Production Rule System

JBoss Rules is more correctly classified as a production rule system, which works with a memory of current states and details of a problem, a rule base, and an interpreter (i.e., inference engine), which applies the rules to each fact entering the memory. The system implements both Rete and leaps pattern-matching algorithms. Rules are stored in the production memory, and the facts that the inference engine matches against are stored in the working memory. A typical syntax is as follows ... 

JBoss Rules is an open-source production rule system designed for implementing business rules according to business policies. 

Production Rule System is a computer program using productions, which include a basic representation of knowledge and rules. Productions can be executed and triggered to perform an action. 

A noncompliance that judgement and experience indicate is likely to result in the failure of the quality system or to reduce materially its ability to assure controlled processes and products Rules for achieving lATFrecognition). 

Consider the simplest type of L-system namely, a deterministic context-free L-system, also called a DOL-Systeni. As the name implies, the production rules of such systems are allowed to transform only single symbols i.e. the dynamics is independent of all neighboring symbol values. DOL-Systems are thus generalized CA systems that are allowed to add sites but whose local rule depends only on a given site itself and none of its neighbors. 

As well as purely factual data and production rules, the knowledge base may contain a section devoted to case-based information. This is a library of specific examples that in the past have proved informative and that relate to the area in which the system has expertise. 

The set of rules that comprise a CS is sometimes referred to as a production system, as they have the form of production rules. 

The decision-making engine in the CS is the set of classifier condition-action rules therefore, the key to a successful application is a well-constructed set of rules. If the control problem is straightforward, the necessary classifiers could, in principle, be created by hand, but there is rarely much point in doing this. A single classifier is equivalent to a production rule, the same structures that form the basis of most expert systems if a set of classifiers that could adequately control the environment could be created by hand, it would probably be as easy to create an equivalent expert system (ES). As an ES is able to explain its actions but a CS is not, in these circumstances, an ES would be preferable. 

The contents of a knowledge base, the facts and rules, or heuristics about a problem will be discussed shortly. The problem-solving and inference engine is the component of the system that allows rules and logic to be applied to facts in the knowledge base. For example, in rule-based expert systems, "IF-THEN" rules (production rules) in a knowledge base may be analyzed in two ways ... 

Table 7. A production rule of an expert system for Atomic Absorption Spectrometry...

The output of the CAM system is a production rule base. This is the knowledge the FMS needs to produce each pharmaceutical product. In this production rule base, among others, tools are assigned to each operation. The tool codes are selected by the FMS process planner or automatically assigned by a process planning system and are obtained from the tool database. 

The tool preparation station receives its orders, initially originated by the CAD data processing system, via the FMS network and technically specified by the CAM system in the form of a production rule base. Order data arriving at the tool preparation station include the following ... 

Finally, let us underline an important feedback loop starting at the real-time system and ending at the tool preparation station, which contains the real-time tool status, wear, and part priority information. These data are often useful to those people and/or system software systems that deal with the generation of the production rule base. It is also a very useful data set for FMS designers, since a lot of data which would previously have been lost will be saved in this way. 

Due to its complexity, a truly integrated approach is required in designing a production rule base to provide the job description for the FMS dynamic scheduler. This is because the dynamic system relies heavily on the knowledge base as represented by the rule base, and an overly restrictive rule base will lead to inefficient, at times even wrong, decisions. In other words, such a structure should represent all the multilevel interactions and their possible precedence rules that relate to the manufacturing process planning and processing decisions in an FMS. This turns out to be a difficult task. 

Individual molecular orbitals, which in symmetric systems may be expressed as symmetry-adapted combinations of atomic orbital basis functions, may be assigned to individual irreps. The many-electron wave function is an antisymmetrized product of these orbitals, and thus the assignment of the wave function to an irrep requires us to have defined mathematics for taking the product between two irreps, e.g., a 0 a" in the Q point group. These product relationships may be determined from so-called character tables found in standard textbooks on group theory. Tables B.l through B.5 list the product rules for the simple point groups G, C, C2, C2/, and C2 , respectively. 

Two homogeneous metal complex water-gas shift catalyst systems have recently appeared 98, 99). The more active of these comes from our Rochester laboratory (99, 99a). It is composed of rhodium carbonyl iodide under CO in an acetic acid solution of hydriodic acid and water. The catalyst system is active at less than 95°C and less than 1 atm CO pressure. Catalysis of the water-gas shift reaction has been unequivocally established by monitoring the CO reactant and the H2 and C02 products by gas chromatography The amount of CO consumed matches closely with the amounts of H2 and C02 product evolved throughout the reaction (99). Mass spectrometry confirms the identity of the C02 and H2 products. The reaction conditions have not yet been optimized, but efficiencies of 9 cycles/day have been recorded at 90°C under 0.5 atm of CO. Appropriate control experiments have been carried out, and have established the necessity of both strong acid and iodide. In addition, a reaction carried out with labeled 13CO yielded the same amount of label in the C02 product, ruling out any possible contribution of acetic acid decomposition to C02 production (99). 

Again we have used the Product Rule (Frame 5, Equation (5.11)) to differentiate the two product forms (PV) and (75) arising. We assume now that T and P are constant (conditions 1 and 2). This could correspond to that of a system which is open to the atmosphere (hence P 1 bar) and at constant temperature (T = 298 K). Since now dT = 0 and dP = 0 equation (6.22) applies ... 

Application of the Teller-Redlich product rule to eq. (11) shows that the limiting value is the reduced mass factor for motion along the reaction coordinate.3 The limiting value for the C -[Pg.31]

The magnitude and nature of the primary effect will be examined in terms of eq. (11) however, the present remarks are not limited to systems in which active rotations are absent. The discussion is based on calculations using the C2 model for the light molecule and the C2 model, modified to correspond to the measured frequencies for ethane- (Table VI) for the C2-di model. The complex for H rupture, is the semirigid complex 4, specified in II,B2 and Table I. The D-rupture complex (Table VI) was constructed in the same way and fits the Teller-Redlich product rule. The difference in critical energies for the two prototype reactions is Aeo = 1.38 keal. mole-1. The density of states for the molecules and the sum of states for the complexes are shown in Figures 3 and 4, respectively. 

---