Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Sample cleanup activity

Packing materials for column chromatography. Adequate cleanup can be achieved with alumina instead of silica gel. Activated carbon is not suitable for sample cleanup of ripe orange and leaf. [Pg.1293]

Prepared from sodium silicate using the sol-gel procedure. Silica gel is the most widely used general purpose adsorbent for sample cleanup although it may irreversibly bind some strongly basic substances. Generally considered to be slightly acidic in character but this may vary with the method of prq ration. Activated by heating at about 180 C for 8-12 hours. [Pg.392]

Preparation of an environmental sample for delivery to the sensor and the sample cleanup afterwards are often the rate-limiting steps in the detection of biological agents, as well. Even for biodetection, sample preparation is a chemistry and materials science issue, currently accomplished using membranes and surface-active chemistries, binders, and ligands. Biological sample preparation remains an embryonic field. [Pg.24]

There is an urgent need to evaluate the analytical procedures in current use, not only with respect to the reagents, instrumental costs, and analytical parameters, but also in the context of their adverse effect on the environment. The continual development of new solventless sample preparation methods is a good example of activities in this field. Indeed, recent years have witnessed particularly rapid progress in the development of these techniques,36 37 which provide higher yields, better sample cleanup, cost effectiveness and chemist safety, and are also less harmful to the environment. [Pg.356]

Two representative examples of SMGPC separations are presented in Figures 5-40 and 5-41. The sample in Figure 5-40 was a rodent bait in which the active ingredient, warfarin, was to be determined. Quantitation of this component by SMGPC (15) was as reliable as the commonly used reverse-phase method (17), with the advantage of essentially eliminating sample cleanup because the extract was filtered and injected directly onto the GPC column. [Pg.183]

Air Monitoring - An air sampling network for worker protection and general population exposure Is established as part of cleanup activities. The network collects samples for the Identification of total suspended solids and dioxin. [Pg.219]

A microcolumn packed with 3 g of activated silica gel is used for sample cleanup and fractionation. An aliquot of the extract (containing about 20 mg oil or TSEM) is then transferred to the silica gel cleanup column to remove polar components and other interferences. The column is eluted first with hexane, which recovers samrated hydrocarbons as Fraction 1 (FI). The mixture of hexane/DCM or hexane/benzene (1 1, v v) is used to elute the aromatic compounds as Fraction 2 (F2). Half of FI and half of F2 are combined into the Fraction 3 (F3). These three fractions are concentrated to appropriate volume (0.5 to 1.0 ml) by nitrogen purge. The quantitation internal standards are 5-a-androstane, di4-terphyl, and C30 17(3(H), 21(3(H)-hopane. The Fraction 3 is analyzed for quantitation of the TPH and the UCM by GC-FID. The Fraction 1 is analyzed for determination of n-alkanes by GC-FID and biomarker terpanes and steranes by GC-MS. The Fraction 2 is analyzed for the determination of alkylated PAH homologues and other EPA priority unsubstantiated PAHs by GC-MS. [Pg.1043]

Any persons wishing to sample, cleanup, or dispose of PCB remediation waste in a manner other than pursuant to the self-implementation procedure or the performance-based option must apply in writing to the EPA Regional Administrator in the region where the cleanup activities will take place, or to the Director of the Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, should the application involve more than one site in multiple regions. EPA will issue a written decision on each application, approving the application if it finds that the proposed method will not pose an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment. ... [Pg.373]

PFAAs differ from more traditional lipophillic POPs (i.e., PAHs, PCBs, and chlorinated pesticides) in that bioconcentration occurs through association with proteins rather than adipose tissue [183]. As a consequence, higher PFAA levels are expected for protein-rich tissues, such as blood and liver [184]. As with other POPs, bioconcentration is more significant for organisms that are elevated in the food web. Analysis of biota is somewhat more challenging than for aqueous samples, due to increased sample matrix complexity. The development of methods for sample cleanup and PFAA concentration remains a topic of active study. [Pg.368]

Figure 4 shows the remaining enzyme activities measured in all three experiments. Despite the different levels of inhibition, all experiments show the successful detection of sarin with respect to a drop in absorbance. Experiment 2 shows clearly that the sample cleanup absorbent packed in the device was effective in removing the Fluoride ions, and more then 50% of the immobihzed enzyme was inhibited. The results show that on-chip sample preparation was even better than the conventional process outside the LOC device. [Pg.306]

A survey of Big Trees Park was conducted in 1998 after soil samples taken in the park in 1993 and 1995 revealed higher-than-expected concentrations of plutonium (LLNL 1999). Big Trees Park is a public park in the city of Livermore, California located about one-half mile from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). The pattern of241 Am distribution was the same as that for plutonium with levels significantly higher inside ornamental tree wells than outside the wells or at depths. Activity levels were well below EPA s residential preliminary remediation goal of 2.5 pCi/g (93 mBq/g) which may have necessitated cleanup. The source of the contamination was most likely sewage sludge from LLNL that was applied to the ornamental trees in the park. [Pg.172]

During remediation, contaminant levels decrease until they achieve an asymptotic level. Once asymptotic conditions are reached for several successive sampling periods, continuing remediation activities generally result in little further decrease in contaminant reduction. However, frequently when active remediation is halted, levels of dissolved contaminants abruptly increase (rebound). This increase is the result of the diffusion into solution of contaminants that were previously adsorbed onto the surface of the aquifer media. Sometimes more efficient cleanup is achieved by operating the remediation system on a cycle of several days on and several days off. Cyclic operation allows the operator to time the remediation to treatment of the higher rebound concentrations. [Pg.287]

EROD activity is measured in the H411E cells as follows. The cells are seeded at 7,000 cells per well in 250 xL of Dulbecco s modified Eagles culture media (Tillitt et al., 1991). After an initial incubation period of 24 hours, the cells are dosed with 5 xL volumes of eiuiched SPMD extracts (cleanup of extracts generally includes dialysis and size exclusion chromatography [SEC]) and incubated for an additional 72 hours. Sample dose is typically expressed as g-equivalents triolein or whole SPMD per mg cellular protein. Multiple exposures are performed at each of six (typically) sample concentrations, using a dilution series. Afterwards, the microtiter plates are washed three times with distilled water to lyse the cells. EROD activity (pmol mg cellular protein per min) in each sample is measured... [Pg.127]

While GC has not been used extensively to analyze polyamines, a review in 2002 comprehensively covers useful methods (Teti et al., 2002) and a review in 2001 includes specific methods for various polyamines that are used to monitor cancer remission (Khuhawar and Qureshi, 2001). Using activated Permutit for cleanup and heptafluorobutyric anhydride for derivatization, sensitivities of 0.02-0.1 pmol were achieved for commonly analyzed polyamines using GC-ECD and human plasma samples (Teti et al., 2002). NPD also has utility because low detection limits are easily attained (Teti et al., 2002). PFB derivatives have shown some utility with GC-ECD (Coutts and Baker, 1982 Clements et al., 2004), and heptafluorobutryic anhydride with GC-ECD has also been used with success for analysis in human blood samples (Fujihara et al., 1983). [Pg.9]

The postclosure survey report should fully and completely document all activities and all results (data), and it should certify that the closure has been done in compliance with the work plan and all applicable laws and regulations. A professional engineer licensed in the state where the closure was done must attest to the report. (In the case of JACADS, the state is California, where the EPA Region IX office is located.) Appendix E provides two sample tables of contents from industrial RCRA closure survey reports accepted by EPA they can be used as a guide to the contents of the final and interim reports required. Box E-1 shows the table of contents for a final facility RFI postclosure report. Box E-2 shows the table of contents for an interim remedial measures report, used to obtain EPA conditional approval for the cleanup of specific areas prior to final facility closeout. [Pg.54]


See other pages where Sample cleanup activity is mentioned: [Pg.281]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.624]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.665]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.1165]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.630]    [Pg.710]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.4354]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.671]    [Pg.822]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.1253]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.535]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.774 ]




SEARCH



Active sampling

Cleanup

Sample cleanup

© 2024 chempedia.info