Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Predictive modelling calculations

Figure 4. Predictive model calculation of Cd(II) adsorption on amorphous iron oxyhydroxide as a function of pH and amount of solid substrate present. Cdx 5 lO M, 0.1M NaNOs. (------) Model calculations. —4.6 pKcdoH —H-1. Figure 4. Predictive model calculation of Cd(II) adsorption on amorphous iron oxyhydroxide as a function of pH and amount of solid substrate present. Cdx 5 lO M, 0.1M NaNOs. (------) Model calculations. —4.6 pKcdoH —H-1.
Umitation by Hght (luminostat y = 1, or photo-limitation y < 1, see Comet, 2010) are presented in Table 2. They are compared with the predictive model calculations presented in this chapter, where the radiative transfer equation was solved using the one-dimensional two-flux approximation for all the simple geometric stmctures of photobioreactors except for reactor PBR 2 (as indicated in Table 2), for which we used the three-dimensional finite element method developed by Comet et al. (1994). As shown in the table, the mean deviation between the experimental results and the model calculation is less than 5% (ie, within the range of the experimental standard deviation), thus confirming the ability of the proposed predictive approach to quantify photobioreactor performance under many conditions of operation. [Pg.94]

Obviously, to model these effects simultaneously becomes a very complex task. Hence, most calculation methods treat the effects which are not directly related to the molecular structure as constant. As an important consequence, prediction models are valid only for the system under investigation. A model for the prediction of the acidity constant pfQ in aqueous solutions cannot be applied to the prediction of pKj values in DMSO solutions. Nevertheless, relationships between different systems might also be quantified. Here, Kamlet s concept of solvatochro-mism, which allows the prediction of solvent-dependent properties with respect to both solute and solvent [1], comes to mind. [Pg.488]

While thin polymer films may be very smooth and homogeneous, the chain conformation may be largely distorted due to the influence of the interfaces. Since the size of the polymer molecules is comparable to the film thickness those effects may play a significant role with ultra-thin polymer films. Several recent theoretical treatments are available [136-144,127,128] based on Monte Carlo [137-141,127, 128], molecular dynamics [142], variable density [143], cooperative motion [144], and bond fluctuation [136] model calculations. The distortion of the chain conformation near the interface, the segment orientation distribution, end distribution etc. are calculated as a function of film thickness and distance from the surface. In the limit of two-dimensional systems chains segregate and specific power laws are predicted [136, 137]. In 2D-blends of polymers a particular microdomain morphology may be expected [139]. Experiments on polymers in this area are presently, however, not available on a molecular level. Indications of order on an... [Pg.385]

The electrostatic and spin-orbit parameters for Pu + which we have deduced are similar to those proposed by Conway some years ago (32). However, inclusion of the crystal-field interaction in the computation of the energy level structure, which was not done earlier, significantly modifies previous predictions. As an approximation, we have chosen to use the crystal-field parameters derived for CS2UCI6 (33), Table VII, which together with the free-ion parameters lead to the prediction of a distinct group of levels near 1100 cm-. Of course a weaker field would lead to crystal-field levels intermediate between 0 and 1000 cm-1. Similar model calculations have been indicated in Fig. 8 for Nplt+, Pu1 "1 and Amlt+ compared to the solution spectra of the ions. For Am t+ the reference is Am4" in 15 M NHhF solution (34). [Pg.194]

Polymer and coating chemists use computer models to predict the properties of formulated products from the characteristics of the raw materials and processing conditions (1, 2). Usually, the chemist supplies the identification and amounts of the materials. The software retrieves raw material property data needed for the modelling calculations from a raw material database. However, the chemist often works with groups of materials that are used as a unit. For instance, intermediates used in multiple products or premixes are themselves formulated products, not raw materials in the sense of being purchased or basic chemical species. Also, some ingredients are often used in constant ratio. In these cases, experimentation and calculation are simplified if the chemist can refer to these sets of materials as a unit, even though the unit may not be part of the raw material database. [Pg.54]

I/O data-based prediction model can be obtained in one step from collected past input and output data. However, thiCTe stiU exists a problem to be resolved. This prediction model does not require any stochastic observer to calculate the predicted output over one prediction horiajn. This feature can provide simplicity for control designer but in the pr ence of significant process or measurement noise, it can bring about too noise sensitive controller, i.e., file control input is also suppose to oscillate due to the noise of measursd output... [Pg.861]

Figure 3 shows calibration plots of log (particle diameter) vs. elution voliame difference (AV) between marker and particle using three different monodisperse latexes at a low eluant ionic strength of 1.29 mM SLS. These results illustrate the featiire of universal calibration behavior predicted by the capillary bed model as mentioned earlier. Of note also is the fact that the curve deviates from linearity for the 38 nm particle and begins to approach the origin as also indicated by the model calculations. [Pg.6]

These considerations are borne out by explicit model calculations (see Fig. 16), which give results close to those predicted by simple application of the Verwey-Niessen... [Pg.182]

Ruckenstein and Li proposed a relatively simple surface pressure-area equation of state for phospholipid monolayers at a water-oil interface [39]. The equation accounted for the clustering of the surfactant molecules, and led to second-order phase transitions. The monolayer was described as a 2D regular solution with three components singly dispersed phospholipid molecules, clusters of these molecules, and sites occupied by water and oil molecules. The effect of clusterng on the theoretical surface pressure-area isotherm was found to be crucial for the prediction of phase transitions. The model calculations fitted surprisingly well to the data of Taylor et al. [19] in the whole range of surface areas and the temperatures (Fig. 3). The number of molecules in a cluster was taken to be 150 due to an excellent agreement with an isotherm of DSPC when this... [Pg.540]

The model calculates americium burdens in lung, liver, skeleton, kidney, and body. This output could be used to predict radiation doses to these tissues. [Pg.100]

Exposure assessment using monitoring data or fate and transport models calculate the predicted environmental concentration (PEC) in each environmental compartment. More information can be obtained from Suciu et al. [4]. [Pg.98]

A fifth success concerns carbon monoxide, the dominant interstellar molecule from an observer s point of view. Despite all the uncertainties and problems with the model calculations, which will be amply brought out in this review, the predicted fractional abundance of CO is large and in the range of 10"5 to 10-4, in excellent agreement with observation. [Pg.17]

During our early experiments on chemical gels, when first observing the intermediate state with the self-similar spectrum, Eq. 1-5, we simply called it viscoelastic transition . Then, numerous solvent extraction and swelling experiments on crosslinking samples showed that the viscoelastic transition marks the transition from a completely soluble state to an insoluble state. The sol-gel transition and the viscoelastic transition were found to be indistinguishable within the detection limit of our experiments. The most simple explanation for this observation was that both phenomena coincide, and that Eqs. 1-1 and 1-5 are indeed expressions of the LST. Modeling calculations of Winter and Cham-bon [6] also showed that Eq. 1-1 predicts an infinite viscosity (see Sect. 4) and a zero equilibrium modulus. This is consistent with what one would expect for a material at the gel point. [Pg.218]

In this least squares method example the object is to calculate the terms /30, A and /J2 which produce a prediction model yielding the smallest or least squared differences or residuals between the actual analyte value Cj, and the predicted or expected concentration y To calculate the multiplier terms or regression coefficients /3j for the model we can begin with the matrix notation ... [Pg.30]

The prediction made by the model calculations should be taken with some care for two reasons 1) H2O and H2SO4 are considered to be the condensing species, whereas other species may be active in experimental or domestic environments 2) the model uses classical nucleation theory, which is the only workable theory, but which is also to be criticized because it applies macroscopic entities to clusters that contain only a few molecules (3). [Pg.332]

T. Zwickl, T. Sokalski, and E. Pretsch, Steady-state model calculations predicting the influence of key parameters on the lower detection limit and ruggedness of solvent polymeric membrane ion-selective electrodes. Electroanalysis 11, 673-680 (1999). [Pg.134]

Potentially more significant is the fact that a single ion is used to represent the dissolved form of the contaminant in question, an assumption that can lead to serious error. Cadmium in a model calculated at pH 12, for example, is present primarily as the species Cd(OH)2 almost no free ion Cd++ occurs. Employing the reaction Kd model in terms of Cd++ in this case would predict a contaminant distribution unlike that suggested by the distribution coefficient, applied in the traditional sense. We see the importance of applying a Kd model to systems similar to that for which it was originally determined. [Pg.139]


See other pages where Predictive modelling calculations is mentioned: [Pg.409]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.820]    [Pg.854]    [Pg.2911]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.359]   


SEARCH



Model calculations

Modeling Predictions

Modelling predictive

Prediction model

Predictive models

© 2024 chempedia.info