Quality improvement program evaluation

Continuous Quality Improvement and Evaluation of Expanded School Mental Health Programs... 

Most QI programs build upon an established quality assurance (QA) process. Quality assurance can be defined as a formal and systematic process in which problems in delivering health care are identified, solutions to the problems are developed and implemented, and follow-up monitoring then is carried out [30]. QA begins with problem identification. After possible sources of the problem are determined, solutions are developed and implemented. Then, the results of the intervention or solution are evaluated to determine whether or not the problem has been resolved. By incorporating a goal of continual improvement, a QA process can contribute to quality improvement activities. 

A number of programs have assessed the effect of the use of RFG on vehicle emissions the most comprehensive of these is the Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program. Their task of assessing the air quality benefits of RFGs was relatively difficult, compared to the other evaluations of control measures that have typically been undertaken for regulatory purposes.f ... 

Emphasize the connections between program evaluation, continuous program improvement, and quality assurance. 

Once the key questions have been articulated, it is important to consider the source of the information and how the data may be collected within resource constraints of the program. Effective program evaluation makes use of multiple data collection methods at multiple points in the program. Some of the methods used in existing programs to determine quality and design plans for continuous improvement are described here. These include document reviews, interviews, surveys, instructor reflections, expert reviews, and longitudinal studies. 

External quality assessment is organized as a part of quality assurance programs with the object of improving analytical quality and thereby contributes with possibilities for method evaluation making corrections on a continuous basis. The external quality assessment may include... 

There is often an absence of a central organization that has responsibility, authority, and accountability for highway safety. For example, in Israel a National Authority for Road Safety is supposed to coordinate all safety-related activities, but it has no authority over safety-related activities of the Ministry of Education, the National Traffic Police, the licensing administration, or the Ministry of Health. In the U.S. the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration was created in 1966 to improve traffic safety but the implementation of its recommended driver behavior and improvement programs is determined by the 50 individual states. Such decentralized safety systems lead to multiple uncoordinated efforts without a structured quality control process. In particular, by dissociating responsibility, authority, and accountability from each other motivation to evaluate and improve performance quickly dissipates. 

Actually, every chapter of this text has addressed program evaluation in one way or another. Early on, 1 explained the need for achievement-oriented methods to keep score of your safety efforts. This enables people to consider safety in the same work-to-achieve context as production and quality. This implies, of course, the need for program evaluation numbers people can xmderstand and learn from. This is how evaluation leads to continuous improvement. 

Quality improvement, broadly defined, is a systematic framework for investigating the reasons for service outcomes, thus setting the stage for further improvement (Chowanec, 1994, p. 792). Many different types of program evaluation and research methods, incorporating both qualitative and quantitative techniques, may be subsumed under the rubric of quality improvement (Hibbs, 1995). Including the... 

For many industrialized countries, efforts to improve the outdoor air quality have been under way for the majority of this century. In many locations around the world, significant improvements have taken place. Air quality in many major cities such as London, New York, and Chicago has improved from the conditions present in the first half of the twentieth century. Mechanisms and control programs are in place in the developed countries to continue the improvement of ambient air quality. Considerable effort and energy have been expended to characterize, evaluate, and control air pollution emissions to the atmosphere. 

In addition to these types of evaluations, the incident reporting and near miss systems should be monitored for improvements in performance that can be attributed to the program. On the basis of feedback from these and other sources such as changes in quality levels or efficiency, modifications should be made to the program to enhance and sustain its effectiveness. Concrete evidence regarding the benefits arising from the program should be communicated to those involved. 

---