Factor range

Figure 2 shows the acquisition price for U.S. natural gas at the wellhead, together with the acquisition prices of cmde oil in both the international market and the U.S. domestic market (21). On a cost per unit energy basis, natural gas has been priced lower than cmde oil by factors ranging from 1.4 to 3.5 for the period shown. 

A popular overall factor refinement, known as the Hand factor approach, uses a different factor to estimate overall costs for each class of equipment to cover all labor field materials, eg, piping, insulation, electrical, foundations, stmctures, and finishes and indirect costs, but not contingencies. Hand factors range from 4 for fractionating towers down to 2.5 for miscellaneous equipment. 

Areal efficiencies for properly designed clarifiers in which detention time is not a significant factor range from 65 to 80 percent, and the surface area should be increased accordingly to reduce the overflow rate for scale-up. 

Corrosion Rate by CBD Somewhat similarly to the Tafel extrapolation method, the corrosion rate is found by intersecting the extrapolation of the linear poi tion of the second cathodic curve with the equihbrium stable corrosion potential. The intersection corrosion current is converted to a corrosion rate (mils penetration per year [mpy], 0.001 in/y) by use of a conversion factor (based upon Faraday s law, the electrochemical equivalent of the metal, its valence and gram atomic weight). For 13 alloys, this conversion factor ranges from 0.42 for nickel to 0.67 for Hastelloy B or C. For a qmck determination, 0.5 is used for most Fe, Cr, Ni, Mo, and Co alloy studies. Generally, the accuracy of the corrosion rate calculation is dependent upon the degree of linearity of the second cathodic curve when it is less than... 

RSFs. Figure 2 exhibits the aven RSFs determined from analyses of 30 different standard samples of seven different matrices. The RSFs are matrix independent, with the spread in RSF determinations being due primarily to standard alloy inhomogeneities. It is remarkable that for all but N and O the factors range over only a decade. 

Correspondingly, the effective stress intensity factor range, may be expressed as... 

Crack Initiation and the Threshold Stress intensity Factor Range... 

Kern et al83, 84 carried out hydrolyses of peptides, such as glycylvarylalanine, glycyltryptophan and bovine serum albumin, in the presence of polyethylenesulfonic acid 38 (HPES) and 37 (HPSt) in the aqueous homogeneous systems. The observed acceleration factors ranged between 3 to 50. 

Because of the relatively small number of experiments done on commercial-scale equipment before submission, and the often very narrow factor ranges (Hi/Lo might differ by only 5-10%), if conditions are not truly under control, high-level models (multi-variate regressions, principal components analysis, etc.) will pick up spurious signals due to noise and unrecognized drift. For example, Fig. 4.43 summarizes the yields achieved for... 

General Process Hazards Penalty Factor Range Penalty Factor Used(i)... 

Feature Credit Factor Range Credit Factor Used(2) Feature Credit Factor Range Credit Factor Used(2)... 

Half-life estimates of approximately 28 days for thiophanate-methyl indicate a very slow decay compared to methiocarb with an estimate of half-life of about 11 days. The application of a model based on a first-order decay process resulted in fairly high R2 and significant fit. The results suggest that both pesticides are relatively stable compared to other compounds under similar environmental conditions (Brouwer et al., 1994). With respect to the objectives of the study and the proposed model, it can be stated that the results confirm the assumption of a linear relationship between application rate (for both application techniques) and the increase of dislodgeable foliar residue. This relationship holds for modeling purposes. The contribution of the crop density or total crop surface area to the process of interception cannot be quantified with the results of the present study. Because the interception factor ranges from about 0.35 to 0.9 (Willis and McDowell, 1987), the... 

Aquatic safety factors ranged from 5.5 X 107 for rainbow trout in ponds to 9.3 X 108 for daphnia in lakes. These data emphasize that exposure levels of CGA-72662 are low and must be taken into account for a risk assessment. Although the persistence of CGA-72662 in eutrophic lakes is relatively long, the exposure is extremely low and of no environmental consequence. Overall, use of SWRRB runoff and EXAMS models show CGA-72662 to be very safe in aquatic habitats when used on vegetables in Florida muck soil. 

Slope factors for the blood lead contribution from diet in adults can be obtained from an experimental study (Cools et al. 1976) and a duplicate diet study (Sherlock et al. 1982). These slope factors range from 0.027 to 0.034 pg/dL blood per pg lead intake/day (EPA 1986a). The data from the duplicate diet infant study by Ryu et al. (1983) were reanalyzed to derive a slope factor of 0.24 pg/dL blood per pg/day lead intake (EPA 1990e). 

An additional example of cycloamylose-induced catalysis which can probably be attributed to a microsolvent effect is the oxidation of a-hy-droxyketones to a-diketones (Scheme VIII). The rate of this oxidation is accelerated by factors ranging from 2.1 to 8.3 as the structure of the substrate is varied. As noted by Cramer (1953), these accelerations may be attributed to a cycloamylose-induced shift of the keto-enol equilibrium to the more reactive enol form. 

Due to the superposition of various other biological, physiological and physical parameters used in modelling, the published exposure-dose conversion factors range from 2 to 120 mGy per WLM. However, a sensitivity analysis indicated that for most indoor exposure situations compensatory effects can reduce this range to about 5 to 10 mGy/WLM for the indoor situations occurring most frequently (OECD/NEA, 1983). 

The EC (pS cm-1) and the TDS (mg L ) both reflect the water ionic content, i.e. the dissolved load also called water salinity. The EC, easily obtained compared to chemical data, is thus widely documented in the CHEBRO database (n = 2,860 versus 999 complete major element analyses). These two parameters (EC and TDS) are linked by a linear relation TDS (mg L ) = b EC (pS cm-1), with a mean b factor 0.54 < b < 0.96 according to water types and range of salinity [21, 22], The linear relations between TDS and EC were calculated for each monitoring station, b factor ranging from 0.713 (Arga) and 0.86 (Aragon), whereas the Ebro River stations present less variability (0.774—0.798) with R2 always better than 0.72, all the relations are summarised in Table 1. These relations are very similar to that defined for the whole Ebro basin with b = 0.81 [23]. 

---