Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Protocol system description

Before the initiation of this study, the protocol study description was given to the subjects and informed consent forms were completed. The protocol, informed consent form, and any other supportive materials relevant to the safety of the subjects were reviewed and approved by an institutional review board (IRB). No subject was admitted into the study who was using topical or systemic antimicrobials or any other medication known to affect the normal microbial flora of the skin. [Pg.285]

Many companies have specific protocols for the development and description of standard operating procedures. Like the management systems they detail, these SOPs vary considerably in terms of their otganization and level of detail. While it s clearly premature to develop a specific format within which PSM systems will be described, you can get useful ideas in advance by reviewing written protocols and existing SOPs. [Pg.70]

OS 79] ]R 17] ]no protocol] 4-Methoxybenzaldehyde and methyl diethoxyphos-phonoacetate were reacted by means of the Wittig-Horner-Emmons reaction [85] (see a more detailed description in [42]). A modified micro reaction system consisting of two mixers, for deprotonation of the phosphonates and introduction of the aldehyde, connected to an HPLC capillary of 0.8 m length and 0.25 mm diameter was employed. The micro reactor showed higher yields than laboratory batch synthesis. [Pg.534]

Reaction control is temperature-based, with the system trying to attain the adjusted maximum temperature as rapidly as possible. When employing polar reaction mixtures with a high level of absorption, the output power can be limited to a maximum of 150 W to avoid overheating of the sample. The instmments of the Emrys series come with a comprehensive software package for the creation of protocols, including an ISIS draw surface for graphical description of the reactions. [Pg.49]

The most interesting aspects of design involve partial descriptions of a group of objects and their interactions. For example, a trading system might involve a buyer, a seller, and a broker. Their behavior can be described in terms of their detailed interaction protocols or, more abstractly, in terms of a single high-level action, trade. [Pg.58]

Additional language in the preamble 15) to the GLP revisions of 1987 [4] as well as enforcement pohcies of individual FDA investigators have broadly interpreted the requirement to include the current status of each study on the master schedule. According to this view, the master schedule should include such study events as test article-mixture preparation, test system dosing, and in-hfe observation. Because such detailed information is usually available in other study documentation (e.g., protocol, study schedules), most laboratories hmit a description of current status to broad categories such as in-hfe phase, study terminated, report preparation, and report issuance. ... [Pg.62]

Before any method validation is started, the scope of validation must be fixed, comprising both the analytical system and the analytical requirement. A description of the analytical system includes the purpose and type of method, the type and concentration range of analyte(s) being measured, the types of material or matrices for which the method is applied, and a method protocol. On the basis of a good analysis lies a clear specification of the analytical requirement. The latter reflects the minimum fitness-for-purpose criteria or the different performance criteria the method must meet in order to solve the particular problem. For example, a minimum precision (RSD, see below) of 5% may be required or a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.1% (w/w) [2,4,15,58]. The established criteria for performance characteristics form the basis of the final acceptability of analytical data and of the validated method [58]. [Pg.759]

The test protocol typically has a general description of the system, the configurations, and the intended use. The test scripts in the test protocol provide detailed information of the testing procedures. In each test script, the following information should be provided ... [Pg.800]

Validation Team A well-defined validation team with a well-written description of responsibilities is required and assures the adequate realization of the validation tasks. A validation team should be composed by different responsibilities responsible-of-validation team, team leader, archive manager, test coordinator, quality assurance member, tester, and witness. The responsible-for-validation team elaborates and approves the VMP, protocols, and reports. The team leader should be responsible for the computer system validation and utilization. An archive manager is responsible for the management of all computer system validation documents. The test coordinator is responsible for the computer system test and coordinates the elaboration and operation of tests for evaluating the performance of the computer system. A quality assurance member is required to periodically inspect and train the personnel and review all the validation documents. The tester is responsible for the execution of the tests required to perform the validation protocol. The witness is responsible for observing and reviewing the operations of the tester. [Pg.835]

The PQ is the phase in which either a technical system is tested over a long period of time (e.g., water system), or a complex technical system is tested overall (connected filling line). For many systems OQ is the last phase performed during qualification. If there are only a few performance tests needed, it might be more practical to include them during OQ or process validation. Combining OQ and PQ decreases the number of documents (less documentation work in the future) and cuts approval time and effort. Again, the procedure for PQ is the same as for IQ and OQ ([develop PQ protocols, approve PQ protocols (by the quality assurance, production, and technical departments), perform PQ, work out the PQ report, and approve the PQ report (by the quality assurance, production, and technical departments)]. The documentation and test description are identical to those in the OQ phase. [Pg.495]

This approach was later extended to off-lattice models and a more detailed description of the transfer energy of the different amino acid residues [77]. Magainin, melit-tin, and several other amphipathic peptides were simulated. In these simulations, differences in the interaction of the peptides with the lipid phase were observed. For example, magainin only showed adsorption onto the lipid and no crossing of the lipid occurred, whereas melittin crossed the lipid and formed a stable transmembrane helix. These results are in full agreement with later studies reported by other research groups presented below, involving more elaborate simulation protocols and representations of the peptides and the lipid. These examples show the potential of computer simulations even when some simplifications have to be made to make the system computationally tractable. [Pg.324]

In the proteomic analysis of the brain, two-dimensional gels for protein separation, followed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for protein identification, have mainly been employed. This classical proteomics approach allows for the quantification of changes in protein levels and modifications. Simultaneously, it is a robust, well-established method that finds wide application in the study of biological systems. In this article, we provide a description of the protocols of the proteomic analysis used in our laboratory and a summary of the major findings from our group and other neuroproteomics groups. [Pg.280]

Every person who is responsible for any part of any GLP study must have the appropriate education, training, and experience, or combination thereof, to enable that person to perform the assigned functions. Each testing facility shall maintain up-to-date records of training, experience and job description for everyone involved in the conduct of a nonclinical laboratory study. There shall be adequate personnel to conduct the study according to the protocol who shall take appropriate precautions to avoid contamination of the test and control articles and the test systems. [Pg.1272]


See other pages where Protocol system description is mentioned: [Pg.267]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.1056]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.669]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.1274]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.473]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.69 ]




SEARCH



System description

© 2024 chempedia.info