Hazard identification risk assessment

THE FOUR STEPS IN RISK ASSESSMENT Hazard Identification... 

Describe risk assessment, hazard identification, and vulnerability analysis. 

Keywords risk assessment hazard identification dose-response assessment exposure assessment ecosystem concentrations system boundary... 

Hazard and risk assessment Hazard identification TR A End users and operators... 

Thus, the distinction between the hazard (an inherent toxic property of a chemical that may or may not be manifested, depending on exposure potential) and risk (the consequences of being exposed to a hazardous chemical at a particular exposure level) is critical (Purchase, 2000). Each component of a risk assessment—hazard identification, dose-response evaluation, and exposure assessment—is essential for evaluating the potential risks associated with the use of a substance such as a nanomaterial. The components of a risk assessment are universal in their application for assessing the hazards and risks of chemicals or products for a variety of industries or environmental exposures, regardless of the types of chemicals of interest (such as solvents, fibers, particulates and nanomaterials). 

To summarize the noncancer health risk-assessment process, chemicals of concern, pathways of exposure, and exposed populations are identified in the first step of the risk assessment, hazard identification. In the second step, analysis of exposure, the doses are estimated for each population, each exposure pathway, and each chemical of concern in the form of chronic daily intakes, or CDIs. In the third step of the risk assessment, analysis of effect, noncancer health effects are estimated by comparing CDIs to reference doses, or RfDs, derived from animal toxicity studies (with input from human epidemiological studies, when available). If the CDI is greater... 

The leadership team may or may not be sensitive to these influences and allow the creation of conditions that effect the safety of employees, the environment, and the overall organization. Implementing a safety system helps to provide a structure that monitors a full range of activities from risk assessment, hazard identification, and correction tracking to develop consistent rules, procedures, and safe work practices. 

Process risk management Management of residual risk through hazard identification, risk assessment and reduction, emergency preparedness, and working with suppliers and customers (including carriers) apply... 

The risk assessment comprises an effect assessment (hazard identification and hazard characterization) and an exposure assessment. The principles for the effect assessment of the active substances are in principle similar to those for existing and new chemicals and are addressed in detail in Chapter 4. Based on the outcome of the effect assessment, an Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) and an Acceptable Operator Exposure Level (AOEL) are derived, usually from the NOAEL by applying an overall assessment factor addressing differences between experimental effect assessment data (usually from animal studies) and the real human exposure situation, taking into account variability and uncertainty for further details the reader is referred to Chapter 5. As a part of the effect assessment, classification and labeling of the active substance according to the criteria laid down in Directive 67/548/EEC (EEC 1967) is also addressed (Section 2.4.1.8). 

Risk characterization The synthesis of critically evaluated information and data from exposure assessment, hazard identification and dose-response considerations into a summary that identifies clearly the... 

Risk characterization The synthesis of critically evaluated information and data from exposure assessment, hazard identification, and dose-response considerations into a summary that identifies clearly the strengths and weaknesses of the database, the criteria applied to evaluation and validation of all aspects of methodology, and the conclusions reached from the review of scientific information. 

The risk assessment requires information about potential risks, effects, and impacts on current processes and environments. Process risk assessment is mainly determined by the probability of process interruption, system down times, and restart of a system. Typical chemical risk assessments comprise identification of hazards for personnel, customers, and environment, qualitative assessment of potential adverse consequences of the contaminant, and evidence of their significance. The previously described systems for toxicology estimation are useful software modules in this process. Environmental risks require additional dose-response assessments as well as quantification of exposure to determine the dose that individuals will receive. Einally, a qualitative assessment of the probability for recurrence of the exception is performed, or — in the case of systematic occurrence — the exception is linked to similar cases. 

Risk Assessment The identification and analysis, either qualitative or quantitative, of the likelihood of the occurrence of a hazardous event or exposure, and the severity of injury or illness that may be caused by it... 

Techniques that allow each individual to assess specific perceived risk and hazard identification with a practical method to prioritize issues. Refer to Chapter 9, Risk Perception— Defining How to Identify Personal Responsibility . 

Management leadership Employee involvement Risk and hazard identification and assessment Hazard prevention and control Education and training Performance and measurement... 

Hazard Anaiysis Risk Assessment isk identification and ASiL hreats identification ... 

The PSE is responsible for the technical tasks relating to the SSP. This primarily involves hazard identification and resolution, risk assessment, hazard tracking and closure, and safety ocumentation. On the government side of a program. 

The cote system safety process can therefore be reduced to Hazard Identification -> Hazard Risk Assessment -> Hazard Risk Control -> Hazard Risk Verifica-tion-> Hazard Identification... (Ericson 2005). This is a closed-loop process where Hazards ate identified and tracked until acceptable closure action is implemented and verified. 

Fig. 1. Flow chart representing the complete hazard identification and risk assessment procedure.

An important part of hazard analysis and risk assessment is the identification of the scenario, or design basis by which hazards result in accidents. Hazards are constandy present in any chemical faciUty. It is the scenario, or sequence of initiating and propagating events, which makes the hazard result in an accident. Many accidents have been the result of an improper identification of the scenario. 

The remaining step in the hazard identification and risk assessment procedure shown in Figure 1 is to decide on risk acceptance. For this step, few resources are available and analysts are left basically by themselves. Some companies have formal risk acceptance criteria. Most companies, however, use the results on a relative basis. That is, the results are compared to another process or processes where hazards and risks are weU-characterized. 

Hazard identification involves gathering and evaluating data on the types of health injury or disease that may be produced by a chemical and on the conditions of exposure under which injury or disease is produced. It may also involve characterization of the behavior of a chemical within the body and the interactions it undergoes with organs, cells, or even parts of cells. Hazard identification is not risk assessment. It is a scientific determination of whether observed toxic effects in one setting will occur in other settings. 

Wells, G., Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment, Rugby, Warwickshire, UK Institution of Chemical Engineers, 1996. 

Hazard identification Risk assessment of existing operations Reduction of risk... 

Banks, W., Wells, J. E. (1992). A Probabilistic Risk Assessment Using Human Reliability Analysis Methods. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Hazard Identification and Risk Analysis, Human Factors, and Human Reliability in Process Safety. New York American Institute of Chemical Engineers, CCPS. 

In this study detailed fault trees with probability and failure rate calculations were generated for the events (1) Fatality due to Explosion, Fire, Toxic Release or Asphyxiation at the Process Development Unit (PDU) Coal Gasification Process and (2) Loss of Availability of the PDU. The fault trees for the PDU were synthesized by Design Sciences, Inc., and then subjected to multiple reviews by Combustion Engineering. The steps involved in hazard identification and evaluation, fault tree generation, probability assessment, and design alteration are presented in the main body of this report. The fault trees, cut sets, failure rate data and unavailability calculations are included as attachments to this report. Although both safety and reliability trees have been constructed for the PDU, the verification and analysis of these trees were not completed as a result of the curtailment of the demonstration plant project. Certain items not completed for the PDU risk and reliability assessment are listed. 

---