Relationship with activity coefficient

At this point, we have defined an ideal reference state for the RNA in which there are no net interactions with ions, and introduced the RNA activity coefficient as a factor that assesses the deviation of the RNA from ideal behavior due to its interactions with all the ions in solution. No assumptions have been made about the nature of the ion interactions anions and cations, long- and short-range interactions all contribute. The ion interaction coefficients (Eqs. (21.4a) and (21.4b)) also reflect the ion—RNA interactions that create concentration differences in a dialysis experiment, and there is an intimate relationship between activity coefficients (y) and interaction coefficients (F), as developed below. This relationship will be extremely useful y comes from the chemical potential and gives access to free energies and other thermodynamic functions, while F is directly accessible by both experiment and computation (see Pappu et al., this volume, 111.20). 

In view of these uncertainties, it may prove more advantageous provisionally to work with an empirical relationship between activity coefficients and ionic strength of more concentrated solutions, instead of the Debye-Huckel equation. Bjerrum has found from experience that the following equation holds within wide limits ... 

The excess enthalpy of a liquid mixture can be rigorously related to the excess Gibbs energy of the solution models for are typically used for calculating phase equilibria with activity coefficients. The relationship is... 

It is seen that the additional (nonnalised) activity coefficients introduced in Eq. (2.10) to establish the consistency between the standard potentials of the pure components and those at infinite dilution, can be incorporated into the constant Kj in Eq. (2.15). Therefore, if a diluted solution with activity coefficients of unity is taken as the standard state, the form of Eqs. (2.13) and (2.14) remains unchanged. The equations (2.14) and (2.15) are the most general relationships from which meiny well-known isotherms for non-ionic surfactants can be obtained. For further derivation it is necessary to express the surface molar fractions, x-, in terms of their Gibbs adsorption values Tj. For this we introduce the degree of surface coverage, i.e. 9j = TjCOj or 0j = TjCO. Here to is the partial molar area averaged over all components or all... 

Provided that the ratio of activity coefficients is invariant over the range of acidity concerned, a linear relationship with unit slope between logic Aaobs. 2nd +logic % o) i expected. However, there is... 

In thermodynamics the formal way of dealing with nonideality is to introduce an activity coefficient 7 into the relationship between activity and mole fraction ... 

This relationship depends on the assumption that two similar stationary phases, irrespective of their polarity, can be considered to differ by measuring the ratio of the activity coefficients of two noncomplexing solutes (this basically implies the solute is nonpolar and will only interact with the stationary phase by dispersion forces). If this were true then. 

Despite the work of Overton and Meyer, it was to be many years before structure-activity relationships were explored further. In 1939 Ferguson [10] postulated that the toxic dose of a chemical is a constant fraction of its aqueous solubility hence toxicity should increase as aqueous solubility decreases. Because aqueous solubility and oil-water partition coefficient are inversely related, it follows that toxicity should increase with partition coefficient. Although this has been found to be true up to a point, it does not continue ad infinitum. Toxicity (and indeed, any biological response) generally increases initially with partition coefficient, but then tends to fall again. This can be explained simply as a reluctance of very hydrophobic chemicals to leave a lipid phase and enter the next aqueous biophase [11]. An example of this is shown by a QSAR that models toxicity of barbiturates to the mouse [12] ... 

Changes in activity coefficients (and hence the relationship between concentration and chemical activity) due to the increased electrostatic interaction between ions in solution can be nicely modeled with well-known theoretical approaches such as the Debye-Huckel equation ... 

These relationships are termed the Harned rules and have been verified experimentally up to high overall molality values (e.g. for a mixture of HC1 and KC1 up to 2 mol-kg-1). If this linear relationship between the logarithm of the activity coefficient of one electrolyte and the molality of the second electrolyte in a mixture with constant overall molality is not fulfilled, then a further term is added, including the square of the appropriate molality ... 

It has been emphasized repeatedly that the individual activity coefficients cannot be measured experimentally. However, these values are required for a number of purposes, e.g. for calibration of ion-selective electrodes. Thus, a conventional scale of ionic activities must be defined on the basis of suitably selected standards. In addition, this definition must be consistent with the definition of the conventional activity scale for the oxonium ion, i.e. the definition of the practical pH scale. Similarly, the individual scales for the various ions must be mutually consistent, i.e. they must satisfy the relationship between the experimentally measurable mean activity of the electrolyte and the defined activities of the cation and anion in view of Eq. (1.1.11). Thus, by using galvanic cells without transport, e.g. a sodium-ion-selective glass electrode and a Cl -selective electrode in a NaCl solution, a series of (NaCl) is obtained from which the individual ion activity aNa+ is determined on the basis of the Bates-Guggenheim convention for acr (page 37). Table 6.1 lists three such standard solutions, where pNa = -logflNa+, etc. 

Geochemical modelers currently employ two types of methods to estimate activity coefficients (Plummer, 1992 Wolery, 1992b). The first type consists of applying variants of the Debye-Hiickel equation, a simple relationship that treats a species activity coefficient as a function of the species size and the solution s ionic strength. Methods of this type take into account the distribution of species in solution and are easy to use, but can be applied with accuracy to modeling only relatively dilute fluids. 

While this relationship is simple, it introduces more errors because the activity coefficient (or more normally, the mean ionic activity coefficient y ) is wholly unknown. While y can sometimes be calculated (e.g. via the Debye-Huckel relationships described in Section 3.4), such calculated values often differ quite significantly from experimental values, particularly when working at higher ionic strengths. In addition, ionic strength adjusters and TISABs are recommended in conjunction with calibration curves. 

The activity a and concentration c are related by a = (c/c ) x y (equation (3.12)), where y is the mean ionic activity coefficient, itself a function of the ionic strength /. Approximate values of y can be calculated for solution-phase analytes by using the Debye-Huckel relationships (equations (3.14) and (3.15)). The change of y with ionic strength can be a major cause of error in electroanalytical measurements, so it is advisable to buffer the ionic strength (preferably at a high value), e.g. with a total ionic strength adjustment buffer (TISAB). 

With this definition, the relationship for the mean activity coefficient... 

To deal with this problem, Bjermm [4] suggested that the deviation of solvent behavior from Raoult s law be described by the osmotic coefficient g rather than by the activity coefficient 71. The osmotic coefficient is defined by the relationships... 

This equation is a fairly typical biological structure-activity relationship with a strong dependence on partition coefficients, and it therefore suggests that the nitrosamines, and perhaps other chemical carcinogens as well, are similar - in the pharmacological sense - to analgesics or toxic agents. 

The Gibbs phase rule is the basis for organizing the models. In general, the number of independent variables (degrees of freedom) is equal to the number of variables minus the number of independent relationships. For each unique phase equilibria, we may write one independent relationship. In addition to this (with no other special stipulations), we may write one additional independent relationship to maintain electroneutrality. Table I summarizes the chemical constituents considered as variables in this study and by means of chemical reactions depicts independent relationships. (Throughout the paper, activity coefficients are calculated by the Debye-Hiickel relationship). Since there are no data available on pressure dependence, pressure is considered a constant at 1 atm. Sulfate and chloride are not considered variables because little specific data concerning their equilibria are available. Sulfate may be involved in a redox reaction with iron sulfides (e.g., hydrotroilite), and/or it may be in equilibrium with barite (BaS04) or some solid solution combinations. Chloride may reach no simple chemical equilibrium with respect to a phase. Therefore, these two ions are considered only to the... 

The standard state is defined as the hypothetical state that would exist if the solutewere at a concentration oTTMTbut with the molecules experiencing the environment of an extremely dilute solution with this standard state, activity coefficients approach unity with increasing dilution. For electrolytes in dilute solution in water, the departure of the coefficients from unity can be calculated from the Debye-Hiickel relationship.8... 

Once established, the H scale is used to find pKa values for weak acids. A number of measurements have been made by various groups.53-57 The results obtained at first appeared to disagree with Streitwieser s, but revision of values for some compounds on the basis of further measurements brought the results of the two methods into fairly good agreement. At the same time, however, it became clear that the problems discussed in the previous sections relating to the different behavior of substances of different structural type also apply to the // scale work.58 The activity coefficient ratio evidently is not the same for carbon acids as for the nitrogen acids used to establish the scale.59 Thus the pAa values found by these methods, while probably internally consistent for similar compounds, are not on a firm basis with respect to their absolute relationship to the water scale. 

---