Sampling phase separation

Concentration of TEOS in all these cases has been restricted up to 50 wt% with respect to the mbber. Beyond 50 wt%, all the hybrids show phase separation which may be due to higher amount of water condensate that is continuously generated and acts as nonsolvent for the mbbers. This is easily understood from the visual appearance of the samples phase-separated composites slowly turn opaque in the course of gelation. 

Figure 2. Electron micrograph of sample 5. This sample phase separated after gelation ana therefore has small and nearly spherical phase domains.

The local variation A d/d (microstrain) due to anisotropic strain in crystallites, lattice defects, and/or local compositional variations A (20) = -2A d/d tan0 [5]. Figure 3 shows the comparison of the temperature-dependent behavior of two samples of Ndo.sSro.sMnOs with nominally the same composition. This material shows giant-magnetoresistive behavior. The first sample phase separates into three coexisting macroscopic phases at low temperatures a ferromagnetic phase that is orthorhombic and exists at high temperatures (HTO),... 

An additional problem concerning T determinations is related to the fact that such measurements necessarily reflect the state of the system at a temperature substantially removed than T itself. An increasing number of systems is being found thlt display a lower consolute point and in which, therefore, depending on the thermal history of the sample, phase separation may or may not have occurred. In such instances it will be possible to observe single or double T s in binary samples of identical composition. A related bservation concerns certain binary systems whose preparative history may have included removal of a solvent by precipation from, or evaporation of, the low molecular component(s). In these cases the phase state of the polymer mixture presumably reflects the detailed path from dilute solution to solid sample. 

Unsupported liquid membrane techniques with three phases involve an aqueous sample phase separated from another aqueous phase (called as receiver phase) by a layer of organic solvent (e.g., octane). Analyte components first diffuse from the sample into the organic liquid membrane and then back-extract out of the membrane into the receiving phase. At the same time, interferences do not diffuse into the organic membrane layer but stay in the original sample phase. 

The different lubricant formulations studied show a differing mass of samples collected and a different degree of separation, i.e., some sample phases separate readily on standing, others need to be centrifuged to effect separation. 

Sample Preservation Without preservation, many solid samples are subject to changes in chemical composition due to the loss of volatile material, biodegradation, and chemical reactivity (particularly redox reactions). Samples stored at reduced temperatures are less prone to biodegradation and the loss of volatile material, but fracturing and phase separations may present problems. The loss of volatile material is minimized by ensuring that the sample completely fills its container without leaving a headspace where gases can collect. Samples collected from materials that have not been exposed to O2 are particularly susceptible to oxidation reactions. For example, the contact of air with anaerobic sediments must be prevented. 

Furthermore, the extent to which we can effect a separation depends on the distribution ratio of each species in the sample. To separate an analyte from its matrix, its distribution ratio must be significantly greater than that for all other components in the matrix. When the analyte s distribution ratio is similar to that of another species, then a separation becomes impossible. For example, let s assume that an analyte. A, and a matrix interferent, I, have distribution ratios of 5 and 0.5, respectively. In an attempt to separate the analyte from its matrix, a simple liquid-liquid extraction is carried out using equal volumes of sample and a suitable extraction solvent. Following the treatment outlined in Chapter 7, it is easy to show that a single extraction removes approximately 83% of the analyte and 33% of the interferent. Although it is possible to remove 99% of A with three extractions, 70% of I is also removed. In fact, there is no practical combination of number of extractions or volume ratio of sample and extracting phases that produce an acceptable separation of the analyte and interferent by a simple liquid-liquid extraction. 

The phenomena we discuss, phase separation and osmotic pressure, are developed with particular attention to their applications in polymer characterization. Phase separation can be used to fractionate poly disperse polymer specimens into samples in which the molecular weight distribution is more narrow. Osmostic pressure experiments can be used to provide absolute values for the number average molecular weight of a polymer. Alternative methods for both fractionation and molecular weight determination exist, but the methods discussed in this chapter occupy a place of prominence among the alternatives, both historically and in contemporary practice. 

For preparative purposes batch fractionation is often employed. Although fractional crystallization may be included in a list of batch fractionation methods, we shall consider only those methods based on the phase separation of polymer solutions fractional precipitation and coacervate extraction. The general principles for these methods were presented in the last section. In this section we shall develop these ideas more fully with the objective of obtaining a more narrow distribution of molecular weights from a polydisperse system. Note that the final product of fractionation still contains a distribution of chain lengths however, the ratio M /M is smaller than for the unfractionated sample. 

Gas chromatography, depending on the stationary phase, can be either gas—Hquid chromatography (glc) or gas—soHd chromatography (gsc). The former is the most commonly used. Separation in a gas—Hquid chromatograph arises from differential partitioning of the sample s components between the stationary Hquid phase adsorbed on a porous soHd, and the gas phase. Separation in a gas—soHd chromatograph is the result of preferential adsorption on the soHd or exclusion of materials by size. 

Samples may separate into two or more phases as they cool in the sample line precipitate, coagulate, and freeze. Laboratory sampling may result in nonrepresentative compositions. Heat tracing may be required and may not be installed on the nonroutine sample locations. 

COMPARISON OF MICROWAVE ASSISTED EXTRACTION METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF PLATINUM GROUP ELEMENTS IN SOIL SAMPLES BY ELECTROTHERMAL ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROMETRY AFTER PHASE SEPARATION-EXTRACTION... 

Solid-state C NMR techniques have been applied to the characterization of the different phases of several polybibenzoates [25,30], including P7MB, PDTMB and PTEB. The last two polymers offer the advantage of the stability of the mesophase at room temperature. The spectra corresponding to the pure mesophase of these samples only exhibited a broad component, while the spectra of the annealed samples were separated into two components crystal and noncrystal. The shapes of the mesophase and the noncrystal components are very similar, and only modest variations in the relaxation times were observed between these two components. The degree of crystallinity of these samples was determined... 

NGc, Nitrosamines, Nitramines, etc. In this technique, microgram quantities of a sample are added to a column packed with an absorbing medium or phase. Over this is maintained a flow of mobile phase (gas or liq). The sample components separate because of their relative mobility in the absorbing phase, and thus leave the column at different times (See Vol 1,... 

A sensitive determination of alkanesulfonates combines RP-HPLC with an on-line derivatization procedure using fluorescent ion pairs followed by an online sandwich-type phase separation with chloroform as the solvent. The ion pairs are detected by fluorescence. With l-cyano-[2-(2-trimethylammonio)-ethyl]benz(/)isoindole as a fluorescent cationic dye a quantification limit for anionic surfactants including alkanesulfonates of less than 1 pg/L per compound for a 2.5-L water sample is established [30,31]. 

The whole sample can be extracted where this is possible or, again, the two phases separated and both extracted by different techniques. As stated before, adsorption of the substances to be determined on the solid phase can become difficult when they are present at very low concentrations and the adsorbed material is a significant proportion of the total sample. 

---