Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Problem 9.3. Solvent Selection

Using the Drago Eg and Cg values for laser SiC, chose two solvents from Table 9.5 which will give a large enthalpy of wetting. [Pg.373]

Solution The laser SiC svirface is basic and will give the hipest enthalpy of wetting if acidic solvents are used with hi values of and Cjy. The solvents with the largest Eji and values in Table 9.5 are two of the alcohols listed ethyl alcohol and benzyl alcohol. [Pg.373]

Unfortunately microcalorimetry experiments for the heat of wetting are difficult to perform due to the care that must be taken to keep the powder surface free from adsorbed impvuities. As a result an approximate method based on an infrared band shift caused by the interaction of the solvent with the solid surface has been developed. Drago often used spectroscopic shifts,, of the OH stretching frequency of phe- [Pg.373]

In these studies he used concentrations of phenol less than 0.02M to avoid association and added an excess of base to obtain the acid—base complex. Fowkes [20] has focused on the spectral shifts of the carbonyl (C=0) stretch frequency of esters and ketones adsorbed from polymers onto silica fillers. He has found that the spectral shifts of carbonyl stretch has two contributions, one due to dispersion interactions, Avc=o aiid the other due to acid—base interactions, Av q. The two shifts result in the following equations for the heat of mixing, Aff , and the surface tensions, y  [Pg.373]

For systems in which hydrogen bonding occurs, the enthalpy of solvent mixing given by Drago and the enthalpy of wetting given by Fowkes is often in error. [Pg.373]


The problem of solvent selection is most difficult for high molecular-weight polymers such as thermoplastic acryHcs and nitrocellulose in lacquers. As molecular weight decreases, the range of solvents in which resins are soluble broadens. Even though solubihty parameters are inadequate for predicting ah. solubhities, they can be useful in performing computer calculations to determine possible solvent mixtures as replacements for a solvent mixture that is known to be satisfactory for a formulation. [Pg.342]

Among various methods to synthesize nanometer-sized particles [1-3], the liquid-phase reduction method as the novel synthesis method of metallic nanoparticles is one of the easiest procedures, since nanoparticles can be directly obtained from various precursor compounds soluble in a solvent [4], It has been reported that the synthesis of Ni nanoparticles with a diameter from 5 to lOnm and an amorphous-like structure by using this method and the promotion effect of Zn addition to Ni nanoparticles on the catalytic activity for 1-octene hydrogenation [4]. However, unsupported particles were found rather unstable because of its high surface activity to cause tremendous aggregation [5]. In order to solve this problem, their selective deposition onto support particles, such as metal oxides, has been investigated, and also their catalytic activities have been studied. [Pg.391]

The second aspect of biocompatibility is a leaching problem. Ion-selective electrode materials, especially components of solvent polymeric membranes, are subject to leaching upon prolonged contact with physiological media. Membrane components such as plasticizers, ion exchangers and ionophores may activate the clotting cascade or stimulate an immune response. Moreover, they can be potentially toxic when released to the blood stream in significant concentrations. [Pg.127]

This type of solvent selection problem can be formulated and solved as a Computer Aided Molecular Design (CAMD) problem [22], Application of this method for solvent selection and design is highlighted in chapter 14 and is not discussed in detail in this chapter. The ProCAMD software [23], which is based on a hybrid CAMD method can be used to solve solvent selection problems of this type. [Pg.47]

There is no universal solvent, and solvent selection must be made individually for each separation problem. The specific choice must be based on a general knowledge of the different interactions in both phases. Among the desirable features for the extracting solvent are the following ... [Pg.419]

When a non-aqueous solvent is to be used for a given purpose, a suitable one must be selected from the infinite number available. This is not easy, however, unless there are suitable guidelines available on how to select solvents. In order to make solvent selection easier, it is useful to classify solvents according to their properties. The properties of solvents and solvent dassification have been dealt with in detail in the literature [1, 2]. In this chapter, these problems are briefly discussed in Sections 1.1 and 1.2, and then the influences of solvent properties on reactions of electrochemical importance are outlined in Section 1.3. [Pg.7]

In ionic block copolymers, micellization occurs in a solvent that is selective for one of the blocks, as for non-ionic block copolymers. However, the ionic character of the copolymer introduces a new parameter governing the structure and properties of micellar structures. In particular, the ionic strength plays an important role in the conformation of the copolymer, and the presence of a high charge density leads to some specific properties unique to ionic block copolymers. Many of the studies on ionic block copolymers have been undertaken with solvents selective for the ionic polyelectrolyte block, generally water or related solvents, such as water-methanol mixtures. However, it has been observed that it is often difficult to dissolve ionic hydrophilic-hydrophobic block copolymers in water. These dissolution problems are far more pronounced than for block copolymers in non-aqueous selective solvents, although they do not always reflect real insolubility. In many cases, dissolution can be achieved if a better solvent is used first and examples of the use of cosolvents are listed by Selb and Gallot (1985). [Pg.182]

It is not my purpose to expound chromatographic theory, or to discuss the fine points of column preparation, solvent selection, or new advances in detectors. The papers that follow deal with recent developments in these areas, and what they report is as applicable to pesticide metabolism analyses as to residue analyses. Instead, I shall describe a working radiochromatograph for the pesticide research laboratory and discuss some of the problems associated with this type of instrument. [Pg.2]

An alternative solution to the problem of selectively observing, for example, the H NMR spectrum of a metal-hydride in protio-, rather than deutero-solvent is to excite just that region of the NMR spectrum that contains signals of interest. This can be done using a shaped soft pulse, using a DANTE (delays alternating with nutation for tailored excitation) type sequence or, on a modem... [Pg.6172]

It has been suggested that the problem of selectivity can be overcome, so that the reaction can be controlled to yield only one isomer by a proper choice of acid catalyst and solvent. However, the literature is bewildering and contradictory on this point. With a view to clarifying this problem, the following study was undertaken A series of test systems was selected to span a large variation in the reaction space. [Pg.479]

The mobile phase must obviously be chosen for its chromatographic properties it must interact with a suitable stationary phase to separate a mixture as fast and as efficiently as possible. As a general rule, a range of solvents is potentially able to solve any particular problem, so selection must be based on different criteria ... [Pg.65]

An important development in HPLC has been the recent progress in systematizing column and solvent selectivity. The collection and improved accessibility of large arrays of empirical separation results are providing the major basis for faster problem solving. [Pg.81]

Sample solvent effects on gas chromatographic analyses involve a very different set of considerations. For capillary GC, the effect of the injection solvent has been shown to affect injection precision caused by the expansion volume of the vaporized injection solvent. If the solvent evaporates too fast to a volume larger than the injector volume, then the rapid pressure increase in the injector can cause the sample to leak out through the septum, leading to poor injection precision (11,12). Different solvents have different expansion volumes and expansion rates, therefore proper solvent selection can overcome this problem. Other solutions are smaller injection volume, slower injection speed, or lower injector temperature (11). [Pg.80]


See other pages where Problem 9.3. Solvent Selection is mentioned: [Pg.373]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.621]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.923]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.579]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.166]   


SEARCH



Problems, selected

Selective solvent

Solvent selection

Solvent selectivity

Solvents selecting

© 2024 chempedia.info