Risk assessment results

A company produced bromine in Arkansas and brominated compounds in New Jersey. A risk assessment resulted in a recommendation to consider the transfer of the bromination processes to the bromine production site in Arkansas. Economics and the decrease in risk justified such a transfer and it was done. Although safety was not the only consideration, it was an important factor in this decision. 

Cauley JA, Martino S, Barrett-Connor E et al. (2004) Effect of raloxifene on invasive breast cancer incidence in postmenopausal women stratified by Gail risk assessment results of the Continuing Outcomes Relevant to Evista (CORE) trial. Abstract 1018. American Society of Clinical Oncology... 

The quartet of risk assessment chapters is followed by a look at the risk management practices of regulators and the ways in which risk assessment results are used. As is expected, the concluding chapter looks to the future. 

But while recognizing these limitations in our laws and the imperfections of our regulatory institutions, let us now move on to the specific risk management approaches that are applied to the many sources of risk. As mentioned earlier, these brief reviews are of limited scope and emphasize only the various ways in which risk assessment results figure in risk management decisions. 

Carmichael, N.G., H. Enzmann, I. Pate, and F. Waechter, 1997. The significance of mouse hver tumor formation for carcinogenic risk assessment results and conclusions from a survey of ten years of testing by the agrochemical industry. Environ. Health Perspect. 105 1196-1203. 

Step 2 Identifying the issues that would require attention due to their influence on risk assessment results Step 3 Identifying possible extrapolation methods... 

Although the advice is given mainly for the description of risk assessment results, it holds completely for exposure assessment, since the quantitative input for risk assessment is exposure assessment and uncertainty analysis. Since any description of the resulting exposure distribution(s) in terms such as very low , low , fair , moderate , high or extreme includes an evaluation, it must be defined and justified (EnHealth Council, 2004). Those communicating the results of an exposure assessment frequently use comparative reporting schemes, such as the 50%/majority/. .. /95% of data/measurements/individuals show exposure values/estimates/measurements lower than the tolerable daily intake... 

Munns WRJ, Suter GWI, Damstra T, Kroes R, Reiter W, Marafante E. 2003b. Integrated risk assessment—results of an international workshop. Human Ecol Risk Assess 9 379-386. 

Because human pharmacokinetic data are often minimal, absorption data from studies of experimental animals-by any relevant route of exposure-might assist those who must apply animal toxicity data to risk assessment. Results of a dermal developmental toxicity study that shows no adverse developmental effects are potentially misleading if uptake through the skin is not documented. Such a study would be insufficient for risk assessment, especially if it were interpreted as a negative study (one that showed no adverse effect). In studies where developmental toxicity is detected, regardless of the route of exposure, skin absorption data can be used to establish the internal dose in the pregnant animal for risk extrapolation to human dermal exposure. For a discussion pertinent both to the development and to the application of pharmacokinetic data, risk assessors can consult the conclusions of the Workshop on the Acceptability and Interpretation of Dermal Developmental Toxicity Studies (Kimmel and Francis 1990). 

Format to present risk assessment results for the purpose of risk reduction decision-making. 

To appreciate the regulatory problems this approach leads to, it is important to understand that risk assessment was developed as a tool for carrying out risk management, rather than a scientific process for understanding risk. Thus, both the selection of the data to be used and the way these data are extrapolated to the usual human exposure situation, reflect both scientific and policy considerations. As a result, risk assessment results do not represent the best scientific estimates of risk, estimates that are subject to scientific consensus, but rather prudent values that incorporate margins of safety. These margins of safety are included to increase the likelihood that regulations based on these risk assessments will successfully protect the public and the environment. 

Risk management, in simplified terms, is the decision-making process by which risk assessment results are integrated with other information to arrive at decisions about the need for, method of, and extent of risk reduction. This definition covers many levels of decision-making. At one level, it deals with the question of what programs should be undertaken to reduce risk to the population of the country. 

Risk Management - The process of integrating risk-assessment results with engineering data and social, economic and political concerns, then weighing the alternatives to select the most appropriate public health action, ranging from public education to interdiction, that will lead to reduction or elimination of the identified risk. 

QRA results are determined using various likelihood databases, consequence models, onsite and offsite population data, and other assumptions. Each of these inputs has limited accuracy, therefore, there is uncertainly associated with risk assessment results. Various sources of uncertainty are found in risk calculations, and these sources can be classified according to the different levels of calculation (TNO, 1999) ... 

Risk assessment results in the establishment of ARfDs for individual toxin groups. As the final step in the overall risk analysis, risk management GLs for the different toxin groups are established, taking into consideration the estimated consumption of different food items, and by selecting a level of protection after considering health aspects, in addition to economic and other elements. 

The scientific community seriously discusses whether the hygienic limits set in the EU are justifiable in light of the risk assessment resulting from exposure to NIEMR. The limit-setting process considers exclusively thermal effects for the frequencies... 

Based on risk assessment results, identify the level of risk for the project as defined below ... 

Based on risk assessment results, project team identify the most critical potential risks and develop mitigating actions to reduce exposure. 

The identification of further studies and inspections to refine the preliminary assessment. Probabilistic risk assessment results may be of use for such refinements. 

The uncertainties and risk criteria in the risk assessment methodology need to be more explicitly studied in the future. The uncertainties usually deals with the sensitivity of modeling parameters to the risk assessment results for different rockfall scenarios. The risk criteria needs to be established to assess the acceptable level of rockfall risk for... 

Follow Up on Actions Taken. Although a hazard analysis and a risk assessment result from applying the steps in the preceding outline, good management requires that the remaining steps in The Safety Decision Hierarchy be taken Measure the effectiveness of the actions taken determine that the residual risk is acceptable or unacceptable and start over if the risk is unacceptable. Follow-up activity would determine that the ... 

Hazard identification and risk assessment Depending on the features selected and the environmental conditions assumed for each derived product, the way in which the argument considers the risk posed by hazards could vary (ArgSysHz). Not all hazards may be relevant to all product configurations. Also, the risk assessment results for each applicable hazard may vary due to some variable external or system features. Further, the risk tolerability criteria may vary across products if these products are deployed in different environments with different certification requirements, e.g. civil vs. military applications. 

Is revised, amended, reviewed, and approved under the control of an information control scheme - 19.2.8 The following is maintained as up-to-date documentation -19.2.9 a. Hazard and risk assessment results and related assumptions SIS equipment with its safety requirements Organization responsible for maintaining functional safety Procedures necessary to achieve and maintain functional safety of the SIS Modification information for all changes to the SIS - (MOC)... 

Risk assessment and safety audit A risk assessment result can be used to predict whether the facility is safe or not. If it is not acceptable then additional control measures must be used to keep the facility safe. A safety audit is a process by which such safety claim is verified for consistency in results. Each case-by-case validation is done. 

---