Receptor points

Using the Gaussian plume model and the other relations presented, it is possible to compute ground level concentrations C, at any receptor point (Xq, in the region resulting from each of the isolated sources in the emission inventory. Since Equation (2) is linear for zero or linear decay terms, superposition of solutions applies. The concentration distribution is available by computing the values of C, at various receptors and summing over all sources. 

Due to the common appearance of 7 transmembrane helices, the family of G-protein coupled receptors is also known as the family of the 7-helix transmembrane receptors. The G-protein coupled receptors are also sometimes called the serpentine receptors, pointing to the serpentine-like configuration of transmembrane hehces. 

Theoretically, inverse agonists may be useful agents for the treatment of disease symptoms caused by constitutive receptor activity. Covalent modifications of the receptor protein, pathological increase in receptor or G protein densities, or inherited or somatic point mutations may lead to increased constitutive receptor activity. For example, certain inherited point mutations in rhodopsin have been shown to cause retinitis pigmentosa. The involvement of inherited, constitutively activating receptor point mutations has also been demonstrated in certain forms of hyperthyroidism, in male precocious puberty, and in Jansen-type metaphyseal chondrodysplasia [8]. Constitutive G protein activity may also be an important factor in autoimmune diseases [9]. 

Third, additional dispersion modeling was performed to identify source-receptor relationships and define culpable sources (those sources that have the largest contributions to the total impact) for the receptor points identified. These results are illustrated in Fig. 14. For example, at the point of highest concentration... 

Figure 5.25. The 3D subspace most receptor relevant for members of the GPCR-PA+ femily of receptors. Points indicate coordinates of 187 published ligands of various GPCR-PA+ receptors. Some have been color-coded by receptor for illustrative purposes. See Reis. 32e,i and text for further details. See color insert.

With a set of receptor points, the objective function requires some thought before the trade-offs in the locations of the abatement devices can work efficiently. In a first series of optimisations, the objective function was defined as the sum of the ratios of the total oxidised nitrogen deposition to those in the uncontrolled base case. This formulation of objective function expresses the desire to maximise the fractional improvement at all sites and gives the trade-offs scope to produce a fuUy European strategy. 

Modeling (1) Manallack 1988 hypothetical receptor points (2) Largent 1987 3- and 4-phenylpiperidines with bulky N-substituent (3) Ablordeppey 1992 2-phenylpropanolamine Revision of the above models may be necessary to account for compounds such as the ycarbolines Models may be inaccurate due the existence of subtypes... 

For the assessment of the contribution of the emission categories to the observed NMVOC concentrations the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) modelling technique, version 8 from United States Environmental Protection Agency (Watson et al., 1998 Watson et al., 2001) was selected. The method uses source specific ratios between the emission rates of certain set of compounds and aims to recognise these fingerprints, or soiuce profiles, in the profile measured at the receptor point. As a result the CMB model delivers contributions from each source type to the total ambient NMVOC and individual hydrocarbon species at receptor points and their uncertainties. 

To perform the source apportionment the Chemical Mass Balance model applies the emission profiles from traffic and solvent use to the NMVOCs concentrations measmed at the different receptors point in Wuppertal. Measurements were performed down-wind from the city centre, in areas close to the factories and workshop producing or using solvents, in dense traffic areas and in residential areas. The characteristics of the receptor points are presented in Table 2. 

G Protein Coupled Receptors Point Mutation Database... 

Results for elements in aerosol samples which are obtained by multielement techniques from data sets from which information about the sources of the components can be extracted (Gordon 1980). Such methods which make use of data obtained at receptor points are called receptor models. The most important receptor models are chemical mass balances (CMB), enrichment factors, time series correlation, multivariate models and spatial models (Cooper and Watson 1980 Gordon 1988). Dispersion modeling has also been used to explain the... 

Let c, be the concentration (in pg m-3) of element i(i = 1,2,..., n) at a specific site, and let fy be a fraction representing any modification to the source composition Ay due to atmospheric processes (e.g., gravitational settling) that occurs between the source and the receptor points. Then/y Ay will be the fraction of species i in the particulate concentrations from source j at the receptor. If sj is the total contribution (in pgm-3) of the particles from source j to the particulate concentration at the receptor site, we can express the concentration of element i at the site as... 

A nicotinic acetylcholine receptor point mutation (Y151S) conferring insecticide resistance causes reduced agonist potency to a range of neonicotinoids (N. S. Millar, Univ. College London, UK)... 

AN ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION MODEL is a mathematical expression relating the emission of material into the atmosphere to the downwind ambient concentration of the material. The heart of the matter is to estimate the concentration of a pollutant at a particular receptor point by calculation from some basic information about the source of the pollutant and the meterological conditions. 

The total faeility individual risk is then the sum of aU the event risks at a receptor point. Repeating the proeess at different receptor points wUl generate a risk curve, where risk generally deereases with increasing distance from the risk source. The units of this risk measure can be expressed as the annual chance that a person living near the hazardous facility might die due to potential accidents in that facility. (The MIACC risk acceptability guidelines are for a specific receptor location and not for a specific receptor that may spend some of his or her time away from that receptor location. Hence, the risk calculation should also assume continuous exposure of the receptor.)... 

The fixed-limit method consists of comparing the estimated average (or maximum) hazard level to which a receptor is exposed against fixed limits which are available from the hter-ature. For example, for toxic clouds, estimated concentration levels can be compared to IDLH (immediately dangerous to life and health) levels to establish whether fatality or serious injury might occur at a receptor point. Table 10.6 contains the commonly used fixed-limit viues for some toxie materials and for fires and explosions. 

To apply this method, a hazard load L is estimated at each receptor point ... 

L = i C dt for toxic clouds (C is the time-varying concentration at the receptor point,... 

Calculate load, PROBIT, and probability of effect (although we have focused on fatality as the effect of interest, injury or other effects such as property damage can also readily be estimated using the methods described here) at each receptor point (also called event individual consequence). 

The API (1996) method was originally developed for flare analysis, but is now applied to jet fires arising from accidental releases. Flare models apply to gas releases from nozzles with vertical flames. For accidental releases, the release hole is typically not a nozzle, and the resulting flame is not always vertical. For the modeling approaches presented here, the assumption will be made that the release hole can be approximated as a nozzle. The asstomption of a vertical flame will provide a conservative result, since the vertical flame will provide the largest radiant heat flux at any receptor point. 

---