Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Roughness relative

If the surface (i.e., the best fit plane) is in the x—y plane, and Z x,y) is the surface height variation (surface roughness) relative to that plane, the power spectral density is given by... [Pg.713]

Conduct feasibility studies utilizing rough relative economic (cost) and safety assessment for these 2-3 system changes. Also included are environmental impacts and organizational impacts and requirements. [Pg.498]

In any event, whether we derive the modified formula for either the total or the interaction energy, we will need Slater s generalization of the valence-bond method. Before we proceed, however, it may be well to warn the reader that the approximations made in deriving and applying the modified London formula are legion and clearly dubious. It is therefore indeed surprising that even rough relative results are obtained. [Pg.26]

The table only gives a rough (relative) picture of the potentialities of the various analytical methods. Practically attainable determination limits are often much higher because of the dilution of e.g. urine and blood samples frequently necessary, and the use of sample digests that introduce dilution factors of 10 and even higher. [Pg.303]

Surface Roughness Relatively fine spaced surface irregularities, the heights, widths, and directions of which establish the predominant surface pattern. [Pg.211]

Little rough relatively even terrain only few buildings and little vegetation in the broader surroundings... [Pg.498]

Static deflection AFM can be used to probe adhesion of polymer surfaces in air using soft cantilevers (k < 1 N/m). The measurements can be made in air under ambient conditions in the absence of plastic deformation. The calibrated pull-off force can be used in conjunction with JKR theory and an estimation of tip radius from electron microscopy to provide a local estimate of surface energy. The accuracy of the measurement depends on surface contamination, surface roughness (relative to the curvature of the tip), and tip shape uniformity. [Pg.207]

Obviously, the cost and delivery time of a custom ROIC depends on how much of existing designs can be used, but we try to suggest here at least rough relative costs and schedule. [Pg.233]

It is widely believed that gases are virtually ideal at a pressure of one atmosphere. This is more nearly tnie at relatively high temperatures, but at the nonnal boiling point (roughly 20% of the Boyle temperature), typical gases have values of pV/nRT that are 5 to 15% lower than tlie ideal value of unity. [Pg.356]

Figure Bl.22.6. Raman spectra in the C-H stretching region from 2-butanol (left frame) and 2-butanethiol (right), each either as bulk liquid (top traces) or adsorbed on a rough silver electrode surface (bottom). An analysis of the relative intensities of the different vibrational modes led to tire proposed adsorption structures depicted in the corresponding panels [53], This example illustrates the usefiilness of Raman spectroscopy for the detennination of adsorption geometries, but also points to its main limitation, namely the need to use rough silver surfaces to achieve adequate signal-to-noise levels. Figure Bl.22.6. Raman spectra in the C-H stretching region from 2-butanol (left frame) and 2-butanethiol (right), each either as bulk liquid (top traces) or adsorbed on a rough silver electrode surface (bottom). An analysis of the relative intensities of the different vibrational modes led to tire proposed adsorption structures depicted in the corresponding panels [53], This example illustrates the usefiilness of Raman spectroscopy for the detennination of adsorption geometries, but also points to its main limitation, namely the need to use rough silver surfaces to achieve adequate signal-to-noise levels.
We may now understand the nature of the change which occurs when an anhydrous salt, say copper sulphate, is shaken with a wet organic solvent, such as benzene, at about 25°. The water will first combine to form the monohydrate in accordance with equation (i), and, provided suflScient anhydrous copper sulphate is employed, the effective concentration of water in the solvent is reduced to a value equivalent to about 1 mm. of ordinary water vapour. The complete removal of water is impossible indeed, the equilibrium vapour pressures of the least hydrated tem may be taken as a rough measure of the relative efficiencies of such drying agents. If the water present is more than sufficient to convert the anhydrous copper sulphate into the monohydrate, then reaction (i) will be followed by reaction (ii), i.e., the trihydrate will be formed the water vapour then remaining will be equivalent to about 6 mm. of ordinary water vapour. Thus the monohydrate is far less effective than the anhydrous compound for the removal of water. [Pg.41]

The constant K is termed the distribution or partition coefficient. As a very rough approximation the distribution coefficient may be assumed equal to the ratio of the solubilities in the two solvents. Organic compounds are usually relatively more soluble in organic solvents than in water, hence they may be extracted from aqueous solutions. If electrolytes, e.g., sodium chloride, are added to the aqueous solution, the solubility of the organic substance is lowered, i.e., it will be salted out this will assist the extraction of the organic compound. [Pg.44]

This may be determined roughly by treating a small test portion with 3-4 ml. of hot water and acidifying with concentrated hydrochloric acid the absence of a precipitate in the warm solution indicates the essential completeness of the reaction. Salicylic acid is sparingly soluble and p-hydroxybenzoic acid is relatively soluble under these conditions. [Pg.776]

Creating synthesis route prediction programs has been the work of a relatively small number of research groups in the world. There are nearly as many algorithms as there are researchers in the field. However, all these can be roughly classified into three categories. [Pg.277]


See other pages where Roughness relative is mentioned: [Pg.348]    [Pg.629]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.629]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.606]    [Pg.662]    [Pg.934]    [Pg.938]    [Pg.1071]    [Pg.1173]    [Pg.1174]    [Pg.1600]    [Pg.1677]    [Pg.2132]    [Pg.2820]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.495]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.123]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.68 ]




SEARCH



Friction factor Relative roughness, pipe

Pipe relative roughness

Roughness, relative Chart

Turbulent flow relative roughness

© 2024 chempedia.info