Safety/risk considerations

Process risk management Industrial hygiene risks should be periodically reviewed as are process safety risks. Some of the process hazard assessment techniques used for PSM can be expanded to include consideration of industrial hygiene issues... 

Open vessel digestion (HF HC104) for ceramics, glass, rocks, and soil These acids should completely dissolve most materials. HF removes the silica (as volatile SiF4), which reduces the total dissolved solid content and therefore reduces interferences, and C104 produces perchlorates, which are soluble (but explosive if dried out). The use of hydrofluoric and perchloric acids therefore has considerable safety risks and requires specialized fume hoods, handling equipment, and safety equipment. The hydrofluoric and perchloric acids are removed by a later evaporation stage unless the analytical instmment and safety considerations have been specially adapted. 

But even a small-scale trial-and-error strategy has to be organised within society. As discussed in the previous section, iimovations are rather improbable and disadvantaged by stractural frameworks. Iimovations depend upon freedom for them to be developed. At the same time safety barriers have to be formulated within which the search process can move freely. For example, possible environmental effects must be anticipated, necessitating controlled release in small increments and retrievability must be ensured. (Quantitative and qualitative restrictions must be imposed so that retrieval and repair options can still be effective if a trial is aborted. This approach is more successful if the persistence and spatial range of a chemical is low than for persistent chemicals like CFCs and PCBs. This requires that limited Teaming spaces or experimentation spaces have to be created intentionally under technical and economic risk considerations. Small increments and a steady increase are to be preferred, accompanied by intensive monitoring of detectable consequences. 

Phenol ethers, like the parent phenols, are reactive substrates. Phenol ethers like anisole and phenetole are readily nitrated to their picryl ethers, 2,4,6-trinitroanisole and 2,4,6-trinitrophenetole respectively, on treatment with mixed acid composed of concentrated nitric and sulfuric acids at 0 °C. Such reactions are vigorous, prone to oxidative side-reactions, and pose a considerable safety risk. The direct nitration of 2,4-dinitrophenol ethers, obtained from the reaction of 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene with alkoxides, provides a more practical route to picryl ethers on an industrial scale. ... 

DTCA mitigates undertreatment of the condition, but it also appears to encourage marginal and possibly inappropriate treatment. Which of these effects dominates is at this point unclear, but it is reasonable to assume that the direction and size of the net impact varies across therapeutic classes and drugs. There is also some preliminary nonexperimental evidence suggesting that consumers adherence to treatment is affected considerably by perceived safety risks, particularly when emphasized in television advertisements. 

Safety and risk considerations are often at the center of mistake proofing. Imagine the risk associated with unveiling new investment software, or with implementing a new surgical procedure. Both the financial and health care industries have a host of mistake-proofing measures in place to avoid costly errors and litigation. 

The Eederal Eood Safety Program resides in part under the authority of the US Food and Drug Administration. The specific statutory authority is the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). The areas of responsibility include the consideration of the safety or risk of food and color additives, both direct and indirect, and food-borne contaminants, both natural and anthropogenic. The FFDCA proscribes somewhat different standards of safety/risk for intentional food additives that undergo pre-market assessment of safety, specifically, versus those dietary constituents that are found in food as contaminants because they occur naturally or because they arise from anthropogenic sources. 

Statutory provisions requiring a balancing of safety/risk against other considerations have existed for many years. Section 406 of the FD C Act, for example, has provided since 1938 that FDA may establish tolerances for poisonous or deleterious substances, that would otherwise be banned, if those substances are required in the production of food or are unavoidable under good manufacturing practices. It is this provision under which FDA has established a permissible level of aflatoxin in peanuts, corn, milk, and other agricultural commodities.(33)... 

As one can see from the aforementioned safety strategies, considerable effort is put into the reduction of any potential risk from the transgenic plant for the environment. In general, the scientific risk can be kept at a minimum, if common sense is applied - in accordance with Thomas Huxley (1825-1895) that Science is simply common sense at its best. For example, protein toxins (for vaccine production) should never be grown in food plants. 

The Range Rule also confirms this problem with deterioration of explosive fillers. It states, As they deteriorate over time, some explosives may form sensitive crystals that could detonate if subjected to heat, shock or friction. Chemical munitions contain toxics that present additional safety risks. High explosive fillers, deteriorated explosives, and chemical munitions are a few examples of Military Munitions where the filler itself requires special safety considerations, even if the fusing mechanism is no longer capable of firing. ... 

Two key aspects of new employee supervision are the amount of supervisory time they are given on any particular day, and the duration for which this intensive supervision can be maintained for. The amount of intensive supervision which a new employee receives on any particular day will be partly dependent on the number of other new employees starting work at the same time. When a new employee is the only new employee starting on the job, it should be possible for the supervisor to devote considerable time to their supervision. As other new employees come into the work environment the amount of supervisory time each will receive will be diluted, and as this supervision decreases the possibility that the new employee may be exposed to a safety risk or expose another employee to a safety risk will undoubtedly increase. The duration of intensive supervision will also be influenced by the frequency of new employee arrivals. If new employees are arriving on a weekly basis, a new employee may quickly find themselves with a less than adequate amount of supervision. 

There are several key determinants of whether helping might have safety risks and result in an accident/incident. First is a consideration of the risks associated with the task. For example, the two ta.sks of helping a colleague to supervise a test, and... 

---