Process safety implementing

CCPS released Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety in 2007. This book expanded the original 12 elements of process safety into 20 elements and included a slightly more in-depth discussion of organizational change. The additional elements were developed from experience gained over the 15 years of formal process safety implementation since their original publication in 1989. 

Will this redesign affect the process safety implementation and effectiveness of the facility process safety program or specifically any of its elements as follows not already covered in the Health, Safety, and Environmental Management System ... 

Prior to undertaking the details of process safety implementation what actions are needed ... 

Protection of Employees. In 1986, shortly after the Bhopal disaster, OSHA contracted to develop a federal standard on process ha2ards management. A proposed standard was issued in 1990, and the Process Safety Management of Highly Ha2ardous Chemicals standard was issued and implemented in 1992 (36). 

Accidental Release Provisions. The 1990 CAAA includes provisions similar to OSHA s process safety management standard for minimi2ing the accidental release of air toxics. Based on types and quantities of ha2ardous chemicals on-site, a faciUty is required to develop and implement... 

Implementation of process interlocks within process control systems is perfectly acceptable. Furthermore, it is also permissible (and probably advisable) that responsible operations personnel be authorized to bypass or ignore a process. Safety interlocks must be implemented within the separate safety interlock system. Bypassing or ignoring safety interlocks by operations personnel is simply not permitted. When this is necessary for ac tions such as verifying that the interlock continues to be func tional, such situations must be infrequent and incorporated into the design of the interlock. 

CCPS G-25. Guidelines for Implementing Process Safety Management Systems. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Center for Chemical Process Safety, New York. 

CMA 1990. A Resource Guide for Implementing the Process Safety Code of Management Practices. Chemical Manufacturers Association, Washington, DC. 

B. J. M. Ale, The Implementation of an External Safety Policy in the Netherlands, International Conference on Elazard Identification and Risk Analysis, Human factors and Human Reliability in Process Safety, January 15-17, 1992, Orlando, PL, 173-183, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, NY, 1992. 

Implementing an inherent safety review process is one mechanism companies can use to institutionalize inherent safety. The review process should integrate well with company systems for process safety management, new product development, and project execution. Safety, health, and environmental considerations in the new product or process development effort can be strengthened via the introduction of the inherent safety review. Companies may also build inherently safer design concepts into their existing process safety management system and process hazard reviews. 

Section 304 of the Clean Air Act Amendments states that employers are to consult with their employees and their representatives regarding their efforts in developing and implementing the process safety management... 

Employers shall develop a written action plan that implements employee participation in developing and conducting process hazards analyses and other elements of process safety. management. 

The employer is responsible for developing and implementing written operating procedures that provide dear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information by addressing requirements, responsibilities, and procedures for ... 

To develop a safe design, it is necessary to first design and specify all equipment and systems in accordance with applicable codes and standards. Once the system is designed, a process safety shutdown system is specified to assure that potential hazards that can be detected by measuring process upsets are detected, and that appropriate safety actions (normally an automatic shutdown) are initiated. A hazards analysis is then normally undertaken to identify and mitigate potential hazards that could lead to fire, explosion, pollution, or injury to personnel and that cannot be detected as process upsets. Finally, a system of safety management is implemented to assure the system is operated and maintained in a safe manner by personnel who have received adequate training. 

---