Sample preparation solvent extraction

Although SFE and SFC share several common features, including the use of a superaitical fluid as the solvent and similar instrumentation, their goals are quite distinct. While SFE is used mainly for the sample preparation step (extraction), SFC is employed to isolate (chr-omatography) individual compounds present in complex samples (11 -15). Both techniques can be used in two different approaches off-line, in which the analytes and the solvent are either vented after analysis (SFC) or collected (SFE), or on-line coupled with a second technique, thus providing a multidimensional approach. Off-line methods are slow and susceptible to solute losses and contamination the on-line coupled system makes possible a deaease in the detection limits, with an improvement in quantification, while the use of valves for automation results in faster and more reproducible analyses (16). The off-line... 

Table 4.15 fists the many possibilities for solid sampling for GC analysis. In general, sample preparation should be considered in close conjunction with injection. Robotic sample processors have been introduced for automatic preparation, solvent extraction and injection of samples for GC and GC-MS analyses. Usually, facilities are included for solvent, reagent, and standard additions and for derivatisation of samples. 

The study concluded that Once wash steps are optimized, samples prepared by solid phase extraction are cleaner than those prepared by protein precipitation. Samples prepared by extraction with a Multi-SPE plate resulted in lower LOQs than samples prepared by solvent precipitation. Drug recoveries were acceptable (>80%) for both the SPE and the solvent precipitation methods. Well-to-well reproducibility of samples was slightly better with extraction with a Multi-SPE plate. Evaporation and reconstitution, while more time-consuming, yield better chromatographic performance, allow analysis of lower concentration samples, and require optimization for good analyte recovery. 

In order to accelerate sample preparation, new extraction methodologies such as accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and MAE, based on the use of elevated temperature and pressure to heat the mixture sample-solvent, have been recently developed and applied for PAH extraction from meat [695] and vegetables [696-698]. Garda Falcon et al. [699] used microwave treatment with hexane to accelerate PAH extraction from freeze-dried foods. The fat extracted in this way underwent microwave assisted saponification with ethanolic KOH. Hernandez-Borges et al. [700] combined microwave-assisted hydrolysis and extraction to isolate organic pollutants from mussels, while... 

SPE is increasingly being adopted as a useful method of sample preparation where extraction into an organic solvent would have originally been employed. The reasons for this are outlined in the Keypoints box. The technique has been employed more extensively in the clean up of biological samples prior to analysis but there are increasingly useful examples of its application to the analysis of drugs in formulations. 

Different reversed phase [195,239,240], mixed mode (ion exchange and reversed phase) SPE cartridges [173,218] and online SPE column [193, 238] have been also reported for samples preparation and extraction. Some of these assays combined both PP and SPE in order to achieve an extensive sample cleanup [193, 195, 238-240], Likewise SPE, LLE provides cleaner plasma extracts than PP. Nevertheless, LLE procedure does not always provide satisfactory results with regard to extraction recovery and selectivity, especially with polar analytes and particularly in the case of multicomponent analysis such as in drug-metabolism studies, where analytes polarity varies widely. This issue was addressed by Zweigenbaum J and Henion J [235] and extraction solvent optimization, using isoamyl alcohol, to achieve acceptable extraction selectivity and recovery for polar analytes has been discussed. 

In general, the sample preparation and extraction steps of phenolic acid analysis are very critical to the final result. Solvent or solution composition, extraction temperature, extraction technology, acid, alkaline, or enzymatic hydrolysis, extraction time, and cleanup conditions are all factors that affect the recovery and profile of phenolic acids. Poor sample preparation and extraction result in unreliable outcomes, regardless of the precision of the chromatography quantification method. Table 3.1 lists various sample extraction methods for different types of samples. 

As a rule, chemical methods used in the examination of writing materials require initial preparation of a sample for study. Paper chromatography, thin-layer chromatography and capillary electrophoresis are experimental techniques often applied. These methods lead primarily to separation of the dyes contained in the ink under examination and to the discrimination of ink samples. The techniques are simple to use, require a small amount of sample for examination, are selective and give reproducible results. Their basic disadvantage, however, is the necessity to isolate the ink from the substrate (e.g. paper) on which the examined document has been prepared. Solvent extraction of the ink often leads to partial damage of the document. 

The results from these two experiments (kinetic and thermodynamic) will show whether the regular extraction procedure is complete or not. Most hkely, for modified-release drug products, time is essential (higher recovery over time, but watch out for solution stabihty ). The change in volume will have an impact if the solubihty of an API is on the border of the solubility limit in that particular sample preparation solvent (in the presence of excipients). If the latter is the case, then the procedure should be modified to extract with higher volume of sample preparation solvent and/or change the pH or composition of the solvent. 

A dominant trend in sample preparation and extraction is miniaturization and for more than a decade now various solventless or solvent-reduced extraction methods based on a micro scale approach have been developed. 

SAMPLE PREPARATION SOLVENT AND SOLID-PHASE EXTRACTION... 

The thermal desorption must take place at a temperature below the decomposition point of other materials in the sample matrix. Solid materials should have a high surface area (e.g., powders, granules, flbers). Bulk materials are ground with a coolant such as solid carbon dioxide prior to weighing. This technique simplifies sample preparation and avoids the necessity of dissolving samples or solvent extraction. Thermal desorption is well suited for dry or homogeneous samples such as polymers, waxes, powders, pharmaceutical preparations, solid foods, cosmetics, ointments, and creams. There is essentially no sample preparation required. 

Sample Preparation Technique Extraction Time (mins) Selectivity Multi-step On-line Possibility Solvent Consumption... 

Lipid transitions in the skin have been studied by Guia et al. [2] using DSC experiments on fractionated skin samples and solvent extracts. Three major transitions were observed in all samples at 65, 80 and 95 °C as shown in Figure 2, while a small peak (not observed in all samples) is seen at 35 °C. When these samples were cooled and reheated, the transitions at 35 and 65 °C remained unchanged and the peak at 95 °C disappeared, while the peak at 80 C was decreased in size and shifted to a lower temperature. To explain these observations, fractionated samples and samples extracted using solvents were studied. On extraction, all transitions below 90°C disappeared, while the transition at 95 C remained in the extracted sample. On concentration of the extracts, a peak remained at 65 C [2]. When homy cell membranes are prepared from the stratum comeum, the thermal profile shows 2 peaks at 65 and 75 °C (as shown in Figure 3), while a reheat of this sample shows a peak at 65 C and a minor peak at 70 C. 

Sample preparation and extraction methods are critical since they can lead to destruction and/or incomplete extraction of lipids. For example, using acid digestions or nontoxic solvent extractions instead of proven methods with chlorinated solvents should be carefully investigated to ensure quantitative extraction. 

Solvents used during sample preparation or extraction may contain contaminants that can alter subsequent TLC results. Solvents can be evaporated to small volumes and then spotted or streaked on a TLC plate to check their purity. 

As a first requirement, the sample analyzed should represent as closely as possible the lipid composition of the whole matrix from which it was taken furthermore, sample preparation should be carried out in such an environment as to minimize any changes in lipid properties prior to analysis. In food analysis, proper sampling of the lipid fraction requires knowledge of the physical structure and location of the major lipids in the sample, and the choice of the most adequate procedure depends on the t)q)e of food being analyzed, the nature of the lipid fraction, as well as the analytical procedure applied for the extraction. Foods consisting almost entirely of lipids, such as vegetable oils, often require little, if any, sample preparation prior to analysis. Qn the other hand, for more complex foods, such as meat or milk, extraction and purification of the lipid fraction is necessary prior to analysis. Official methods have been developed, which recommend the sample preparation and extraction procedures to be followed for a specific t)q5e of food. Solvent extraction methods are usually used, to separate lipids from water-soluble food components, prior to chromatographic analysis these are described in the sections that follow. A number of steps are usually required, prior to the solvent xtraction of lipids from a matrix ... 

---