Risk tools communication

Liao D, Cooper L, Cai J, Toole JF, Bryan NR, Hutchinson RG, Tyroler HA (1996) Presence and severity of cerebral white matter lesions and hypertension, its treatment, and its control. The ARIC study. Atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Stroke 27 2262-2270... 

Just when new information about the effects of chemical exposures was provoking new questions about the scientific bases of risk assessment, community-based environmental groups were coming to realize that risk assessment was not a value-neutral scientific tool, but was in fact quite political, in the sense that it could be used to reach predetermined conclusions through the deliberate choice of assumptions, uncertainty factors, and judgments. Furthermore heavy reliance on risk assessment had the effect of placing decisions in the hands of experts instead of the hands of the people who would be affected by the decisions. 

Matsuoka, C. M. 2009. Manage Risk with Communication Tools. Structural Engineer, December, p. 22. 

Development of new and existing Risk Assessment Tools (e.g., Natural Hazards Electronic Map and Assessment Tools Information System—NHEMATIS), Risk Management Tools inclusive of all stakeholders in the process (e.g., CAN/CSA Q850-97 for risk management in Canada, CAN/CSA-Z763-96 specifically for environmental concerns) Effective Risk Communication. 

Outcome 1. Suppose that risk perception is the main driver of a consumer s reaction to a food safety scare. This would suggest that communicating research information effectively is a powerful tool in changing behavior. That is, providing and communicating the true probabilities of being exposed to the risk (when possible) will be a useful way to respond to consumers concerns. 

The PAT framework and ICH Q8 will provide a basis for risk mitigation. Risk management principles and tools being developed under ICH Q9 will be necessary to describe and communicate the level of risk-mitigation achieved through quality by design and process understanding. 

Risk assessment tools such as a nine-block risk assessment (Table 9) or a failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) are available to assist the process owner with the evaluation of the process or issue to better understand and communicate the... 

The introduction of standardized data formats, communication tools and formats will lead to a more immediate availability of data. Again, if the data are transformed into knowledge to allow for control of a process, their availability greatly reduces manufacturing costs, and reduces risks of poor-quality material production. Data need to be available in a useful format in a relevant time - a time which enables action to be taken. 

Diagrams can be used to illustrate the relationships described by the conceptual model and risk hypotheses. Conceptual model diagrams are useful tools for communicating important pathways and for identifying major sources of uncertainty. These diagrams and risk hypotheses can be used to identify the most important pathways and relationships to consider in the analysis phase. The hypotheses considered most likely to contribute to risk are identified for subsequent evaluation in the risk assessment. 

In order to minimize a risk that the project DQOs will not be met due to insufficient quality of data or wrong types of analysis, we must clearly convey all of these requirements to the laboratory prior to start of work. A well-prepared laboratory SOW serves not only as a procurement tool but also as a means to ensure that the project schedule and the DQOs are clearly communicated to a prospective team member, the analytical laboratory. 

With increasingly networked, distributed computer systems the risk of deliberate malicious interactions, using software-based tools, became a serious threat. Many-fold related issues like data protection, privacy, integrity, authenticity, and denial of service attacks, viruses, worms etc. lead to a separate community to be established, which is nowadays in the main focus of the public as was safety some time ago (and still is—but only after catastrophic events). This community developed separate standards, methods, taxonomy and ways of thinking. 

When studying the ecological status of watersheds and landscapes, monitoring techniques and indicators are widely used tools. The diagnostic indicators comprise indicator species and community metric approaches. To improve the interpretation of monitoring programs and ecosystem health indicators to assess risks of... 

---