Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Proteins at equilibrium

An independent method for demonstrating the involvement of carboxyl groups is based on the lower solid curve of the insert of Fig. 8 (a similar curve is shown in Fig. 7), which shows the difference between the instantaneous data (3-second) and the equilibrium (22-hour) data. Thus it should represent a product of two functions of pH ) the fraction of the total protein at equilibrium in which 36 groups have been liberated, and (2) the fraction of the new groups which combine with acid at the same... [Pg.189]

The concentration of the 10 states of the protein at equilibrium are related by the following expressions in which c is the ratio of the binding constants for the T and R states ... [Pg.192]

Let (pm = mole fraction of deuterium in protein at equilibrium and mole fraction of deuterium in heavy water at equilibrium. It is assumed that... [Pg.199]

For large molecules, such as proteins, the main method in use is a 2D technique, called NOESY (nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy). The basic experiment [33, 34] consists of tluee 90° pulses. The first pulse converts die longitudinal magnetizations for all protons, present at equilibrium, into transverse magnetizations which evolve diirhig the subsequent evolution time In this way, the transverse magnetization components for different protons become labelled by their resonance frequencies. The second 90° pulse rotates the magnetizations to the -z-direction. [Pg.1510]

Note that in equilibria (2) the subscripts per and cyt are omitted where substrate S is concerned. This is obvious when the binding is measured to a solubilized transport protein, but also in the case where the enzyme is embedded in the membrane of closed vesicular structures, internal and external substrate will have equal concentrations at equilibrium (see Eig. 5). Consequently, the binding is independent of the orientation of the enzyme in the membrane. [Pg.148]

Since lipophilic molecules have affinity for both the membrane lipid and the serum proteins, membrane retention is expected to decrease, by the extent of the relative lipophilicities of the drug molecules in membrane lipid versus serum proteins, and by the relative amounts of the two competitive-binding phases [see Eqs. (7.41)-(7.43)]. Generally, the serum proteins cannot extract all of the sample molecules from the phospholipid membrane phase at equilibrium. Thus, to measure permeability under sink conditions, it is still necessary to characterize the extent of membrane retention. Generally, this has been sidestepped in the reported literature. [Pg.197]

The ROA spectra of partially unfolded denatured hen lysozyme and bovine ribonuclease A, prepared by reducing all the disulfide bonds and keeping the sample at low pH, together with the ROA spectra of the corresponding native proteins, are displayed in Figure 5. As pointed out in Section II,B, the short time scale of the Raman scattering event means that the ROA spectrum of a disordered system is a superposition of snapshot ROA spectra from all the distinct conformations present at equilibrium. Because of the reduced ROA intensities and large... [Pg.91]

The reaction of X with S must be fast and reversible, close to if not at equilibrium with concentration of S. It can be that there is an intermediate step in which X binds to a protein kinase (a protein which phosphorylates other proteins mostly at histidine residues in bacteria) using phosphate transferred from ATP. It then gives XP which is the transcription factor, where concentration of S still decides the extent of phosphorylation. No change occurs in DNA itself. Here equilibrium is avoided as dephosphorylation involves a phosphatase, though changes must be relatively quick since, for example, cell cycling and division depend on these steps, which must be completed in minutes. We have noted that such mechanical trigger-proteins as transcription factors are usually based on a-helical backbones common to all manner of such adaptive conformational responses (Section 4.11). [Pg.228]

Proteins having one chromophore per molecule are the simplest and most convenient in studies of fluorescence decay kinetics as well as in other spectroscopic studies of proteins. These were historically the first proteins for which the tryptophan fluorescence decay was analyzed. It was natural to expect that, for these proteins at least, the decay curves would be singleexponential. However, a more complex time dependence of the emission was observed. To describe the experimental data for almost all of the proteins studied, it was necessary to use a set of two or more exponents.(2) The decay is single-exponential only in the case of apoazurin.(41) Several authors(41,42) explained the biexponentiality of the decay by the existence of two protein conformers in equilibrium. Such an explanation is difficult to accept without additional analysis, since there are many other mechanisms leading to nonexponential decay and in view of the fact that deconvolution into exponential components is no more than a formal procedure for treatment of nonexponential curves. [Pg.75]

The second generalization, developed mainly by Koshland, is based on the recognition that enzymes (like any protein) have a multitude of conformations at equilibrium. Since the ligand is likely to interact differently with the various conformations, one can expect a shift in the distribution of conformations induced by the binding process. This is the induced fit model. It states that the best fit (by either geometrical or by a complementary pattern) does not necessarily exist before... [Pg.255]

The binding of a small molecule ligand to a protein receptor follows a bimolecu-lar association reaction with second-order kinetics. For the reversible reaction of a ligand L and a protein P to form a non-covalendy bound complex C at equilibrium, Eq. (1) applies where kon and kgS represent the forward and reverse mass transfer rate constants. [Pg.69]

Fig. 2.3 Plots of the concentration of the protein-ligand complex present at equilibrium [CJ (pM, shown as pM) as a function of the binding constant (pM), with various initial concentrations of protein [P]q and ligand [1]. Note that the [CJ values are the concentrations of the protein-ligand complex just prior to the GPC spin... Fig. 2.3 Plots of the concentration of the protein-ligand complex present at equilibrium [CJ (pM, shown as pM) as a function of the binding constant (pM), with various initial concentrations of protein [P]q and ligand [1]. Note that the [CJ values are the concentrations of the protein-ligand complex just prior to the GPC spin...
It should also be noted that when the rate of change in the protein-ligand complex concentration is zero (by definition, when the system is at equilibrium), this equation reduces to the equilibrium expression below, with the binding affinity constant defined as the ratio of the dissociation rate koff to tho association rate kon-... [Pg.144]

Fig. 4.1 Schematic of the ASMS experiment format. In primary screening, several thousand compounds are included in a single tube and allo A/ed to equilibrate with the target protein under excess target concentration relative to individual compound ligands. The concentration of each compound is 1.5 pM relative to 5-10 pM target protein. Hence at equilibrium the amount of ligand bound is directly related to both the target concentration and the intrinsic /< of the ligand. Multiple rounds of... Fig. 4.1 Schematic of the ASMS experiment format. In primary screening, several thousand compounds are included in a single tube and allo A/ed to equilibrate with the target protein under excess target concentration relative to individual compound ligands. The concentration of each compound is 1.5 pM relative to 5-10 pM target protein. Hence at equilibrium the amount of ligand bound is directly related to both the target concentration and the intrinsic /< of the ligand. Multiple rounds of...
One asset of mass spectrometry in protein science is that ESI and MALDI [11, 75] can introduce noncovalent complexes to the gas phase [12, 76, 77]. If one can assume that the gas-phase ion abundances (peak intensities) for the complex, apo protein, and ligand are directly related to their equilibrium concentrations in solution, the relative and absolute binding affinities can be deduced [78-81]. Extended methods are now available that also make use of the intensity of the complex and the protein at high ligand concentration to determine binding constants [78, 82-84]. [Pg.358]


See other pages where Proteins at equilibrium is mentioned: [Pg.173]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.2961]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.349]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.265 ]




SEARCH



AT protein

At equilibrium

© 2024 chempedia.info