Controlled radical polymerizations termination

Two relatively new techniques, matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-lime of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) and electrospray ionization (FS1), offer new possibilities for analysis of polymers with molecular weights in the tens of thousands. PS molecular weights as high as 1.5 million have been determined by MALDI-TOF. Recent reviews on the application of these techniques to synthetic polymers include those by Ilantoif54 and Nielen.555 The methods have been much used to provide evidence for initiation and termination mechanisms in various forms of living and controlled radical polymerization.550 Some examples of the application of MALDI-TOF and ESI in end group determination are provided in Table 3.12. The table is not intended to be a comprehensive survey. 

It remains a common misconception that radical-radical termination is suppressed in processes such as NMP or ATRP. Another issue, in many people s minds, is whether processes that involve an irreversible termination step, even as a minor side reaction, should be called living. Living radical polymerization appears to be an oxymoron and the heading to this section a contradiction in terms (Section 9.1.1). In any processes that involve propagating radicals, there will be a finite rate of termination commensurate with the concentration of propagating radicals and the reaction conditions. The processes that fall under the heading of living or controlled radical polymerization (e.g. NMP, ATRP, RAFT) provide no exceptions. 

Like all controlled radical polymerization processes, ATRP relies on a rapid equilibration between a very small concentration of active radical sites and a much larger concentration of dormant species, in order to reduce the potential for bimolecular termination (Scheme 3). The radicals are generated via a reversible process catalyzed by a transition metal complex with a suitable redox manifold. An organic initiator (many initiators have been used but halides are the most common), homolytically transfers its halogen atom to the metal center, thereby raising its oxidation state. The radical species thus formed may then undergo addition to one or more vinyl monomer units before the halide is transferred back from the metal. The reader is directed to several comprehensive reviews of this field for more detailed information. 

While in most of the reports on SIP free radical polymerization is utihzed, the restricted synthetic possibihties and lack of control of the polymerization in terms of the achievable variation of the polymer brush architecture limited its use. The alternatives for the preparation of weU-defined brush systems were hving ionic polymerizations. Recently, controlled radical polymerization techniques has been developed and almost immediately apphed in SIP to prepare stracturally weU-de-fined brush systems. This includes living radical polymerization using nitroxide species such as 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidin-l-oxyl (TEMPO) [285], reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization mainly utilizing dithio-carbamates as iniferters (iniferter describes a molecule that functions as an initiator, chain transfer agent and terminator during polymerization) [286], as well as atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) were the free radical is formed by a reversible reduction-oxidation process of added metal complexes [287]. All techniques rely on the principle to drastically reduce the number of free radicals by the formation of a dormant species in equilibrium to an active free radical. By this the characteristic side reactions of free radicals are effectively suppressed. 

The need to better control surface-initiated polymerization recently led to the development of controlled radical polymerization techniques. The trick is to keep the concentration of free radicals low in order to decrease the number of side reactions. This is achieved by introducing a dormant species in equilibrium with the active free radical. Important reactions are the living radical polymerization with 2,2,4,4-methylpiperidine N-oxide (TEMPO) [439], reversible addition fragment chain transfer (RAFT) which utilizes so-called iniferters (a word formed from initiator, chain transfer and terminator) [440], and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) [441-443]. The latter forms radicals by added metal complexes as copper halogenides which exhibit reversible reduction-oxidation processes. 

Controlled radical polymerization (CRP) is an attractive tool, because of the resultant controllability of polymerization, and because of it being a versatile method to synthesize of well-defined polymer hybrids. The three main radical polymerization techniques, ATRP, NMP, and RAFT polymerization, have thus been employed. Other techniques, such as the oxidation of borane groups, have also been studied. In general, using CRP techniques, block copolymers can be synthesized from terminally functionalized PO as PO macroinitiator, and block copolymers can be prepared from functionalized PO produced by the copolymerization of olefins with functional monomers. 

Nitroxide mediated polymerization (NMP) is another type of controlled radical polymerization technique used to synthesize polymer hybrids. It relies on the reversible trapping of growing macro-radicals by nitroxide to form dormant species in which the C-ON covalent bond is thermally cleavaged (Fig. 19). At a polymerization temperature, the equilibrium between dormant and active species is strongly shifted to the dormant side, which Emits the irreversible chain termination reaction. 

Metallic copper, Cu(0), can also be employed for controlled radical polymerization in the absence or presence of copper ) or copper halides.126 129 Cu-(0) is most probably converted in situ into an active Cu species via abstraction of halogen from the initiator and the polymer terminal or from added copper ) or copper halides. The use of Cu(0) as an accelerator or reducing agent of Cu(II) species will be discussed later (section II.D). 

A series of a-halopropionates (1-21 and 1-22, X = Cl, Br), model compounds of the dormant polymer terminal of acrylates, are suitable for not only acrylates but also styrenes and acrylamides. Ethyl 2-chlo-ropropionate (1-21, X = Cl) was employed for the controlled radical polymerizations of MA and styrene catalyzed by CuCl/L-1 to afford relatively narrow MWDs (MwIMn 1.5).84 A better controlled polymerization of MA is achieved with the bromides 1-21 and 1-22 (X = Br) in conjunction with CuBr/L-1 to give narrower MWDs (MJMn 1.2).84 A similar result was obtained with the combination of 1-23 and CuBr/L-1 for the polymerization of styrene.166 A nickel-based system with Ni-2 and 1-21 (X = Br) gave another controlled polymerization of nBA.134 The iodide compound 1-21 (X = I) is specifically effective in conjunction with an iodide complex such as Re-1 to induce controlled polymerization of styrene.141... 

Bromoisobutyrate 1-24 (X = Br), a unimer model of poly(methacrylate) with a dormant C—Br terminal, is more versatile for various monomers such as methacrylates, acrylates, and styrenes various metal complexes including Ru, Fe, Cu, and Ni can be employed in this case. Living or controlled radical polymerization of MMA was successfully done with 1-24 (X = Br) coupled with ruthenium,56 iron,7071... 

II) species generated via irreversible termination of the growing or the initiating radical species. A similar fast polymerization is possible with CuBr2 in the presence of Cu(0). This allows the controlled radical polymerization even in the presence of oxygen or without purification of the monomer, where Cu(0) and Fe(0) can reduce the generated Cu(II) and Fe-... 

The polymerization was found to proceed smoothly to high conversions. The time dependence of logarithmic initial-to-current monomer concentration ratio ln(mo/m) is linear (Figure 2, curve 1), thus indicating the absence of chain termination processes, as case inherent in polymerization proceeding in the living mode. MW of the obtained polymers increases linearly with the conversion (Figure 2). The polydispersity indexes somewhat decrease with the conversion, a fact that is also typical of controlled radical polymerization. GPC... 

In any processes that involve propagating radicals, there will be a finite rate of termination commensurate with the concentration of propagating radicals and the reaction conditions. The processes that fall under the heading of living or controlled radical polymerization (e.g. NMP, ATRP, RAFT) provide no exceptions. 

Since the discovery of living polymerizations by Swarc in 1956 [1], the area of synthesis and application of well-defined polymer structures has been developed. The livingness of a polymerization is defined as the absence of termination and transfer reactions during the course of the polymerization. If there is also fast initiation and chain-end fidelity, which are prerequisites for the so-called controlled polymerization, well-defined polymers are obtained that have a narrow molar mass distribution as well as defined end groups. Such well-defined polymers can be prepared by various types of living and controlled polymerization techniques, including anionic polymerization [2], controlled radical polymerization [3-5], and cationic polymerization [6, 7]. 

This is therefore the practical requirement for the synthesis of well-defined polymers, such that complete monomer conversion can be reached and the chain ends can be quantitatively functionalized. However, since chain breaking reactions are actually present, such systems are more appropriately labeled controlled polymerizations rather than living polymerizations. In fact, conditions have recently been established for controlled radical polymerizations, even though it is impossible to avoid bimolecu-lar termination [12-20]. The extent of the Tivingness or controllability of a polymerization can be ranked if the individual or relative rate constants of propagation, transfer and termination are known [10, 11]. 

The control of free-radical polymerization has been one of the central interests in the field of macromolecular synthesis because free-radical polymerization is widely applicable to various vinyl monomers, is highly tolerant of water in contrast to ionic polymerization, and is therefore very important for the commerical production of polymeric materials. However, bimolecular terminations such as radical coupling and disproportionation, inherent to free-radical polymerization, prohibit uniform growth of macromolecules. Therefore, examples of controlled radical polymerization to give narrow MWD polymers are limited. 

Although the previously described polymerization with organocobalt porphyrins (7) is the first example of controlled radical polymerization, the applicability of this system is only limited to acrylic esters (20). Use of 7 for free-radical polymerization of methacrylic esters (21) results in a chain-transfer reaction with respect to the a-methyl group, to give oligomers with terminal unsaturation. 

---