Quantification of Information

Information, /, is the difference between information entropies, viz the a priori information entropy, H, that characterizes the uncertainty before a message is obtained or an experiment is carried out, and the a posteriori information entropy, II, that remains afterwards  

In the case of m discrete phenomena x, (e.g., outputs of an experiment), the information entropy is calculated by means of the respective probabilities 

On the other hand, the information entropy characterizing the uncertainty of a continuous random quantity with a probability density p(x) is given by 

In the case that the information of chemical results x-, is imparted by signals Zj, then it holds for the entropy (Eckschlager and Danzer [1994]) 

When an unambiguous relationship exists between signal appearance and analytical result then Eq. (9.4) turns into Eq. (9.2). 

---

Kholodenko, B.N., Hoek, J.B., Westerhofif, H.V. and Brown, G.C. (1997b) Quantification of information transfer via cellular signal transduction pathways. FEBS Lett. 414, 430 34. 

Information is physical as Landauer declares. And the most accessible handles are digital, statistical, and structure dependent in nature. These properties are critical to the quantification of information presented in Chapter 2. 

The mass spectrometer (ms) is a common adjunct to a chromatographic system (see Mass spectrometry). The combination of a gas chromatograph for component separation and a mass spectrometer (gc/ms) for detection and identification of the separated components is a powerful tool, particularly when the data are collected usiag an on-line data-handling system. QuaUtative information inherent ia the separation can be coupled with the identification of stmcture and relatively straightforward quantification of a mixture s components. 

As mentioned above, the interpretation of CL cannot be unified under a simple law, and one of the fundamental difficulties involved in luminescence analysis is the lack of information on the competing nonradiative processes present in the material. In addition, the influence of defects, the surface, and various external perturbations (such as temperature, electric field, and stress) have to be taken into account in quantitative CL analysis. All these make the quantification of CL intensities difficult. Correlations between dopant concentrations and such band-shape parameters as the peak energy and the half-width of the CL emission currently are more reliable as means for the quantitative analysis of the carrier concentration. 

Technique Primary probe Elemental range Type of information Depth of information Lateral resolution Sensitivity (at. %) Ease of quantification Insulator analysis Destructive UHV environment... 

In any given situation, there may be different levels of dependence between an operator s performance on one task and on another because of the characteristics of the tasks theraseb e.s. or because of the manner in which the operator was cued to perform the tasks. Dependence levels between the performances of two (or more) operators also may differ. The analyses should account for dependency in human-error probabilities. In addition, each sequence may have a set of human recovery actions that if successfully performed will terminate or reduce the consequences of the sequence. This information, coupled with a knowledge of the system success criteria leads to the development of human success and failure probabilities which are input to the quantification of the fault iices or event trees. With this last step, the HRA is integrated into the PSA, and Pl. ise 4 is complete. 

The development of the HRA event tree is one of the most critical parts of the quantification of human error probabilities. If the task analysis lists the possible human error events in the order of ihcir potential occurrence, the transfer of this information to the HRA event tree is fadlitutcd. Each potential eiTor and success is represented as a binary branch on the HRA event tiec. with subsequent errors and successes following directly from the immediately preceding ones. Cure should be taken not to omit the errors that are not included in the task analysis table but might affect the probabilities listed in the table. For example, administrative control errors that affect a task being performed may not appear in the task analysis table but must be included in the HRA event tree. 

Although the diffraction techniques are unique in providing detailed information on the structural organization at the molecular level in the different crystalline forms, there are other characterization techniques which are sensitive to the chain conformation and in some cases to the chain packing, which can be used advantageously (and in some case more efficiently than diffraction techniques) in the recognition and quantification of the different polymorphs in polymeric materials. 

All of the information obtained in this research area depends upon indirect evidence through the use of nonisotopic carriers or normalized data in the form of ratios. These are subject to error but the trends and insights that have been obtained are very useful to the description of the behavior of plutonium in the environment. Better thermodynamic data in the range of environmental concentrations would be helpful in further quantification of chemical species, as would phenomenalogical descriptions of the behavior of plutonium in reasonably good models of the environment. 

Unfortunately these and other existing quality control procedures do not answer aU problems. There remains a clear need for development of PCR reference materials that win provide information both on quality and quantity levels. For quality the reference materials should be host-specific and PCR primers, for positive control, may correspond to host specific house keeping genes e.g. b-actin. For quantitative analysis, fluorescence dyes in specific primers might be used in order to measure accurately the amount of DNA present. Such practices, and other as yet un-realized procedures, will be needed to achieve reliable results in the quantification of DNA analysis. 

Applications Useful 2D NMR experiments for identification of surfactants are homonuclear proton correlation (COSY, TOCSY) and heteronuclear proton-carbon correlation (HETCOR, HMQC) spectroscopy [200,201]. 2D NMR experiments employing proton detection can be performed in 5 to 20 min for surfactant solutions of more than 50 mM. Van Gorkum and Jensen [238] have described several 2D NMR techniques that are often used for identification and quantification of anionic surfactants. The resonance frequencies of spin-coupled nuclei are correlated and hence give detailed information on the structure of organic molecules. 

Similarly, Overcash et al. [32] produced an engineering rule-of-practice-based analysis of separate unit processes used in manufacturing. The information is collated in the form of a unit process life cycle inventory, which then helps to evaluate the manufactured products through the quantification of various parameters, including input materials, energy requirements, material losses and machine variables. 

The inventory tasks is to collect environmentally important information about relevant processes involved in the product system. Inventory collects information about unit processes at first and subsequently, an inventory of inputs and outputs of the system and its surroundings is carried out. The goal is the identification and quantification of all elementary flows associated with product system. Inventory analysis is the nature of the technical implementation of LCA studies. It is an essential part of a study, has high demands for data availability, practical experience in modelling product systems and, in the case of using database tools, it is necessary to master them perfectly and to understand their function [46]. The inventory phase principle is data collection that is used to quantify values of the elementary flows. This phase represents a major practical part of the LCA study, time consuming and with demands for data availability and author s experience with modelling product system studies [47],... 

Huber, J.F.K., Kenndler, E., Reich, G. (1979). Quantification of the information content of multi-dimensional gas chromatography and low resolution mass spectrometry in the identification of doping drugs. J. Chromatogr. 172, 15-30. 

---