Problems with Solvents

Solution Casting. The production of unsupported film and sheet by solution casting has generally passed from favor and is used only for special polymers not amenable to melt processes. The use of solvents was generally very hazardous because of their flammabiUty or toxic nature. The cost of recovery and disposal of solvents became prohibitive for many lower price film appHcations. The nature of the drying operations leads to problems with solvent migration and retention that are not problems with melt-processed polymers. 

Problems with solvent flameout, hydrocarbon quenching structure-response variations for different sulfur-phosphorus-containing compounds can be partially solved by using dual-flame burner. Figure 3.14 (177-179). The lower flame... 

The problem with solvents is not so much their use, but the inefficiencies associated with their recovery and reuse. High volatility, whilst being an extremely useful property, leads to solvent losses to the environment. If a process consists of a reaction stage and a purification stage, solvents may be used and lost at each stage, as shown schematically in Figure 1.20a. Real chemical processes may include several separation steps, with further opportunities for solvent loss. 

The problem with solvents is that in most cases they decompose under the reaction conditions used in the reductive carbonylation reaction. Solvent decomposition can occur in a variety of ways including (i) acid cleavage of ether linkages by HI and HCo(CO), (ii) well known hydrolysis and halogenation reactions. 

Clearly, the most effective way to avoid problems with solvent contamination of the environment is to eliminate the use of the solvent entirely. Even though this clearly is not possible for most applications, there are some innovative solvent-free cleaning processes that deserve mention. 

Bioreactions. The use of supercritical fluids, and in particular C02, as a reaction media for enzymatic catalysis is growing. High diffusivities, low surface tensions, solubility control, low toxicity, and minimal problems with solvent residues all make SCFs attractive. In addition, other advantages for using enzymes in SCFs instead of water include reactions where water is a product, which can be driven to completion increased solubilities of hydrophobic materials increased biomolecular thermostability and the potential to integrate both the reaction and separation bioprocesses into one step (98). There have been a number of biocatalysis reactions in SCFs reported (99—101). The use of lipases shows perhaps the most commercial promise, but there are a number of issues remaining unresolved, such as solvent—enzyme interactions and the influence of the reaction environment. A potential area for increased research is the synthesis of monodisperse biopolymers in supercritical fluids (102). 

The use of solvent extraction also represents a potentially feasible process. Solvent extraction is an engineering unit operation that is adapted effectively to continuous processing. It has been used with success for the isolation of nonpolar compounds of bp >100 °C (58). Solvent extraction (continuous liquid-liquid extraction) may represent a useful process for routinely concentrating 50-100 L of water. The major problem with solvent extraction is the evaporation and recovery for reuse of large volumes of the organic solvent. Other problem areas that must be considered are purification of sufficient solvent and minimization of artifact formation by heat. 

There have been attempts to develop special methods for some elements which cause problems with solvent analysis when using the flame or furnace atomiser techniques. 

The main advantage of solvent extraction is the recycling of the pollutant or solute. Valuable solutes can be recovered for reuse in the process stream of an industry. There is a wide range of extraction equipment available today and space requirements are not a problem. There are relatively few insurmountable technical problems with solvent extraction. The most difficult problem is usually finding a solvent that best meets a long list of desired qualities including (3-6) ... 

Two methods for solvent removal are used. In most instances, the marc is contacted with steam, which vaporizes the solvent from the marc. The vaporized steam is condensed, and the solvent is reclaimed from the condensate. For water-miscible solvents, the marc can also be washed with water. The solvent can again be reclaimed from the wash in thermal equipment described below. One drawback of washing with water is that a significant amount of solids will dissolve in the water fraction. This can cause problems with solvent recovery. 

The fraction collector is a robot arm, which distributes the outlet flow into different bottles. This system is very versatile, because the number of possible fractions is large and can be increased by adding more collecting bottles. Its disadvantage is its open nature. The outlet flow is in direct contact with the atmosphere and, therefore, problems with solvent evaporation can occur. In addition, the open handling of fractions is not compatible with GMP requirements. 

The elimination of solvents in chemical processes, or the replacement of hazardous solvents with environmentally benign ones, is one of the Twelve Principles of Green Chemistry [13]. The main advantage of solventless chemistry is that it is conceptually the simplest solution for the problems with solvents. However, not many reactions can be carried out under such conditions, as exothermic reactions can be dangerous, heating and stirring can be inefficient, especially if solid reactants or products are present, and usually solvents are needed for working up the product from solventless reaction media. 

Problems with solvent flameout, hydrocarbon quenching and structure-response variations for different sulfur- and phosphorus-containing compounds with the single flame detector can be partially overcome using a dual-flame configuration. Figure 3.23... 

The main problem with solvent classification schemes based on the solvatochromic parameters is that it considers only the polar interactions of the solvents and not their cohesive energy [578,582]. The transfer of solute from one solvent to another occurs with (approximate) cancellation of dispersion interactions, but the energy required for cavity formation in the two solvents is not necessarily self-canceling, and when one of these solvents is water, cancellation of the cavity term is unlikely. Solvent classification schemes needs to consider the cohesive energy of the solvent as well as its capacity... 

When analytes are under the limit of detection (LOD) of the technique is necessary to use enrichment techniques. In headspace analysis, for this purpose the target analytes must be separated from the headspace gas either by absorption into a liquid or by adsorption onto a solid adsorbent and also by condensation in a cold trap. (Kolb, 1999). Solvent free techniques are particularly desirable in case of trace analysis to avoid problems with solvent impurities. Consequently, cryogenic trapping is the preferred choice to improved detection limits in static headspace analysis... 

Easy disassembly and repair of joints No problems with solvent or solvent vapors... 

Biocides. Waterborne systems of pH < 10- are prone to bacterial attack. The phenomenon is normally not a problem with solvent-bome systems. Bacterial infestation normally manifests itself by malodor, discoloration, and gas evolution. Nuosept 95 (Creanova Co.) is an effective biocide. 

If you are having problems with solvent focusing or early-eluting peaks appear broad or distorted in splitless injection, consider using a column with a greater film thickness. 

---