Samples for spectrometer evaluation

The requirement to suppress the much stronger signal from elastically scattered laser light in order to observe weak Raman features becomes more problematic at low Raman shifts. As noted in Section 8.2.1, this stray light 

White Solid with Weak Raman Scattering 

A discussed in Section 5.2, the choice of laser wavelength is often governed by background fluorescence, which generally decreases at longer wavelength. Rhodamine 6G is an example of a strongly fluorescent sample when observed 

The abihty to distinguish closely spaced peaks in spectroscopy has received much attention in the classical literature, and many of the same principles apply to Raman spectroscopy. Raman does require fairly high frequency precision and resolution, since one is observing relatively small frequency shifts from a particular laser frequency (see Chapter 10 for more detail). In the context of spectrometer evaluation, it should be noted that most analytical Raman apph-cations involve liquids and solids in which Raman bandwidths are significantly greater than those in the gas phase. The narrowest linewidths encountered in most liquid and solid samples are in the range of 3 to 10 cm .  

At present, there is no agreed upon standard for resolution of Raman spectrometers. A pragmatic criterion for spectral resolution is the instrumental 

---

In this section the ideal case of vanishing reabsorption, Ke = 0, is discussed, where Fb + Ff= Ftot- A large area of the sample should be irradiated close to /to = 2/3, what is a very convenient geometry in most spectrometers, or diffusely via an integrating sphere, what is less convenient but guarantees homogeneous density of irradiation. Under these conditions Eqs. (8.27) and (8.28) are sufficiently accurate for quantitative evaluation. 

With all of its variables identified, Eq. (3.6) provides a means to evaluate the effect of sample and instrument parameters on observed signal. An additional application of Eq. (3.6) is the comparison of different spectrometers for instrumental sensitivity. Stated differently, how much signal results from a particular sample for a given laser power and measurement time Rearrangement of Eq. (3.6) and (3.9) yields (3.10), which applies to the multichannel case (6) ... 

Most of the above methods of column chromatography have been, or can be, automated. Devices are available for the automated application of samples to columns which are useful for analytical evaluation of samples, or for repeated analysis or separations to obtain larger amounts of material. The specific fractions of the effluent can be collected. Equipment for these purposes can be obtained from several of the supplier listed at the end of the HPLC section above with the corresponding websites. GC systems coupled with mass spectrometers (GC-MS) and HPLC systems coupled to mass spectrometers (LC-MS) are extremely important methods for the separation and identification of substances. These are invariably linked to a computer with internal libraries which can identify the peaks, and the libraries can be continually updated (see above). With more elaborate equipment LC-MS-MS where the peaks from the first spectrometer are further analysed by a second mass spectrometer provide a wealth of information. If not for the costs involved in GC-MS, GC-MS-MS, LC-MS and LC-MS-MS equipment, these systems would be more commonly found in analytical and research laboratories. [For further reading see Bibliography.]... 

It has always been desirable to have an analytical process for the evaluation of solvent suppression methods. One of the first attempts at quantitation was done by Peter Hore in his review of solvent suppression. However, it has been difficult to establish a method for the same reasons that solvent suppression is difficult in the first place. Each solvent behaves differently in terms of relaxation, coupling, and chemical shift (among other properties). In addition, each spectrometer has different characteristics and each user individually evaluates the quality of shimming to be used and the time available for optimizations. This makes establishing a standard sample to work on and how any pulse sequence will be evaluated challenging (to say the least). 

Absorption of electromagnetic radiation in the NIR region is caused by overtone and combination vibrations. Polyatomic molecules exhibit many overtone and combination vibrations, their spectral bands overlap and make typical NIR bands look very broad and featureless. Nevertheless, NIR spectra contain molecular information about the sample, and this information can be extracted by means of chemo-metric methods (cf Chapter 13). A prerequisite for chemometric evaluations is high quahty of the collected spectral data. Therefore, wavelength precision, resolution, photometric precision and signal-to-noise ratio are important criteria for the selection of an NIR spectrometer. 

It is possible to carry out a chromatographic separation, collect all, or selected, fractions and then, after removal of the majority of the volatile solvent, transfer the analyte to the mass spectrometer by using the conventional inlet (probe) for solid analytes. The direct coupling of the two techniques is advantageous in many respects, including the speed of analysis, the convenience, particularly for the analysis of multi-component mixtures, the reduced possibility of sample loss, the ability to carry out accurate quantitation using isotopically labelled internal standards, and the ability to carry out certain tasks, such as the evaluation of peak purity, which would not otherwise be possible. 

Reliable analytical methods are available for determination of many volatile nitrosamines at concentrations of 0.1 to 10 ppb in a variety of environmental and biological samples. Most methods employ distillation, extraction, an optional cleanup step, concentration, and final separation by gas chromatography (GC). Use of the highly specific Thermal Energy Analyzer (TEA) as a GC detector affords simplification of sample handling and cleanup without sacrifice of selectivity or sensitivity. Mass spectrometry (MS) is usually employed to confirm the identity of nitrosamines. Utilization of the mass spectrometer s capability to provide quantitative data affords additional confirmatory evidence and quantitative confirmation should be a required criterion of environmental sample analysis. Artifactual formation of nitrosamines continues to be a problem, especially at low levels (0.1 to 1 ppb), and precautions must be taken, such as addition of sulfamic acid or other nitrosation inhibitors. The efficacy of measures for prevention of artifactual nitrosamine formation should be evaluated in each type of sample examined. 

In both cases, either conventional FTIR transmission or diffuse reflection detection may be used. Because TLC and the postspectroscopic evaluation are not linked directly, few compromises have to be made with regard to the choice of the solvent system employed for separation. Chromatographic selectivity and efficiency are not influenced by the needs of the detector. The TLC plate allows the separation to be made in a different site from the laboratory where the separated analytes are evaluated. The fact that the sample is static on the plate, rather than moving with the flow of a mobile phase, also puts less demand on the spectrometer. The popularity of TLC-IR derives in part from its low cost. 

---