Risk assessment issues

US-EPA has formed the Risk Assessment Forum, a standing committee of senior US-EPA scientists, to promote US-EPA consensus on difficult and controversial risk assessment issues and to ensure that this consensus is incorporated into appropriate US-EPA risk assessment guidance. To fulhil this purpose, the Forum assembles US-EPA risk assessment experts in a formal process to study and report on issues from a US-EPA scientific perspective. Major Fomm guidance documents are developed in accordance with the US-EPA s regulatory and policy development process and become US-EPA pohcy upon approval by the Administrator or the Deputy Administrator. The Risk Assessment Forum products include risk assessment guidelines, technical panel reports on special risk assessment issues, and peer consultation and peer review workshops addressing controversial risk assessment topics. 

According to the Directive, an active substance cannot be used in a PPP unless it is included in an EU positive list. The Directive also requires very extensive risk assessments for effects on health and environment to be carried out, before a PPP can be placed on the market and used. In 1992, the European Commission started a Community-wide review process for aU active substances used in PPPs within the EU. Based on scientific assessments, each applicant had to prove that a substance could be used safely regarding human health, the environment, ecotoxicology and residues in the food chain. This program will be completed by 2008. From the end of 2003, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) deals with risk assessment issues and the European Commission retains the risk... 

Smith EP, Shugart HH. 1994. Uncertainty in ecological risk assessment. In Ecological risk assessment issue papers. Washington (DC) Risk Assessment Forum, US Environmental Protection Agency. USEPA 630/R/94/009. 

The next three sections of this report are arranged to follow the framework sequentially Section 2 describes problem formulation this section is particularly important for assessors to consider when specific assessment endpoints are not determined a priori by statute or other authority. Section 3 and Section 4 discuss analysis and risk characterization, respectively. Section 5 defines the terms used in this report, and Section 6 provides literature references. The lists of ecological risk assessment issues at the end of Section 1 to Section 4 highlight areas for further discussion and research. EPA believes that these... 

EPA. 1996b. Risk assessment issue paper for Derivation of a provisional oral RfD for 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene. Superfund Health Risk Technical Support Center, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Cincinnati, OH. (96-012/03-08-96)... 

US EPA (1996). Risk Assessment Issue Paper for Derivation of an Oral RfD for Methylphospho-nic Acid (CASRN 993-13-5), Paper No. 96-024. Cincinnati, OH NCEA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 

Fisher SG and Woodmansee R, Issue Paper On Ecological Recovery, in Ecological Risk Assessment Issue Papers, EPA/630/R-94/009, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1994, chap. 7. 

Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (1997) Ecological risk assessment. Issue Paper, Pensacola, FL, USA... 

The mixtures of kneading clay and rubber known as bouncing clay should not be given to children The Federal German Institute for Risk Assessment issued a... 

It is often thought that risk assessment issues are in order when the risks of the production are assessed. (Employer representative)... 

Thus, model selection, and data selection to define dose/response curves, are critical variables in assessing risk. The guidelines on carcinogenic risk assessment issued by EPA in 1984 give considerable freedom to the risk assessor on model and data selection and results on the same problem assessed by two individuals can vary widely. 

In classical risk assessment approaches the technical and economical issues are analysed with different methods. The main reason for this is, in addition to the problem to get suitable data, a methodical problem. The methods to analyse technical risks are not compatible with economical issues and vice versa. This paper compares the most common and general methods for complex data analysis and manipulation. It concludes that the Monte-Carlo-Simulation is very suitable for risk assessment issues. The MCS, based on random events, can handle almost any common information (e.g. empirical, continuous, quantative data and expert knowledge). This is one of the major advantages of the simulation method due to the fact that different kinds of information are used in technical and economical issues. To perform a risk assessment with the MCS it is suitable to use an adapted v-model to connect the technical with the economical level. To get versatile outputs, MCS can be inserted in all typical statistic methods which offer a lot of possible output visualizations. 

---