Principal factor analysis

SEC-FUR with principal factor analysis has been used for the evaluation of 120 FUR spectra of 120 SEC fractions of thermally and radiolytically aged multicomponent systems consisting of Estane 5703, a nitroplas-ticiser (bis-2,2-dinitropropylacetal/bis-2,2-dinitropropyl-formal 1 1) and Irganox 1010 [708],... 

By convention, survival to age 1 is collapsed into the parameter for reproduction at age 1. aFactors extracted in a principal-factor analysis and rotated to a Harris—Kaiser case II orthoblique solution by the HK routine in SAS 7.0. The correlation between the resulting factors is 0.24. 

Principle components analysis (PCA), a form of factor analysis (FA), is one of the most common unsupervised methods used in the analysis of NMR data. Also known as Eigenanalysis or principal factor analysis (PEA), this method involves the transformation of data matrix D into an orthogonal basis set which describes the variance within the data set. The data matrix D can be described as the product of a scores matrix T, and a loading matrix P,... 

The first problem of an FA is that of estimation of the loading matrix, L. We will consider only two methods here, that is, PCA and principal factor analysis. 

The reduced correlation matrix is subsequently subjected to a PCA the eigenvalues are determined and normahzed to length 1, as explained in Example 5.3. The significant eigenvectors then determine the loading matrix i. This approach is termed principal factor analysis. 

Table 5.7 Factor loadings calculated by PFA (principal factor analysis) method (from Takagi et al. 1989 with permission of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan)...

Factor analysis, a family of data reduction techniques, is often performed to reduce the amount of data. Customarily, principal components analysis, principal factor analysis, or common factor analysis is performed on the data to extract factors or scores that best represent either the variation or the similarity between the data populations of the variables. For example, principal components analysis reassembles the data as linear combinations of the original variables so that the largest variance in the data corresponds to the first principal component. Each subsequent principal component is orthonormal to the previous component and represents the largest remaining variance in the data. The maximum number of principal components allowed is equal to the number of variables measured and maintains the data structure but does not reduce the dimensionality of the data. Typically, the smallest set of principal components necessary to represent some large percentage of the total variance in the data is used for further analyses. A number of tests have been developed to determine the number of principal components to retain [49,50]. 

Table Va. Principal Factor Analysis Results for Biomass Burning Direct Emissions in the Amazon Basin Savanna - Brasflia...

An alternative to principal components analysis is factor analysis. This is a technique which can identify multicollinearities in the set - these are descriptors which are correlated with a linear combination of two or more other descriptors. Factor analysis is related to (and... 

Multiple linear regression is strictly a parametric supervised learning technique. A parametric technique is one which assumes that the variables conform to some distribution (often the Gaussian distribution) the properties of the distribution are assumed in the underlying statistical method. A non-parametric technique does not rely upon the assumption of any particular distribution. A supervised learning method is one which uses information about the dependent variable to derive the model. An unsupervised learning method does not. Thus cluster analysis, principal components analysis and factor analysis are all examples of unsupervised learning techniques. 

We now consider a type of analysis in which the data (which may consist of solvent properties or of solvent effects on rates, equilibria, and spectra) again are expressed as a linear combination of products as in Eq. (8-81), but now the statistical treatment yields estimates of both a, and jc,. This method is called principal component analysis or factor analysis. A key difference between multiple linear regression analysis and principal component analysis (in the chemical setting) is that regression analysis adopts chemical models a priori, whereas in factor analysis the chemical significance of the factors emerges (if desired) as a result of the analysis. We will not explore the statistical procedure, but will cite some results. We have already encountered examples in Section 8.2 on the classification of solvents and in the present section in the form of the Swain et al. treatment leading to Eq. (8-74). 

We are about to enter what is, to many, a mysterious world—the world of factor spaces and the factor based techniques, Principal Component Analysis (PCA, sometimes known as Factor Analysis) and Partial Least-Squares (PLS) in latent variables. Our goal here is to thoroughly explore these topics using a data-centric approach to dispell the mysteries. When you complete this chapter, neither factor spaces nor the rhyme at the top of this page will be mysterious any longer. As we will see, it s all in your point of view. 

Factor spaces are a mystery no more We now understand that eigenvectors simply provide us with an optimal way to reduce the dimensionality of our spectra without degrading them. We ve seen that, in the process, our data are unchanged except for the beneficial removal of some noise. Now, we are ready to use this technique on our realistic simulated data. PCA will serve as a pre-processing step prior to ILS. The combination of Principal Component Analysis with ILS is called Principal Component Regression, or PCR. 

More detailed statistical analyses (chemical element balance, principal component analysis and factor analysis) demonstrate that soil contributes >50% to street dust, iron materials, concrete/cement and tire wear contribute 5-7% each, with smaller contributions from salt spray, de-icing salt and motor vehicle emissions (5,93-100). A list is given in Table VII of the main sources of the elements which contribute to street dust. 

Because of the relatively small number of experiments done on commercial-scale equipment before submission, and the often very narrow factor ranges (Hi/Lo might differ by only 5-10%), if conditions are not truly under control, high-level models (multi-variate regressions, principal components analysis, etc.) will pick up spurious signals due to noise and unrecognized drift. For example, Fig. 4.43 summarizes the yields achieved for... 

Because of peak overlappings in the first- and second-derivative spectra, conventional spectrophotometry cannot be applied satisfactorily for quantitative analysis, and the interpretation cannot be resolved by the zero-crossing technique. A chemometric approach improves precision and predictability, e.g., by the application of classical least sqnares (CLS), principal component regression (PCR), partial least squares (PLS), and iterative target transformation factor analysis (ITTFA), appropriate interpretations were found from the direct and first- and second-derivative absorption spectra. When five colorant combinations of sixteen mixtures of colorants from commercial food products were evaluated, the results were compared by the application of different chemometric approaches. The ITTFA analysis offered better precision than CLS, PCR, and PLS, and calibrations based on first-derivative data provided some advantages for all four methods. ... 

Univac. Large scale systems, STAT-PACK, FACTAN - Factor and principal component analysis (1973) 33-39. 

Each oil-dispersant combination shows a unique threshold or onset of dispersion [589]. A statistic analysis showed that the principal factors involved are the oil composition, dispersant formulation, sea surface turbulence, and dispersant quantity [588]. The composition of the oil is very important. The effectiveness of the dispersant formulation correlates strongly with the amount of the saturate components in the oil. The other components of the oil (i.e., asphaltenes, resins, or polar substances and aromatic fractions) show a negative correlation with the dispersant effectiveness. The viscosity of the oil is determined by the composition of the oil. Therefore viscosity and composition are responsible for the effectiveness of a dispersant. The dispersant composition is significant and interacts with the oil composition. Sea turbulence strongly affects dispersant effectiveness. The effectiveness rises with increasing turbulence to a maximal value. The effectiveness for commercial dispersants is a Gaussian distribution around a certain salinity value. 

A first introduction to principal components analysis (PCA) has been given in Chapter 17. Here, we present the method from a more general point of view, which encompasses several variants of PCA. Basically, all these variants have in common that they produce linear combinations of the original columns in a measurement table. These linear combinations represent a kind of abstract measurements or factors that are better descriptors for structure or pattern in the data than the original measurements [1]. The former are also referred to as latent variables [2], while the latter are called manifest variables. Often one finds that a few of these abstract measurements account for a large proportion of the variation in the data. In that case one can study structure and pattern in a reduced space which is possibly two- or three-dimensional. 

Using D as input we apply principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) which we discussed in the previous section. This produces the nxn factor score matrix S. The next step is to define a variable point along they th coordinate axis, by means of the coefficient kj and to compute its distance d kj) from all n row-points ... 

In the PARAF AC model, the three loading matrices A, B, C are not necessarily orthogonal [56]. The solution of the PARAF AC model, however, is unique and does not suffer from the indeterminacy that arises in principal components and factor analysis. 

G. H. Dunteman, Principal Components Analysis. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 1989. L.L. Thurstone, Multiple-factor Analysis. A Development and Expansion of the Vectors of Mind. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1947. 

In some cases a principal components analysis of a spectroscopic- chromatographic data-set detects only one significant PC. This indicates that only one chemical species is present and that the chromatographic peak is pure. However, by the presence of noise and artifacts, such as a drifting baseline or a nonlinear response, conclusions on peak purity may be wrong. Because the peak purity assessment is the first step in the detection and identification of an impurity by factor analysis, we give some attention to this subject in this chapter. 

Basically, we make a distinction between methods which are carried out in the space defined by the original variables (Section 34.4) or in the space defined by the principal components. A second distinction we can make is between full-rank methods (Section 34.2), which consider the whole matrix X, and evolutionary methods (Section 34.3) which analyse successive sub-matrices of X, taking into account the fact that the rows of X follow a certain order. A third distinction we make is between general methods of factor analysis which are applicable to any data matrix X, and specific methods which make use of specific properties of the pure factors. 

---