Beta spins

Spin orbitals arc grouped in pairs for an KHF ealetilation, Haeti mem her of ih e pair dilTcrs in its spin function (one alpha and one beta), hilt both must share the same space function. For X electrons, X/2 different in olecu lar orbitals (space function s larc doubly occupied, with one alpha (spin up) and one beta (spin down) electron forming a pair. 

HyperChem tjuantum tn ech an ics calcu lation s tn ust start with the number of electrons (N) and how many of them have alpha spins (th e remain in g electron s have beta spin s ). HyperCh em obtain s th is in form ation from the charge an d spin m u Itiplicity th at you specify in th e Sem i-em pirical Op lion s dialog box or. Ab Initio Option s dialog box. is th en computed by coun ting the electron s (valence electrons in sem i-em pirical methods and all electrons in a/ irti/io m ethod) associated with each (assumed neutral) atom and... 

Con versely, an imre.vtrtctcrf Hartree-Fock description implies that there are two different sets of spatial molecular orbitals those molecular orbitals, occupied by electrons of spin up (alpha spin ) and those molecular orbitals, occupied by electrons of spin down (beta spin) as shown next. 

The two equations couple because the alpha Fock matrix depends on both the alpha and the beta solutions, C and cP (and sim ilarly for the beta Fock matrix). The self-consistent dependence of the Fock matrix on molecular orbital coefficients is best represen ted, as before, via the den sity matrices an d pP, wh ich essen -tially state the probability of describing an electron of alpha spin, and the probability of finding one of beta spin ... 

This is more natural, since our intuition is usually based on having a region of space which describes the location (more or less) of two electrons, one of alpha spin and one of beta spin. Some of quantum chemistry is formulated entirely in terms of spin orbitals, for various reasons. For our purposes, we will work entirely in the spatial orbital basis. This will cause things to get somewhat murky soon, but in the long run it will be simpler. 

The Cl-gradient (i H 0) is constructed using the determinant based direct technique of Olsen et al. [32] The advantage of using a determinant based formalism is that alpha and beta spins can be treated separately which reduces the dimensionality of the problem considerably. 

Direct Cl methods often require an index vector which points to a list of all allowed excitations from a given iV-electron basis function. Using alpha and beta strings, the index vector need not be the length of the Cl vector—its size is dictated by the number of alpha or beta strings, which (for a full Cl) is approximately the square root of the number of determinants. This results from the fact that in determinant-based Cl, electrons in alpha spin-orbitals can be excited only to other alpha spin-orbitals, and electrons in beta spin-orbitals can be excited only to other beta spin-orbitals (because of the restriction to a single value of Ms). 

Overlap integrals are neglected in the normalization factor. The usual notation of Slater determinants [6] is used here the bar denotes a beta spin-orbit). This diabatic state represents the ground state singlet spin pairing in the covalent C-H bond. The third electron on the catalyst is decoupled from this pair. 

Hartree Fock calculations carried out without restrictions on the spatial parts of the alpha and beta spin orbitals are referred to as unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) calculations. Often, it is useful to impose the condition that the alpha and beta spin... 

The energy gap between the alpha and beta spin states as the result of an applied, external magnetic field. 

Here Crj, Crk denote the respective LCAO coefficients of pr in an occupied (0y) or virtual (orbital energies ej, e. For open-shell systems, these quantities are computed separately for alpha and beta spin, with the occupancy factor 2 on the right-hand side of equation (48b) replaced by 1 for each occupied spin orbital. 

The nonrelativistic Hamiltonian (2.2.18) is a spin-free operator - that is, a spin tensor operator of zero rank see Section 2.3. Determinants of different spin projections therefore give vanishing Hamiltonian matrix elements and we may restrict the determinants of the Cl expansion to have the same spin projection. If the total number of electrons is N and the spin projection is M. the numbers of electrons with alpha and beta spins are given by... 

The determinants in the Cl expansion therefore have Na electrons of alpha spin and electrons of beta spin. With the alpha spin orbitals preceding the beta spin orbitals, each Slater (teterminant may be written as... 

In the time-consuming step of the A/ -resoIution method, we did not exploit the separation of excitation operators into alpha and beta spin parts as in (11.7.10). We shall now consider a different method that more fully exploits the separation into the alpha and beta spin spaces. This algorithm is known as the minimal operation-count (MOC) method [4] since it yields an operation count that, to leading orders in the numbers of electrons and orbitals, is identical to the theoretical minimum (11.7.16). 

For simplicity, we here transform only the orbitals that have alpha spin. The orbitals with beta spin may be included in the vector (11.9.3) with no complications except of notatirm. In each step, we generate a new set of determinants and determine a new set of Cl coefficients such that the identity... 

Except for the closed-shell CCSD theory of Section 13.7, the theory presented in this chapter has been that of spin-unrestricted coupled-cluster theory. Spin-unrestricted coupled-cluster theory has the advantage of conceptual simplicity and general applicability and is widely used for open-shell systems. Still, there are considerable disadvantages associated with the spin-unrestricted approach, making it worthwhile to look for an alternative approach for open-shell systems. First, spin-unrestricted coupled-cluster theory suffers from spin contamination, which may adversely affect the calculation of excitation processes and spin-dependent (magnetic) properties. Second, spin-unrestricted theory is expensive since, in the spin-orbital basis, we work with separate sets of orbitals for the alpha and beta spins. 

Similarly, the C=C—C=OI pattern of the beta spin set suggests unusually strong... 

From the expression for the spin-orbit operator (2.2.47), we note that the second-quantization representation of a mixed (spin and space) operator depends on both the spin of the electron and the functional form of the orbitals (2.2.48). For comparison, the pure spin operators in Section 2.2.2 are independent of the functional form of the orbitals, whereas the spin-ftee operators in Section 2.2.1 depend on the orbitals but have the same amplitudes (integrals) for alpha and beta spins. Mixed spin operators are treated in Exercises 2.1 and 2.2. 

The beta spin operator app corresponds to the component M = b since it removes an electron with spin projection — thereby increasing the spin projection of the system. 

Although Slater determinants are not by themselves spin eigenfunctions, it is possible to determine spin eigenfunctions as simple linear combinations of determinants. A clue to the procedure for generating spin-adapted determinants is obtained from the observation that both the total- and projected-spin operators commute with the sum of the ON operators for alpha and beta spins ... 

---