Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reactor perturbed

In reactor perturbation theory, the neutron importance 0+ is the adjoint flux obtained by interchanging rows and columns in the neutron-flux matrix operator and solving. The resulting solution is orthogonal to the flux. [Pg.226]

Normally when a small change is made in the condition of a reactor, only a comparatively small change in the response occurs. Such a system is uniquely stable. In some cases, a small positive perturbation can result in an abrupt change to one steady state, and a small negative perturbation to a different steady condition. Such multiplicities occur most commonly in variable temperature CSTRs. Also, there are cases where a process occurring in a porous catalyst may have more than one effectiveness at the same Thiele number and thermal balance. Some isothermal systems likewise can have multiplicities, for instance, CSTRs with rate equations that have a maximum, as in Example (d) following. [Pg.2089]

Nuclear PSAs contain considerable uncertainty associated with the physical and chemical processes involved in core degradation, movement of the molten core in the reactor vessel, on the containment floor, and the response of the containment to the stresses placed upon it. The current models of these processes need refinement and validation. Because the geometry is greatly changed by small perturbations after degradation has commenced, it is not clear that the phenomcn.i can be treated. [Pg.380]

An Experimental Study Using Feed Perturbations for a Free-Radically Initiated Homogeneous Polymerization in a Continuous-Flow Stirred-Tank Reactor... [Pg.253]

The influence of changes in these other variables on MWD in a homopolymerization has not yet been tested, but whatever perturbations are introduced to the feed in a radical polymerization in a laboratory-scale CSTR, they are unlikely to introduce dramatic changes in the MWD of the product because of the extremely short life-time of the active propagating chains in relation to the hold-up time of the reactor. This small change in MWD could be advantageous in a radically initiated copolymerization where perturbations in monomer feeds could give control over polymer compositions independent of the MWD. This postulate is being explored currently. [Pg.264]

The rabbit and l5mx problem does have stable steady states. A stable steady state is insensitive to small perturbations in the system parameters. Specifically, small changes in the initial conditions, inlet concentrations, flow rates, and rate constants lead to small changes in the observed response. It is usually possible to stabilize a reactor by using a control system. Controlhng the input rate of lynx can stabilize the rabbit population. Section 14.1.2 considers the more realistic control problem of stabilizing a nonisothermal CSTR at an unstable steady state. [Pg.521]

The cluster reactor is attached to the pulsed cluster source s condensation channel, as shown in Figure 6. (16) To it is attached a high-pressure nozzle from which a helium/hydrocarbon mixture is pulsed into the reactor at a time selected with respect to the production and arrival of the clusters. The effect of turbulent mixing with the reactant pulse perturbs the beam, but clusters and reaction products which survive the travel from the source to the photoionization regime ( 600y sec) and the photoionization process are easily detected. [Pg.120]

In summary, the results from the fixed bed reactor study provided evidence as to the effect of Au and KOAc on the performance of the catalyst, though, these experiments did not give any information on the perturbation of the reaction pathways with the addition of Au and KOAc. For this type of information, additional experiments were performed using the TAP reactor with 1,2 C-labeled ethylene used as an isotopic tracer of the kinetics. [Pg.192]

Conversion efficiencies of the dynamometer-aged catalysts were measured in a standard A/F sweep test on an engine dynamometer [6]. The sweep experiments were carried out at 450 and 85,000 h space velocity (volumetric basis standard conditions). The sweep ranged from 0.5 A/F lean of stoichiometry to 0.5 A/F rich of stoichiometry with imposed A/F perturbations of+.0.5 A/F at 1 Hz. After sweep evaluation, small samples of catalyst were renrroved from the front region of the brick for chemisorption and flow reactor experiments. [Pg.357]

The use of IR pulse technique was reported for the first time around the year 2000 in order to study a catalytic reaction by transient mode [126-131], A little amount of reactant can be quickly added on the continuous flow using an injection loop and then introduce a transient perturbation to the system. Figure 4.10 illustrates the experimental system used for transient pulse reaction. It generally consists in (1) the gas flow system with mass flow controllers, (2) the six-ports valve with the injection loop, (3) the in situ IR reactor cell with self-supporting catalyst wafer, (4) the analysis section with a FTIR spectrometer for recording spectra of adsorbed species and (5) a quadruple MS for the gas analysis of reactants and products. [Pg.121]

This approximation is valid to within 5% at this limit. Since the axial dispersion term itself may be viewed as a perturbation or correction term for real tubular reactors, errors of this magnitude in Q)l lead to relatively minor errors in the conversion predicted by the model. [Pg.402]

The APP technique, recently introduced [50, 51], uses a continuous stirring tank reactor (CSTR) and relies on the sequential perturbation of an oscillating... [Pg.197]

In a typical pulse experiment, a pulse of known size, shape and composition is introduced to a reactor, preferably one with a simple flow pattern, either plug flow or well mixed. The response to the perturbation is then measured behind the reactor. A thermal conductivity detector can be used to compare the shape of the peaks before and after the reactor. This is usually done in the case of non-reacting systems, and moment analysis of the response curve can give information on diffusivities, mass transfer coefficients and adsorption constants. The typical pulse experiment in a reacting system traditionally uses GC analysis by leading the effluent from the reactor directly into a gas chromatographic column. This method yields conversions and selectivities for the total pulse, the time coordinate is lost. [Pg.240]

System stability can also be analysed in terms of the linearised differential model equations. In this, new perturbation variables for concentration C and temperature T are defined. These are defined in terms of small deviations in the actual reactor conditions away from the steady-state concentration and temperature Css and Tss respectively. Thus... [Pg.113]

The experiments and the simulation of CSTR models have revealed a complex dynamic behavior that can be predicted by the classical Andronov-Poincare-Hopf theory, including limit cycles, multiple limit cycles, quasi-periodic oscillations, transitions to chaotic dynamic and chaotic behavior. Examples of self-oscillation for reacting systems can be found in [4], [17], [18], [22], [23], [29], [30], [32], [33], [36]. The paper of Mankin and Hudson [17] where a CSTR with a simple reaction A B takes place, shows that it is possible to drive the reactor to chaos by perturbing the cooling temperature. In the paper by Perez, Font and Montava [22], it has been shown that a CSTR can be driven to chaos by perturbing the coolant flow rate. It has been also deduced, by means of numerical simulation, that periodic, quasi-periodic and chaotic behaviors can appear. [Pg.244]

According to the Shilnikov s theorem, the reactor presents a chaotic behavior. In order to test the presence of a strange attractor, it is necessary to raise the value of xe ax to introduce a perturbation in the vector field around the homoclinic orbit. Taking xemax = 5, the results of the simulation are shown in Figure 18, where the sensitive dependence on initial conditions has been corroborated. [Pg.271]

For example, biotransformation of naphthalene in an operating actiyated sludge treatment system (after correction for abiotic processes) was modelled a priori by an elementary first-order (in naphthalene concentration) rate equation (24). The complex actiyated sludge system was perturbed by induction of sinusoidal naphthalene feed concentrations for eight sinusoidal frequencies while the naphthalene in the reactor offgas was measured eyery ten minutes. Abiotic fates (stripping, and sorption) were accounted for and... [Pg.26]

A second limiting physical/hydrodynamic case is the soil as a porous bed. Often others simulate undisturbed soils in the lab with soil columns, however we have chosen to use a slice of such a column a differential volume reactor (DVR)-as the experimental design (22). This approach offers advantages in the ability to develop a more spatially homogeneous system and also contributes to the perturbation/response analysis needed for systems identification. [Pg.28]

Figure 8. Response of first order biotransformation rate constants for naphthalene oxidation to naphthalene perturbation frequency in a continuous activated sludge biotreatinent reactor. Figure 8. Response of first order biotransformation rate constants for naphthalene oxidation to naphthalene perturbation frequency in a continuous activated sludge biotreatinent reactor.
Heinrichs, M. and Schneider, F. W. (1981). Relaxation kinetics of steady-states in the continuous flow stirred tank reactor. Response to small and large perturbations critical slowing down. J. Phys. Chem., 85, 2112-16. [Pg.237]

The flow reactor of Felton et al. (84) samples ambient air with a minimum degree of perturbation (Figure 7). Ambient air is drawn by a sample pump into a quartz tube that faces the prevailing wind. The UV/vis-transparent... [Pg.356]

Gas flow through the sampling orifice is of interest since its volume rate of flow determines the size of vacuum pumps necessary for the mass spectrometer. In addition, orifice flow behaves as a first-order removal process that can lead to erroneous kinetics if it is too large. The perturbation of flow in the reactor has been discussed in Section IV.B. [Pg.26]

The degree of variation around the steady state to which systems can be subjected such that it is possible to approximate them by using linear relationships (e.g. as in equation 7.24) differs from system to system. The dynamics of a highly non-linear reactor might be described satisfactorily by a linear analysis for perturbations of up to 3 per centother hand the dynamics of some distillation columns have been shown to remain reasonably linear in the face of variations of 25 per cent in some process variables00. [Pg.583]

In the first case (Figure 8a), the side walls are adiabatic, and the reactor height (2 cm) is low enough to make natural convection unimportant. The fluid-particle trajectories are not perturbed, except for the gas expansion at the beginning of the reactor that is caused by the thermal expansion of the cold gas upon approaching the hot susceptor. On the basis of the mean temperature, the effective Rayleigh number, Rat, is 596, which is less than the Rayleigh number of 1844 necessary for the existence of a two-dimensional, stable, steady-state solution with flow in the transverse direction that was computed for equivalent Boussinesq conditions (188). [Pg.237]

The plot of growth rate in Figure 8a shows that even without buoyancy-driven secondary flows, a considerable variation in the growth rate in the transverse direction exists. The decrease in the axial velocity near the side walls leads to both a shorter thermal entrance length and a greater depletion near the walls compared with the behavior in the middle of the reactor. These perturbations from two-dimensional behavior induced by the side walls extend away from the side walls to a distance about equal to the reactor height. Thus, two-dimensional models may not be sufficient to predict CVD reactor performance even in the absence of buoyancy-driven rolls. [Pg.239]


See other pages where Reactor perturbed is mentioned: [Pg.21]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.587]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.620]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.236]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.254 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info