Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reverse osmosis membrane performance

Reverse osmosis membranes prepared by LCVD on porous membrane showed unique but very peculiar reverse osmosis membrane performance [10,13]. In general, the reverse osmosis membrane performance declines with time, i.e., salt rejection and particularly water flux decline with time, which is recognized as membrane fouling. [Pg.761]

All surface waters and municipal effluents contain suspended solids as well as dissolved solids and the presence of suspended solids dictates the need for a pretreatment section. Experience has shown that effective removal of the suspended solids in pretreatment is a prerequisite to efficient reverse osmosis membrane performance. Suspended solids in secondary effluent are primarily organic in nature and, due to their small size, it is difficult to remove them by settling. Therefore, it is necessary to aggregate the smaller particles into larger particles which can more easily be removed by settling and filtration. [Pg.292]

Duan, M., Wang, Z., Xu, J., Wang, J., and Wang, S. 2010. Influence of hexamethyl phosphoramide on polyamide composite reverse osmosis membrane performance. Separation... [Pg.32]

Nonporous Dense Membranes. Nonporous, dense membranes consist of a dense film through which permeants are transported by diffusion under the driving force of a pressure, concentration, or electrical potential gradient. The separation of various components of a solution is related directiy to their relative transport rate within the membrane, which is determined by their diffusivity and solubiUty ia the membrane material. An important property of nonporous, dense membranes is that even permeants of similar size may be separated when their concentration ia the membrane material (ie, their solubiUty) differs significantly. Most gas separation, pervaporation, and reverse osmosis membranes use dense membranes to perform the separation. However, these membranes usually have an asymmetric stmcture to improve the flux. [Pg.61]

The performance of reverse osmosis membranes is generaUy described by the water and salt fluxes (74,75). The water flux,/ is linked to the pressure and concentration gradients across the membrane by equation 4 ... [Pg.80]

Fig. 34. Water and salt fluxes through a high performance reverse osmosis membrane, when tested with a 3.5% NaCl feed solution. The water flux increases, whereas the salt flux is essentially independent of appHed pressure (76). To convert MPa to psig, multiply by 145. Fig. 34. Water and salt fluxes through a high performance reverse osmosis membrane, when tested with a 3.5% NaCl feed solution. The water flux increases, whereas the salt flux is essentially independent of appHed pressure (76). To convert MPa to psig, multiply by 145.
Transport Models. Many mechanistic and mathematical models have been proposed to describe reverse osmosis membranes. Some of these descriptions rely on relatively simple concepts others are far more complex and require sophisticated solution techniques. Models that adequately describe the performance of RO membranes are important to the design of RO processes. Models that predict separation characteristics also minimize the number of experiments that must be performed to describe a particular system. Excellent reviews of membrane transport models and mechanisms are available (9,14,25-29). [Pg.146]

Asymmetric membranes have a tight, low-permeability, retentive zone that performs the desired separation and a more open, high-permeability zone that provides mechanical strength to the overall membrane. This structure is particularly critical to the economic viability of reverse-osmosis membranes. Asymmetric membranes operated in TFF mode must have the tight side facing the feed channel so that particles are retained on its surface and can be acted upon by the tangential flow. Asymmetric membranes operated in NFF mode can... [Pg.38]

The Effect of Halogens on the Performance and Durability of Reverse-Osmosis Membranes... [Pg.171]

The rapid expansion of reverse osmosis technology during the past two decades has resulted in the development of a variety of new membranes. Unique polymer systems and fabrication methods have led to the production of membranes with significantly improved performance and reliability. In spite of these developments little is known about chemical sensitivity or life expectancy of reverse osmosis membranes used in desalting applications. Manufacturers are consequently reluctant to guarantee their products for long runs especially in unique chemical environments. [Pg.171]

Membrane Properties. The performance range of ammonia-modified membranes in low pressure operation is indicated in Figure 6 along with the performance of the reference membrane (I, reference membrane IV, ammonia-modified membrane). The lower boundary of the performance range refers to a solvent-to-polymer ratio of 3, the upper boundary to a ratio of 4. While the salt rejection towards univalent ions of the ammonia-modified membrane is limited to below 80 %, the maximum low pressure flux is over 15 m /m d (approaching 400 gfd) at a sodium chloride rejection of the order of 10 %. This membrane thus exhibits the flux capability of an ultrafiltration membrane while retaining the features of reverse osmosis membranes, viz. asymmetry and pressure resistance. [Pg.196]

The origin of thin-film-composite reverse osmosis membranes began with a newly formed research institute and one of its first employees, Peter S. Francis. North Star Research and Development Institute was formed in Minneapolis during 1963 to fill a need for a nonprofit contract research institute in the Upper Midwest. Francis was given the mission of developing the chemistry division through support, in part, by federal research contracts. At this time the Initial discoveries by Reid and Breton ( ) on the desalination capability of dense cellulose acetate membranes and by Loeb and Sourlrajan (,2) on asymmetric cellulose acetate membranes had recently been published. Francis speculated that improved membrane performance could be achieved, if the ultrathin, dense barrier layer and the porous substructure of the asymmetric... [Pg.305]

This paper has provided the reader with an introduction to a class of polymers that show great potential as reverse osmosis membrane materials — poly(aryl ethers). Resistance to degradation and hydrolysis as well as resistance to stress Induced creep make membranes of these polymers particularly attractive. It has been demonstrated that through sulfonation the hydrophilic/hydrophobic, flux/separation, and structural stability characteristics of these membranes can be altered to suit the specific application. It has been Illustrated that the nature of the counter-ion of the sulfonation plays a role in determining performance characteristics. In the preliminary studies reported here, one particular poly(aryl ether) has been studied — the sulfonated derivative of Blsphenol A - polysulfone. This polymer was selected to serve as a model for the development of experimental techniques as well as to permit the investigation of variables... [Pg.345]

The same nanofiltration experiments were performed with a 50-A ultrafiltration membrane (available from US Filter/Membralox, Warrendale, PA,USA), this time with a monodentate phosphite ligand (24) used for comparison and toluene as the solvent (Table V). Both higher retentions and flux rates for the dendrimers were obtained relative to what was observed with the reverse osmosis membranes. Dendrophite G4 was used in three subsequent reactions carried out with this procedure. [Pg.98]

TABLE 19.6. Performance Data of Reverse Osmosis Membrane Modules (a) Data of Belfort (1984). [Pg.640]

The chemical sensitivity or life expectancy of reverse osmosis membranes is very important for manufacturing application. Thus chlorine is the most well known reagent for water disinfection. Glaster et al. 61 inspected the influence of halogens on the performance and durability of reverse osmosis membranes. Cellulose acetate was unresponsive to halogen agents but polyamide-type membranes deteriorated rapidly when exposed to halogens. [Pg.77]

Equation (2.37) and the equivalent expression for component 7 give the water flux and the salt flux across the reverse osmosis membrane in terms of the pressure and concentration difference across the membrane. There is an analytical expression for Equation (2.37) for a two-component feed mixture that allows the performance of the membrane to be calculated for known permeabilities, DtK 11 and DjK /l, and feed concentrations, cio and cjo. However, more commonly... [Pg.31]

The most extensive studies of plasma-polymerized membranes were performed in the 1970s and early 1980s by Yasuda, who tried to develop high-performance reverse osmosis membranes by depositing plasma films onto microporous poly-sulfone films [60,61]. More recently other workers have studied the gas permeability of plasma-polymerized films. For example, Stancell and Spencer [62] were able to obtain a gas separation plasma membrane with a hydrogen/methane selectivity of almost 300, and Kawakami et al. [63] have reported plasma membranes... [Pg.124]

Dynamically formed membranes were pursued for many years for reverse osmosis because of their high water fluxes and relatively good salt rejection, especially with brackish water feeds. However, the membranes proved to be unstable and difficult to reproduce reliably and consistently. For these reasons, and because high-performance interfacial composite membranes were developed in the meantime, dynamically formed reverse osmosis membranes fell out of favor. A small application niche in high-temperature nanofiltration and ultrafiltration remains, and Rhone Poulenc continues their production. The principal application is poly(vinyl alcohol) recovery from hot wash water produced in textile dyeing operations. [Pg.125]

Depending on the enrichment term (E0) of the membrane, the modulus can be larger or smaller than 1.0. For reverse osmosis E0 is less than 1.0, and the concentration polarization modulus is normally between 1.1 and 1.5 that is, the concentration of salt at the membrane surface is 1.1 to 1.5 times larger than it would be in the absence of concentration polarization. The salt leakage through the membrane and the osmotic pressure that must be overcome to produce a flow of water are increased proportionately. Fortunately, modem reverse osmosis membranes are extremely selective and permeable, and can still produce useful desalted water under these conditions. In other membrane processes, such as pervaporation or ultrafiltration, the concentration polarization modulus may be as large as 5 to 10 or as small as 0.2 to 0.1, and may seriously affect the performance of the membrane. [Pg.168]

Cellulose acetate was the first high-performance reverse osmosis membrane material discovered. The flux and rejection of cellulose acetate membranes have now been surpassed by interfacial composite membranes. However, cellulose acetate membranes still maintain a small fraction of the market because they are easy to make, mechanically tough, and resistant to degradation by chlorine and other oxidants, a problem with interfacial composite membranes. Cellulose acetate membranes can tolerate up to 1 ppm chlorine, so chlorination can be used to sterilize the feed water, a major advantage with feed streams having significant bacterial loading. [Pg.197]

The comparative performance of high-pressure, high-rejection reverse osmosis membranes, medium-pressure brackish water desalting membranes, and low-pressure nanofiltration membranes is shown in Table 5.2. Generally, the performance of a membrane with a particular salt can be estimated reliably once the... [Pg.207]

Reverse osmosis membranes can be divided into subclasses according to their solute/water selectivity and operating pressure regimes. Figure 30 shows a number of commercial membranes developed for seawater and brackish desalination, and for nanofiltration. These include cellulose ester and polyamide asymmetric membranes available since the 1960s, and high-performance composite membranes developed in the 1970s. Collectively, they make it possible to produce potable water from virtually all saline water sources. [Pg.381]

FIGURE 30 Performance of some commercial reverse osmosis membranes for (a) seawater desalination (test conditions 56 bar 25°C 3.5% NaCI feed) (b) low-pressure desalination (15 bar 25°C 1500 mg/liter NaCI feed) and (c) ultralow-pressure nanofiltration applications (7.5 bar, 25°C 500 mg/liter NaCI feed). [Pg.382]


See other pages where Reverse osmosis membrane performance is mentioned: [Pg.142]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.13]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.8 ]




SEARCH



Membranes reverse osmosis

Osmosis

Osmosis reversed

Reverse osmosis

Reverse osmosis performance

© 2024 chempedia.info