Safety human health

Whether the mentioned needs in our production systems can be met by organic agriculture is still unknown and under discussions. This article is a review of some of the current state of knowledge regarding ecological, environmental, food safety, human health and quality aspects of organic agriculture. 

With advent of new technologies, the growing needs of the consumer in the wake of health and hygiene can be fulfilled without compromising the issues related to safety, human health and environment. Taping new potential antimierobial substances, such as, Chitosan from nature can considerably minimise the imdesirable activities of the antimicrobial products. 

Decommissioning is often a complex and risky operation. The five key considerations are the potential impact on the environment, potential impact on human health and safety, technical feasibility, costs of the plan, and public acceptability. 

D. V. Sweet, Kegisty of Toxic Tffects of Chemical Substances, 1986 ed., U.S. Dept, of Health and Human Services, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio. 

Several studies on FWAs have concluded that diarninostilbenedisulfonic acid/cyanuric chloride (DAS/CC) and distyrylbiphenyl (DSBP) type whiteners are of a low order of toxicity. Thek safety has been extensively reviewed by governmental agencies there is no evidence of human health ha2ards. FWA producers and users consider these products to be both safe and beneficial to the ultimate consumer. This view is supported by appropriate trade associations. A comprehensive review of available safety and environmental data has been pubflshed (82). In addition, principal suppHers are conducting life cycle analyses on the primary whiteners in use (ca 1993). 

The two main federal agencies involved in the protection of human health and the environment are the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). EPA s principal concern is the protection of the environment, in most cases, the area outside of an industrial faciUty. There are 10 regional offices that carry out the regulatory functions of the agency (Table 1). Primary laws covered by EPA are the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA), the Clean Water Act (CWA), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and LiabiUty Act (CERCLA), Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), and Eederal Insecticide, Eungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). 

The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), under the Department of Health and Human Services, works with OSHA. It is NIOSH s responsibihty to determine safe exposure limits for chemical substances and to recommend to OSHA that these limits be adopted as standards. 

To further improve the general safety standards, the Delaney Clause was included in the Pood Additives Amendment of 1958. The Delaney Clause states that no food additive or color additive can be deemed safe if it has been found to induce cancer when ingested by humans or animals (23). The Clause acts as an absolute prohibition on the use of any additive found to cause cancer without any regard for whether, or to what extent, the substance is hazardous to human health. As scientific advances continue, both in the realm of food technology and analysis of previously undetected contaminants, the... 

When it approved the New Animal Drug AppHcation (NADA) of formalin, FDA ruled that use of formalin for fisheries was safe for humans and the environment. They ruled that effluents from fish treatments at 250 mg/L should be diluted 10 times and from egg treatments 75 times if 1,000 —2,000 mg/L were used (10,11). Before registering the compound, FDA also addressed carcinogenicity by stating it was not concerned about human exposure from either water or fish treated with formalin. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has procedural guidelines that should protect workers from harm fill levels of formalin. Calculations based on treatment levels demonstrated that a fishery worker is exposed to not more than 0.117 mg/L formalin in the air, well below the levels estabUshed by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration to protect workers. 

Eegistry ofToxicEffects of Chemical Substances Vol. 2, National Institute foi Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Depaitment of Health and Human Seivices, Washiagton, D.C., 1987, p. 1475. 

Does your company have a documented product stewardship policy, or a health, safety and environmental policy which incorporates the management of chemicals through their total life cycle, thus minimizing adverse effects on human health and well-being and on the environment If so please attach. ... 

The information in this book is collected from published and unpublished literature. Responsibility for the accuracy of this material is disclaimed, however, responsibility is accepted for the selection, organization, and presentation. The vastness of the information necessitates selectivity in the attempt to make a comprehensive and cohesive presentation. The material is selected to illustrate a procedure or principle not advocacy. Every effort toward objectivity was made to balance human health and safety, environment, economic welfare, and civilization. 

NIOSH/OSHA Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, U.S. Department of Healtli and Human Services, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health Publication No. 78-210, 1995, NIOSH, Cincimiati, OH. 

R. L. Talken and R. J. Lewis, Ed.. Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS.), 1981-1982 ed, 3 vois.. NIOSH Contract No. 218-81-8101, U.S. DepcUlment of Healtli and Human Services, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Publication No. 83-107, NIOSH, Cinciimati, OH, June 1983. 

The extent of cleanup that is necessary to protect human health and welfare aries with different use ctitegories. Residential development is probably the most sensiti e type of land use because of the long-term and multiple e.xposure routes and because of potential e.xposure to the most sensitive population segments (e.g., children and elderly persons). E.xcavation and removal appears to be the remedial tiction alternative selected at most sites where there is redevelopment. This is because no one can guaratitee tliat a site is stife (i.e., offers zero risk) unless all contaminants are removed. Neitlier a developer nor a municipality can accept responsibility for site safety as long as haznrdous materials remain there. In situ treatment approtiches are seldom iewed is the best option because they are unproven and because 100% detoxification or stabilization caimot be achieved. 

N.B. Hanes, and A.M. Rossignol, Comprehensive Occupational Safety and Health Engineering Aeadcmic Program Development Strategy, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Springfield, VA Nat. Tech. Info. PB 86-226453, 1984. 

The EPA sets two kinds of national ambient air quality standards. The primary standard is set at a level intended to protect human health with an adequate margin of safety. The secondary standard, usually less stringent, is set based on protecting the public welfare, which can include factors other than health impacts, such as reduced visibility, atid damage to crops. 

---