Sample preparation biological materials

Different analytical techniques have been developed to extract and measure iodine concentration from the soil. The reduction of Ce (IV) by As (m) catalyzed by iodine can be used to determine the low concentration of iodine in plant and soil samples. The sample preparation requires a specialized combustion apparatus and trapping systems for iodine. For plant samples and biological materials, halogen extraction using TMAH under mild conditions has proved to be effective (Knapp et al., 1998). 

In the preparation of samples from biological materials, the time between sampling and analysis should be kept as short as possible. For storage times of a few (2 or 3) days, refrigeration at 4°C may be adequate. In favorable cases, holding times can be prolonged by the addition of chemical preservatives (e.g., formalin (formaldehyde, HCHO) and alcohol). Dehydration (by drying, combustion, and lyophili-zation) is also used. 

Assay Medium. For all samples of biologic material to be assayed the broth described above for the preparation of the inoculum may be used< English et al. (5) suggest the addition of 25% pooled human serum to the formulation of the medium when it is to be used for the assay of serum samples only. In this way, the error (29) which might be introduced by varying serum concentrations in the test is minimized. 

The infonuation that can be extracted from inorganic samples depends mainly on tlie electron beam/specimen interaction and instrumental parameters [1], in contrast to organic and biological materials, where it depends strongly on specimen preparation. 

Zeisler R, Wise SA (1985) Quality assurance and protocols in sampling and sample preparation of biological samples. In Wolf WR, ed. Biological Reference Materials Availability, Uses and Need for Validation of Nutrient Measurement, pp. 257-279. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 

Table II. Several of the reactions outlined in Table II were discussed under the chemical reactions of DFDT. In general, the DFDT analogs listed here were prepared in the laboratory for the purpose of producing a sample of the material for biological testing rather than to study the several reactions involved or to improve the yields. The latter were usually omitted in the literature.

Sample preparation used to extract proteins from cells prior to analysis is an important step that can have an effect on the accuracy and reproducibility of the results. Proteins isolated from bacterial cells will have co-extracted contaminants such as lipids, polysaccharides, and nucleic acids. In addition various organic salts, buffers, detergents, surfactants, and preservatives may have been added to aid in protein extraction or to retain enzymatic or biological activity of the proteins. The presence of these extraneous materials can significantly impede or affect the reproducibility of analysis if they are not removed prior to analysis. 

Biological material in a polythene bag filled with oxygen and being prepared for analytical combustion exploded. Diethyl ether used to anaesthetise the experimental animal from which the sample was derived may have still been present, and ignition from static charge on the plastics bag may have been involved. 

Thanks to the pioneering works of many research groups, solid-state NMR is now a well established spectroscopy for the study of biological solids, particularly for those with inherent structural disorder such as amyloid fibrils. We have provided an overview of a rather complete set of NMR techniques which have developed for samples prepared by chemical synthesis or protein expression. There are many different ways to present the materials discussed in this review. We hope that the way we have chosen can give a snapshot of some facets of the very exciting discipline of biological solid-state NMR spectroscopy. In spite of the success of solid-state NMR as a tool in biological study, it is not yet a mature technique and there is much room for further development. Below we will speculate on a few possibilities from our own perspective. 

A method for sample preparation allows determination of total tin and tributyltin ions in biological materials. End analysis by ETAAS, using a tungstate-treated graphite tube, allows LOD for tributyltin Sn of 0.4 ng/g79. An alternative method for sea water uses in situ concentration of Sn hydrides on a zirconium-coated graphite tube, followed by ETAAS absolute LOD 20 and 14 pg for tributyltin ion and total Sn, respectively, with corresponding RSD of 5.6 and 3.4%80. 

Techniques for analysis of different mercury species in biological samples and abiotic materials include atomic absorption, cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry, gas-liquid chromatography with electron capture detection, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (Lansens etal. 1991 Schintu etal. 1992 Porcella etal. 1995). Methylmercury concentrations in marine biological tissues are detected at concentrations as low as 10 pg Hg/kg tissue using graphite furnace sample preparation techniques and atomic absorption spectrometry (Schintu et al. 1992). 

Over thirty different elements have been determined in medical and biological materials by atomic absorption spectroscopy. The popularity of the technique is due to a number of factors, including sensitivity, selectivity, and ease of sample preparation. With biological fluids, often no preparation at all is required. The techniques employed usually involve simple dilution of the sample with water or with an appropriate reagent to eliminate interference. Alternatively, the element to be determined is separated by solvent extraction. Either an untreated sample, a protein free filtrate, or an ashed sample is extracted. 

Both microwave closed-vessel dissolution and laboratory robotics are relatively new to the analytical laboratory. However, it is this marriage of new methods which provides useful combinations of flexible laboratory automation to meet a variety of individualized needs. Because of the large number of biological samples which are prepared for analysis each day, it is reasonable to assume that this type of innovative automation wiU be of great benefit. It should be evaluated for its ability to improve the preparation technology for trace element analysis of biological materials. 

Preparation of an environmental sample for delivery to the sensor and the sample cleanup afterwards are often the rate-limiting steps in the detection of biological agents, as well. Even for biodetection, sample preparation is a chemistry and materials science issue, currently accomplished using membranes and surface-active chemistries, binders, and ligands. Biological sample preparation remains an embryonic field. 

---