Privacy Concern Cases

The rule requires the employer to protect the privacy of the injured or ill employee. The employer must not enter an employee s name on the OSHA 300 Log when recording a privacy concern case. The employer must keep a separate, confidential list of the case numbers and employee names, and provide it to the government on request. If the work-related injury or illness involves an intimate body part or the reproductive system resulted from a sexual assault results in mental illness leads to HIV infection, hepatitis, or tuberculosis results from needlestick and sharps injuries contaminated with another person s blood or other potentially infectious material or other illnesses, not injuries, if the employee independently and voluntarily requests that his or her name not be entered on the OSHA 300 Log, it is considered a privacy concern case. 

---

Identify the employee involved unless it is a privacy concern case as described below. 

You must consider the following types of injuries or illnesses to be privacy concern cases ... 

You must not enter the employee s name on the OSHA 300 Log for these cases. Instead, enter privacy case in the space normally used for the employee s name. You must keep a separate, confidential list of the case numbers and employee names for the establishment s privacy concern cases so that you can update the cases and provide information to the government if asked to do so. 

If you have a reasonable basis to believe that information describing the privacy concern case may be personally identifiable even though the employee s name has been omitted, you may use discretion in describing the injury or illness on both... 

May I classify any other types of injuries and illnesses as privacy concern cases No, this is a complete list of all injuries and illnesses considered privacy concern cases for Part 1904 purposes. 

Employee, former employee, or representative When an employee, former employee, personal representative, or authorized employee representative asks for copies of your current or stored 300 Log(s) for an establishment the employee or former employee has worked in, you must give the requester a copy of the relevant page(s) by the end of the next business day.You cannot remove the names of the employees or any other information from the OSHA 300 Log before you give copies to the requester. However, to protect the privacy of injured and ill employees, do not record the employee s name on the 300 Log for certain privacy concern cases. 

If you have a reasonable basis to believe that information describing the privacy concern case may be personally identifiable even though the employee s name has been omitted, use discretion in describing the injury or illness on both the OSHA 300 and 301 forms. Enter enough information to identify the cause of the incident and the general severity of the injury or illness, but do not include details of an intimate or private nature. For example, a sexual assault case could be described as injury from assardt, or an injury to a reproductive organ could be described as lower abdominal injury. ... 

Q. Does the employer decide if an injury or illness is a privacy concern case ... 

A. Yes. The employer must decide if a case is a privacy concern case, using 1904.29(b)(7), which lists the six types of injuries and illnesses the employer must consider privacy concern cases. If the case meets any of these criteria, the employer must consider it a privacy concern case. This is a complete list of all injury and illnesses considered privacy concern cases. 

Q. Under 1904.29(b) (9), the employer may use some discretion in describing a privacy concern case on the log so the employee cannot be identified. Can the employer also leave off the job title, date, or where the event occurred ... 

If the posting area is accessible by others (e.g., members of the public) the employer must remove or hide all names of the injured or ill employees as set out in 1904. 29(b)(10). In addition, 1910.29 prohibits the employer from including the employee s name for privacy concern cases whenever the Form 300 Log is made available to coworkers, former employees, or employee representatives. 

Cookies raise a number of privacy concerns associated with customer tracking and are therefore eyed critically. Otherwise, anonymity in the WWW, aside from obvious cases such as information areas which can be entered only after password verification, is generally rather good even without special precautions. The server, CGI scripts, and other logging facilities know the IP address of the client host (which may have been further manipulated by firewall techniques or anonymizers), but not the user ID on the client host. Single-user workstations are a borderline case, naturally. 

Cl systems can be the target of malicious attacks or fail due to accidental faults, generating effects that can cause unacceptable losses. That loss can be a catastrophic consequence (physical harm, property damage, etc.—i.e., safety concerns), an impairment of civil/personal rights (e.g., privacy infringement), an economic detriment, or the triggering of social and political unrest. This broad set of cases shows how problematical it can be to assess CIs and to define effective protection instruments. 

As information security is concerned, there is a need to concurrently bear in mind information assurance, technical ICT security (systems and components), cybercrime, infowar, but also aspects of privacy, trust and confidence, and information assurance. This variety of definitions further jeopardizes the communication among analysts and both policy and business decision makers. In any case, multi-disciplinary approaches, although recognized as urgently needed, still remain a remote aspiration. 

Standards (e.g., IEC 61508), methods of risk and hazard analysis, and certification methods have evolved long before IT. Security has evolved quite recently with networked IT-systems and concerns about privacy, data integrity, authenticity and protection. Both communities have developed their own standards, methods and system views—and neither in standardization nor in application areas they cooperate well. The paper takes a holistic view of critical systems and proposes a unified approach to system dependability, integrating both safety and security, arguing that in case of massively deployed embedded systems security issues have severe safety impact and vice versa. 

Under their police powers, states have the constitutional authority to require health care providers to report new cases of diseases. Although such reporting raises an issue concerning patient privacy, the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the authority of states to require the collection of disease information. 

Within this situation, the question that will be raised is how women s privacy can be integrated into engineering education To answer this question, two cases will be explained. The first case is concerned with suggestions about how to reflect women s privacy in design and plarming components. The second case is concerned with general approach about how to implement women s specific needs in the curriculum. 

Regarding the second case, integrating women s privacy into engineering education is concerned with suggesting an approach to teach women s privacy. 

Astutely select the informational content create value, be credible, be transparent, show company values and the real people behind the company by providing names and photographs, describe the company s achievements, address security concerns up-front, provide reassurance in case of fraud, give a privacy policy and let consumers be in control of their data. 

There are open discussions about how through mHealth healthcare was modernized. Moreover, there are open questions which in the near future should be answered, such as how to determine quality of medical apps, the role of specialized organizations in regulating mobile apps, how these enabling technologies will play a crucial role in the healthcare industry, and in cases of patients with chronic diseases, how these services will remain affordable for fhem. Furthermore, the integrity, privacy, and security of the data will remain an active concern. 

---