Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Language context-free

Context-Free Languages allow only productions of the form a —> d, where a is an arbitrary string of terminal and non-terminal symbols there is also a fixed bound on the length of a (= 5- ). Recognized by Push-Down Automata. [Pg.293]

Context-Free Languages/ Push-Down Automata... [Pg.296]

SO that this context-free language consists of all strings of the form I3i02 Af. [Pg.298]

More specifically, the basic notions of a Turing Machine, of computable functions and of undecidable properties are needed for Chapter VI (Decision Problems) the definitions of recursive, primitive recursive and partial recursive functions are helpful for Section F of Chapter IV and two of the proofs in Chapter VI. The basic facts regarding regular sets, context-free languages and pushdown store automata are helpful in Chapter VIII (Monadic Recursion Schemes) and in the proof of Theorem 3.14. For Chapter V (Correctness and Program Verification) it is useful to know the basic notation and ideas of the first order predicate calculus a highly abbreviated version of this material appears as Appendix A. [Pg.6]

The interested reader can easily check that U(P) is a context-free language. [Pg.47]

THEOREM 8.1+ The reversal of the interpreted value language of a monadic recursion scheme is a deterministic context-free language. [Pg.306]

Every context-free language is the value language of sane monadic recursion scheme. [Pg.309]

However not every deterministic context-free language - even if it is in the right format - is the reversal of the interpreted value language of some monadic recursion scheme the regular set xO(fO) is an obvious example. [Pg.309]

If L is a context-free language, there is a reverse standard form context-free grammar G = (V,E,P,S) such that L = L(G) and all rules of P are of the forms... [Pg.309]

Prove that for a program scheme P, the domain U(P) of a free interpretation is always a context-free language. [Pg.345]

A very nice general tutorial of HMMs is given in (Rabiner, 1989). An extension of HMMs from finite automata (which is the deterministic version of a Markov chain) to context-free languages leads to the concept of a stochastic context-free grammar. Such grammars have been used in an analogous way to predict RNA secondary structures (Grate et al., 1994). [Pg.427]

S. Ginsburg, The Mathematical Theory of Context-Free Languages, McGraw-Hill, New York. [Pg.92]

Most of grammatical inference research has been focused on learning regular and context-free languages. Although these are the basic classes of the Chomsky hierarchy, it has been proved that even to learn these classes is already too hard under certain learning paradigms. Next, we review the main formal models proposed in this field and some of the main learnability results obtained. [Pg.49]

We have seen that already DFAwtls accept non-context-free languages. [Pg.112]

In this subsection we present some additional examples (both for DFAwtl languages and for our parsing algorithm). The next example is one of the most typical and important (deterministic) context-free languages. [Pg.115]

Further, we present two non-context-free languages that are closely related to basic mildly context-sensitive languages. [Pg.116]

It is known that none of the classes of regular, linear and context-free languages are closed under commutative closure, however, the commutative closure of regular and linear and context-free languages coincide, and this class is the class of commutative semi-linear languages. [Pg.119]

It is clear that the regular expressions with permutations describes all regular languages and they also describes some non-context-free languages, e.g., (abc) = w e a, b, c w a = w b, w 6 = w c -... [Pg.120]

Gazdar, G. Natural languages and context-free languages. Linguist. Philos. 4, 469-473 (1982)... [Pg.127]

We first show by a counterexample that context free languages are insufficient model for organic synthesis. We then argue (alas we cannot prove, for the above reasons) that context sensitive languages are a sufficient model. [Pg.71]

It is well known that languages such as ww, where w is some string over Vt, are not context free. For example the set of all alkanes CH3CH(Ri)R2 where Ri=R2 is not a context free language. The set of all tertiary alcohols derived by Grignard addition to methyl acetate, represented as CH3C0H(Ri)R2, Ri=R2 is thus not context free. That it is context sensitive follows from construction of a context sensitive grammar for... [Pg.71]

Knuth, D. E. (1968) Semantics of Context-Free Languages. Mathematical Systems Theory Wol 2, No 2, pp 127-145. [Pg.288]

Sideri, M., Efraimidis, S. and P >akonstantinou, G (1989) Semanticaly Driven Parsing of Context-Free Languages. The Computer Journal, Vol 32, No 1. [Pg.289]

Fig. 4.10 Schematic illustration of Smith s r = 1 bounded CA that recognizes the context-free language L (consisting of palindromes) in real time. The lightly shaded rightmost cell at t = 7 indicates acceptance of the input. Fig. 4.10 Schematic illustration of Smith s r = 1 bounded CA that recognizes the context-free language L (consisting of palindromes) in real time. The lightly shaded rightmost cell at t = 7 indicates acceptance of the input.

See other pages where Language context-free is mentioned: [Pg.297]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.115]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.296 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info