Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Proportional-Integral Controller PI

The Bode plot of this combination of an integrator and a first-order lead is shown in Fig. 13.13h, At low frequencies, a PI controller amplifies magnitudes and contributes —90° of phase-angle lag, This loss of phase angle is undesirable from a dynamic standpoint since it moves the Gj B polar plot closer to the ( — 1,0) point. [Pg.480]

The Bode plot for the lead-lag element is sketched in Fig. 13.13c. It contributes positive phase-angle advance over a range of frequencies between 1/tj, and l/arj,. [Pg.481]

The lead-lag clement can move the G, B curve away from the (—1,0) point and improve stability. When the derivative setting on a PID controller is tuned, the location of the phase-angle advance is shifted so that it occurs near the critical (— 1,0) point. [Pg.481]


Control Scheme Multiloop proportional integral controllers (PI)... [Pg.195]

PI (proportional-integral) control models, 160 Placement systems electronic components, 425-429 3D PCBs, 435-438... [Pg.2762]

To obtain a more uniform film, the design team could consider design changes and/or a control strategy. One approach is that described by Armaou and Christofides (1999), who adjust the concentration of silane as a function of the radial position in the showerhead. Using three PI (proportional-integral)-controllers to attain a near-uniform Si deposition rate at radial positions across the wafer, they show how to obtain a nearly uniform film. ... [Pg.666]

Proportional-integral control. The proportional-integral (or PI) mode is also often referred to as proportional plus reset since this control mode eliminates the offset associated with proportional control alone. The... [Pg.224]

A three point control configuration based on a proportional-integral controller with dynamic estimation of unknown disturbances was implemented in a Petlyuk column. The proposed controller comprises three feedback terms proportional, integral and quadratic actions. The first two terms act in a similar manner as the classical PI control law, while the quadratic term (double integral action) accounts for the dynamic estimation of unknown disturbances. Comparison with the classical PI control law was carried out to analyze the performance of the proposed controller in face to unknown feed disturbances and set point changes. The results show that the closed-loop response of the Petlyuk column is significantly improved with the proposed controller. [Pg.515]

The control of a Petlyuk column with a proportional-integral controller with dynamic estimation of uncertainties was analyzed. The dynamic behavior of this action was compared to the Petlyuk column performance under a proportional-integral controller. Set point tracking and responses to feed composition disturbances were analyzed. The results obtained for three case studies show that, after optimizing the controller parameters of each control policy, the closed loop behavior under the Ptf control mode was significantly better than the responses obtained with a PI controller. The superiority of the PII control option was particularly noticeable when the column was subjected to feed disturbances. The properties of the PII controller allow a proper detection of disturbances and a proper corrective action to prevent the controlled output from significant deviations from the desired operation point. In general, the Ptf controller has been found to have an excellent potential for the control of the Petlyuk column. [Pg.520]

Control scheme. Conventional control schemes rely on a simple proportional, integral algorithm (PI). This technique is not optimal when active and passive areas exist simultaneously. The use of this... [Pg.937]

Proportional-Integral Controller. A proportional-integral (PI) controller has the transfer function,... [Pg.258]

ProportionaJ-plus-Integral (PI) Control Integral action eliminates the offset described above by moving the controller output at a rate proportional to the deviation from set point. Although available alone in an integral controller, it is most often combined with proportional action in a PI controller ... [Pg.726]

Proportional integral (PI) control A control algorithm that combines the proportional response and integral response control algorithms. [Pg.1469]

Proportional integral derivative (PID) control A control algorithm that enhances the PI control algorithm by adding a component that is proportional to the rate of change of the deviation of the controlled variables. [Pg.1469]

In practice, integral action is never used by itself. The norm is a proportional-integral (PI) controller. The time-domain equation and the transfer function are ... [Pg.85]

The state feedback gain including integral control K is [0 1.66 -4.99], Unlike the simple proportional gain, we cannot expect that Kn+1 = 4.99 would resemble the integral time constant in classical PI control. To do the time domain simulation, the task is similar to the hints that we provide for Example 7.5B in the Review Problems. The actual statements will also be provided on our Web Support. [Pg.180]

The combination of the two control modes is called the proportional plus reset (PI) control mode. It combines the immediate output characteristics of a proportional control mode with the zero residual offset characteristics of the integral mode. [Pg.142]

D. COMMERCIAL CONTROLLERS. The three actions described above are used individually or combined in commercial controllers. Probably 60 percent of all controllers are PI (proportional-integral), 20 percent are PID (proportional-integral-derivativc) and 20 percent are P-only (proportional). We will discuss the reasons for selecting one type over another in Sec. 7.2. [Pg.226]

C. PROPORTIONAL-INTEGRAL (PI) CONTROLLER. Most control loops use PI controllers. The integral action eliminates steadystate error in T (see Fig. 7.11c). The smaller the integral time r, the faster the error is reduced. But the system becomes more underdamped as t( is reduced. If it is made too small, the loop becomes unstable. [Pg.230]

As discussed in Chap. 7, the three common commercial feedback controllers are proportional (P), proportionaMntegral (PI) and proportional-integral-derivative (PID), The transfer functions for these devices are developed below. [Pg.329]

The dynamic stability of the quasi steady-state process suggests that active control of the CZ system has to account only for random disturbances to the system about its set points and for the batchwise transient caused by the decreasing melt volume. Derby and Brown (150) implemented a simple proportional-integral (PI) controller that coupled the crystal radius to a set point temperature for the heater in an effort to control the dynamic CZ model with idealized radiation. Figure 20 shows the shapes of the crystal and melt predicted without control, with purely integral control, and with... [Pg.100]

Fig. 6.4 Temporal behavior of the normalized signal S when a glucose pulse is applied, increasing the glucose from 5 mM to 10 mM and lasting for 60 min. The PI control features are clearly seen, starting with a rapid proportional response, followed by a slow integral control. Increasing the time constant k-, responsible for the integral control, results in a faster saturation of the response. The smallest and maximal value of the active fraction is Xq = 0.2 and Xmax = 0-8 respectively. Fig. 6.4 Temporal behavior of the normalized signal S when a glucose pulse is applied, increasing the glucose from 5 mM to 10 mM and lasting for 60 min. The PI control features are clearly seen, starting with a rapid proportional response, followed by a slow integral control. Increasing the time constant k-, responsible for the integral control, results in a faster saturation of the response. The smallest and maximal value of the active fraction is Xq = 0.2 and Xmax = 0-8 respectively.
The design of the fast distributed controllers for the individual units can, in general, be addressed as a collection of individual control problems, where the strictness of the operational requirements for each unit dictates the complexity of the corresponding controller typical applications rely on the use of simple linear controllers, e.g., proportional (P), proportional-integral (PI) or proportional-integral-derivative (PID). [Pg.43]

On the other hand, conventional control approaches also rely on models, but they are usually not built into the controller itself. Instead the models form the basis of simulations and other analysis methods that guide in the selection of control loops and suggest tuning constants for the relatively simple controllers normally employed [PI, PID, I-only. P-only, lead-lag compensation, etc. (P = proportional, PI = proportional-integral, PID = proportional-integral-derivative)]. Conventional control approaches attempt to build the smarts into the system (the process and the controllers.) rather than only use complex control algorithms. [Pg.10]


See other pages where Proportional-Integral Controller PI is mentioned: [Pg.479]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.1342]    [Pg.1342]    [Pg.697]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.735]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.580]    [Pg.15]   


SEARCH



Control integrity

Integral control

Integral controller

Integrated controls

Integration control

PI control

PI controller

Proportional control

Proportional controller

Proportional integral

Proportional-integral controller

© 2024 chempedia.info