for transportation, disposal and taxes is approximately 30,000 per year or almost 200 per ton. Several loads have been rejected either because... 

Those costs to operate the system which include additives, fuel, electricity and refractory replacements are estimated at 1500 per month, representing about 0% of the present disposition costs. More importantly, the client has been discarding over 1200 lbs. per month of nickel (at 8/lb of nickel, this is 9 00/mo.) and paying a transporter to haul it to the secure landfill. 

The need to design inherently safer plants has been expanded to encompass designing evironmentally acceptable plants. Environmentally acceptable plants generate minimum quantities of potentially hazardous wastes either as potential emissions to the environment or as materials requiring disposal. Wastes are recycled and reused where possible. If this is not possible, they may be treated to reduce or eliminate the hazard or destroyed through incineration. Disposal in a secure landfill is the final option. 

However several POPs, particularly the OCPs and dioxins, remain at low levels in the Australian environment and several remain persistent at low levels in body fats and fluids of Australians. The levels reflect the past use and persistence of OCPs in the Australian environment, contamination of the food chain and the capacity of the body to metabolise and store in body fats. The dioxins remain due to the ubiquitous nature of their sources with combustion as a major source and their persistence. Future trends are likely to mean very low-level residues in human fats of DDE, cyclodienes, HCB, HCHs and dioxins in the long term. Their rate of decline will probably depend on removing HCB from chlorinated industrial chemicals and OCPs from the environment (e.g. remediation of contaminated soils) by hazardous waste treatment methods (e.g. physical, chemical and biological degradation or fixation) or secure landfill. 

Wear nitrile rubber gloves, eye protection, and laboratory coat. Avoid breathing dust. In the fume hood, dissolve the arsenic compound in acidified boiling water (for 1 g of arsenic compound, use 100 mL of water containing 6 drops of concentrated hydrochloric acid). Add a solution of thioacetamide (for each 1 g of arsenic salt, use 0.2 g of thioacetamide in 20 mL of water). Boil the mixture for 20 minutes and then basify with 2 M sodium hydroxide (prepared by dissolving 8 g of NaOH in 100 mL of water). Filter the precipitate, dry, and package for disposal in a secure landfill site. ... 

Package Lots. Place in a separate labeled container for recycling or disposal in a secure landfill.7... 

---