Radicals terminators

This situation is expected to apply to radical termination, especially by combination, because of the high reactivity of the trapped radicals. Only one constant appears which depends on the diffusion of the polymer radicals, so it cannot cancel out and may be the source of a dependence of the rate constant on the extent of reaction or degree of polymerization. 

Modem real time instmmental methods permit analyses of unstable transient species and the free-radical intermediates as well. These methods have gready expanded the scope and power of VPO studies, but important basic questions remain unresolved. Another complication is the role of surface. Peroxide decompositions and radical termination reactions can occur on a surface so that, depending on circumstances, surfaces can have either an inhibiting or accelerating effect. Each surface has varying amounts of adventitious contaminants and also accumulates deposits during reaction. Thus no two surfaces are exactly alike and each changes with time. 

Initia.tors, The initiators most commonly used in emulsion polymerization are water soluble although partially soluble and oil-soluble initiators have also been used (57). Normally only one initiator type is used for a given polymerization. In some cases a finishing initiator is used (58). At high conversion the concentration of monomer in the aqueous phase is very low, leading to much radical—radical termination. An oil-soluble initiator makes its way more readily into the polymer particles, promoting conversion of monomer to polymer more effectively. 

Tertiary peroxyl radicals also produce chemiluminescence although with lower efficiencies. For example, the intensity from cumene autooxidation, where the peroxyl radical is tertiary, is a factor of 10 less than that from ethylbenzene (132). The chemiluminescent mechanism for cumene may be the same as for secondary hydrocarbons because methylperoxy radical combination is involved in the termination step. The primary methylperoxyl radical terminates according to the chemiluminescent reaction just shown for (36), ie, R = H. 

Although primary and secondary alkyl hydroperoxides are attacked by free radicals, as in equations 8 and 9, such reactions are not chain scission reactions since the alkylperoxy radicals terminate by disproportionation without forming the new radicals needed to continue the chain (53). Overall decomposition rates are faster than the tme first-order rates if radical-induced decompositions are not suppressed. 

Polymerization Kinetics of Mass and Suspension PVC. The polymerization kinetics of mass and suspension PVC are considered together because a droplet of monomer in suspension polymerization can be considered to be a mass polymerization in a very tiny reactor. During polymerization, the polymer precipitates from the monomer when the chain size reaches 10—20 monomer units. The precipitated polymer remains swollen with monomer, but has a reduced radical termination rate. This leads to a higher concentration of radicals in the polymer gel and an increased polymerization rate at higher polymerization conversion. 

The departure of dependence of Rp on the concentration of CHP from 0.5 order might be ascribed to induction decomposition of ROOH type to form ROO- radical, which has very low activity to initiate monomer polymerization [40], but can combine with the propagation chain radical to form the primary radical termination. For the same reason, the order of concentration of TBH was also lower than 0.5 when the TBH-DMT system was used as the initiator in MMA bulk polymerization. But in the BPO-DMT initiation system as shown in Table... 

According to cq. 1, the term/should take into account all side reactions that lead to loss of initiator or initiator-derived radicals. These include cage reaction of the initiator-derived radicals (3.2.8), primary radical termination (3.2.9) and transfer to initiator (3.2.10). The relative importance of these processes depends on monomer concentration, medium viscosity and many other factors. Thus/is not a constant and typically decreases with conversion (see 3.3.1.1.3 and 3.3.2.1.3). 

Primary radical termination may involve combination or disproportionation with the propagating radical. It is often assumed that small radicals give mainly combination even though direct evidence for this is lacking. Both pathways are observed for reaction of eyanoisopropyl radicals with PS (Scheme 3.14) (Section 7.4.3.2). The end group formed by combination is similar to that formed by head addition to monomer differing only in the orientation of the penultimate monomer unit. 

If the rate of addition to monomer is low, primary radical termination may achieve greater importance. For example, in photoinitiation by the benzoin ether 12 both a fast initiating species (13, high k) and a slow initiating species (14, low... 

Primary radical termination is also of demonstrable significance when very high rates of initiation or very low monomer concentrations are employed. It should be noted that these conditions pertain in all polymerizations at high conversion and in starved feed processes. Some syntheses of telechelics are based on this process (Section 7.5.1). Reversible primary radical termination by combination with a persistent radical is the desired pathway in many forms of living radical polymerization (Section 9.3). 

The concentration of monomers in the aqueous phase is usually very low. This means that there is a greater chance that the initiator-derived radicals (I ) will undergo side reactions. Processes such as radical-radical reaction involving the initiator-derived and oligomeric species, primary radical termination, and transfer to initiator can be much more significant than in bulk, solution, or suspension polymerization and initiator efficiencies in emulsion polymerization are often very low. Initiation kinetics in emulsion polymerization are defined in terms of the entry coefficient (p) - a pseudo-first order rate coefficient for particle entry. 

Transfer to initiator can be a major complication in polymerizations initiated by diacyl peroxides. The importance of the process typically increases with monomer conversion and the consequent increase in the [initiator] [monomer] ratio.9 105160 162 In BPO initiated S polymerization, transfer to initiator may be lire major chain termination mechanism. For bulk S polymerization with 0.1 M BPO at 60 °C up to 75% of chains are terminated by transfer to initiator or primary radical termination (<75% conversion).7 A further consequence of the high incidence of chain transfer is that high conversion PS formed with BPO initiator tends to have a much narrower molecular weight distribution than that prepared with other initiators (e.g. AIBN) under similar conditions. 

Depending on the nature of the substituent R, the radical 76 (Scheme 3.53) may be slow to add to double bonds and primary radical termination can be a severe complication (see 3.2.9).30 40The problems associated with formation of a relatively stable radical are mitigated with certain tx-alkoxy (77) and a-alkanesulfonyl derivatives (79).280 In both cases the substituted benzyl radicals formed by a-scission (78 and 80 respectively) can themselves undergo a facile fragmentation to form a more reactive radical which is less likely to he involved in primary radical termination (Scheme 3.55, Scheme 3.56). 

The S-S linkage of disulfides and the C-S linkage of certain sulfides can undergo photoinduced homolysis. The low reactivity of the sulfur-centered radicals in addition or abstraction processes means that primary radical termination can be a complication. The disulfides may also be extremely susceptible to transfer to initiator (Ci for 88 is ca 0.5, Sections 6.2.2.2 and 9.3.2). However, these features are used to advantage when the disulfides are used as initiators in the synthesis of tel ec he lies295 or in living radical polymerizations. 96 The most common initiators in this context are the dithiuram disulfides (88) which are both thermal and photochemical initiators. The corresponding monosulfides [e.g. (89)J are thermally stable but can be used as photoinitiators. The chemistry of these initiators is discussed in more detail in Section 9.3.2. 

Primary radical termination involving alkyl radicals is described in Sections 2.5 and 7.4.3. Their reactions with monomers are also discussed in Sections 2.3 (fundamental aspects) and 4.5.4 (model propagation radicals). Their chemistry has been reviewed by Fischer and Radom/41 Giese,342,343 Tedder,344 Beckwith,345 Riichardt,76 and Tedder and Walton.346,347... 

The rate constants for benzoyloxy and phenyl radicals adding to monomer are high (> KF M-1 s for S at 60 CC - Table 3.7). In these circumstances primary radical termination should have little importance under normal polymerization conditions. Some kinetic studies indicating substantial primary radical termination during S polymerization may need to be re-evaluated in this light.161 Secondary benzoate end groups in PS with BPO initiator may arise by head addition or transfer to initiator (Section 8.2.1). 

NMR methods can be applied to give quantitative determination of initiator-derived and other end groups and provide a wealth of information on the polymerization process. They provide a chemical probe of the detailed initiation mechanism and a greater understanding of polymer properties. The main advantage of NMR methods over alternative techniques for initiator residue detection is that NMR signals (in particular nC NMR) are extremely sensitive to the structural environment of the initiator residue. This means that functionality formed by tail addition, head addition, transfer to initiator or primary radical termination, and various initiator-derived byproducts can be distinguished. 

The overall rate constant for radical-radical termination can be defined in terms of the rate of consumption of propagating radicals. Consider the simplified mechanism for radical polymerization shown in Scheme 5.4. 

Ideally, as long as the rate constants for reinitiation (AjT, AiM) are high with respect to that for propagation (kv), the transfer reactions should not directly affect the rate of polymerization and they need not be considered further in this section. The overall rate constant for radical-radical termination (A,) can be defined in terms of the rate of consumption of propagating radicals as shown in eq. I ... 

In dealing with radical-radical termination in bulk, polymerization it is common practice to divide the polymerization timeline into three or more conversion regimes.2 "0 The reason for this is evident from Figure 5.3. Within each regime, expressions for the termination rate coefficient are defined according to the dominant mechanism for chain end diffusion. The usual division is as follows ... 

Many emulsion polymerizations can be described by so-called zero-one kinetics. These systems are characterized by particle sizes that are sufficiently small dial entry of a radical into a particle already containing a propagating radical always causes instantaneous termination. Thus, a particle may contain either zero or one propagating radical. The value of n will usually be less than 0.4. In these systems, radical-radical termination is by definition not rate determining. Rates of polymerization are determined by the rates or particle entry and exit rather than by rates of initiation and termination. The main mechanism for exit is thought to be chain transfer to monomer. It follows that radical-radical termination, when it occurs in the particle phase, will usually be between a short species (one that lias just entered) and a long species. 

Microemulsion and miniemulsion polymerization processes differ from emulsion polymerization in that the particle sizes are smaller (10-30 and 30-100 nm respectively vs 50-300 ran)77 and there is no discrete monomer droplet phase. All monomer is in solution or in the particle phase. Initiation usually takes place by the same process as conventional emulsion polymerization. As particle sizes reduce, the probability of particle entry is lowered and so is the probability of radical-radical termination. This knowledge has been used to advantage in designing living polymerizations based on reversible chain transfer (e.g. RAFT, Section 9.5.2)." 2... 

It remains a common misconception that radical-radical termination is suppressed in processes such as NMP or ATRP. Another issue, in many people s minds, is whether processes that involve an irreversible termination step, even as a minor side reaction, should be called living. Living radical polymerization appears to be an oxymoron and the heading to this section a contradiction in terms (Section 9.1.1). In any processes that involve propagating radicals, there will be a finite rate of termination commensurate with the concentration of propagating radicals and the reaction conditions. The processes that fall under the heading of living or controlled radical polymerization (e.g. NMP, ATRP, RAFT) provide no exceptions. 

Serelis and Solomon108 found that primary radical termination of oligo(MAN) radicals (16) with 15 also gives predominantly combination. The ratio kllt/klc was found to have little, if any, dependence on the oligomer chain length (n<4). As with PMMA, disproportionation involves preferential abstraction of a methyl... 

A substantial number of studies give information on kJkK for polymerizations of S (5.2.2.2.1) and MMA (5.2,2.2.2). There has been less work oil other systems. One of the main problems in assessing kjk lies with assessing the importance of other termination mechanisms (i.e. transfer to initiator, solvent, etc., primary radical termination). 

The nature of the termination reaction in MMA polymerization has been investigated by a number of groups using a wide range of techniques (Tabic 5.5), There is general agreement that there is substantial disproportionation. However, there is considerable discrepancy in the precise values of k tk. In some cases the difference has been attributed to variations in the way molecular weight data are interpreted or to the failure to allow for other modes of termination under the polymerization conditions (chain transfer, primary radical termination).154 In other eases the reasons for the discrepancies are less clear. MALDI-TOF mass... 

Early reports37 157 167 suggested that termination during VAc polymerization involved predominantly disproportionation. However, these investigations did not adequately allow for the occurrence of transfer to monomer and/or polymer, which are extremely important during VAc polymerization (Sections 6.2.6.2 and 6.2.7.4 respectively). These problems were addressed by Bamford et who used the gelation technique (Section 5.2.2,2) to show that the predominant radical-radical termination mechanism is combination (25 °C). 

---