Safety considerations risk factors

Mineral exploration, by nature is a high risk activity. The safety consideration, risk assessment and risk mitigation plans are paramount for successful exploration portfolio management. Some of the key factors and consideration for safe and smooth drilling activity are the following ... 

The selection of performance impairment test systems should also include a thorough consideration of the reliability and validity of the systems. Reliability refers to the consistency of results on the test across repeated testing, and validity refers to the effectiveness with which the test accomplishes its intended purpose, be that identification of the effects of risk factors or the detection of individuals who are at risk for reduced safety and/or productivity in the workplace. 

Assessments of causality of, and risk factor for, death, other SAEs, and other significant AEs is frequently complicated by the fact that these events are uncommon in most clinical development programs. Thus consideration of related events as a group may be of critical importance in understand-ing the safety profile of a drug candidate. In addition, summarizing AEs by organ system or syndrome is often useful so that AEs may be considered in the content of potentially related experiences, including laboratory abnormalities. 

Experience has shown that satisfactory fabrication shop safety considerations must include at least the following (1) a technical determination of risks, (2) an understanding of the engineering factors related to machine failure, (3) training of workers, (4) safeguarding of hazards, and (5) an effective safety program. 

In the CPI, maintenance is one of the quality criteria in operational safety and involves the impact of corrosion on the service life of components, on plant productivity, and on maintenance strategies. Figure 3 shows how component exploitation and risk factors are affected by three different maintenance strategies, and the maintenance actions that result from these strategies. To be able to influence maintenance costs, the goals and objectives must be guided by pragmatic considerations of plant operation. 

Some variants of the LOPA methodology determine the harm more precisely in terms of harm caused to people and harm to the environment. This approach, which is required by the tolerability of risk framework for human safety. Reducing risks, protecting people, requires consideration of additional factors such as the probability of ignition, the performance of containment systems, and the probability of fatality. For a similar perspective of environmental issues assessors should consult the relevant Environment Agency sector BAT guidance. All of these factors may be subject to considerable uncertainty, and the way the LOPA is carried out needs to reflect this uncertainty. Uncertainties are present in all calculations but sensitivity analysis can be used to help understand the uncertainty. 

The risk-informed approach aims to integrate in a systematic manner quantitative and qualitative, deterministic and probabilistic safety considerations to obtain a balanced decision. In particular, there is explicit consideration of both the chances of events and their potential consequences together with such factors as good engineering practice and sound managerial arrangements. The basic components of risk, chances of occurrence and consequence, are based on sound knowledge or data from experience, or derived from a formal, structured analysis such as a PSA. 

The concept and reality of risk has been around for some time. There are many different types of risk, such as safety risk, hazard risk, mishap risk, schedule risk, cost risk, investment risk, product risk, and sports risk. Risk also involves many contending factors, such as perceived risk, real risk, individual risk, group risk, societal risk, high risk takers, low risk takers, and risk aversion. On the surface, risk appears to be a very simple concept however, risk can easily become very complex due to all the types, factors, possibilities, and considerations involved. Risk and risk management are not just safety concepts. Risk analysis and risk management are used in many different fields, such as finance, project management, and health care, just to name a few. Risk is not about the present, it is about the future. Risk deals with uncertainty and outcomes. 

A company produced bromine in Arkansas and brominated compounds in New Jersey. A risk assessment resulted in a recommendation to consider the transfer of the bromination processes to the bromine production site in Arkansas. Economics and the decrease in risk justified such a transfer and it was done. Although safety was not the only consideration, it was an important factor in this decision. 

In risk characterization, step four, the human exposure situation is compared to the toxicity data from animal studies, and often a safety -margin approach is utilized. The safety margin is based on a knowledge of uncertainties and individual variation in sensitivity of animals and humans to the effects of chemical compounds. Usually one assumes that humans are more sensitive than experimental animals to the effects of chemicals. For this reason, a safety margin is often used. This margin contains two factors, differences in biotransformation within a species (human), usually 10, and differences in the sensitivity between species (e.g., rat vs. human), usually also 10. The safety factor which takes into consideration interindividual differences within the human population predominately indicates differences in biotransformation, but sensitivity to effects of chemicals is also taken into consideration (e.g., safety faaor of 4 for biotransformation and 2.5 for sensitivity 4 x 2.5 = 10). For example, if the lowest dose that does not cause any toxicity to rodents, rats, or mice, i.e., the no-ob-servable-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) is 100 mg/kg, this dose is divided by the safety factor of 100. The safe dose level for humans would be then 1 mg/kg. Occasionally, a NOAEL is not found, and one has to use the lowest-observable-adverse-effect level (LOAEL) in safety assessment. In this situation, often an additional un-... 

---