Power plants delivery

The problem of spare parts is an inherent phase of the maintenance business. The high costs of replacement parts, delivery, and in some instances, poor quality, are problems faced daily by everyone in the maintenance field. The cost of spare parts for a major power plant or refinery runs into many millions of dollars. 

About 2.5 million tons (2.3 million tonnes) of coal arc burned daily in U.S. power plants. This is equivalent to roughly 21,000 railcars in transit, so it is apparent that coorditiatiiig production and cotistimp-tioii is no easy task. Accidents, rail strikes, natural disasters (e.g., floods that take out bridges and rail lines) and severe weather (e.g., deep river freezes that halt barge traffic) can all severely disrupt deliveries for utility customers dependent on a reliable coal supply for base load plants. Nonetheless, to reduce costs U.S. utilities have significantly reduced typical inventory levels over time. Wliereas a coal inventory of ninety days of supply was once typical, inventories now frequently run in the range of thirty to forty-five days. 

Coal Slurry Pipelines. The only operating U.S. coal slurry pipeline is the 439-km Black Mesa Pipeline that has provided the 1500-MW Mohave power plant of Southern California Edison with coal from the Kayenta Mine in northern Arizona since 1970. It is a 457-mm dia system that annually delivers 4.5 x 106 t of coal, the plant s only fuel source, as a 48.5—50% slurry. Remote control of slurry and pipeline operations is achieved with a SCADA computer system. In 1992 coal delivery cost from mine to power plant was calculated to be S0.010/t-km ( 0.015/t-mi) (28). 

Numerous biomass power plants are small and utilize truck delivery of fuel. However, in a previous work (1), we noted that optimum size for straw- and wood-based biomass power plants in a western Canadian set-... 

Comparisons of Alternatives for Process Steam Delivery One of the major advantages of CHP systems is the ability to utilize the thermal energy from large, remotely located energy sources (e.g., VHTR or coal-based power plants) and deliver it in the form of process steam to several small-scale users of process steam. The overall energy efficiency for these systems is projected to be as high as 80 to 85% (1). 

It is well to note the effect of supply and demand in the prices in Table II. In Oklahoma, the demands for oil for power generation is nil because gas is used for all power plants. Residual oil from substitute natural gas plants has been valued at 57-60 /MM Btu at the plant. Based on these facts, very low sulfur residual oil can be valued at 66-69 / MM Btu currently at the ports. Delivery costs are superimposed on these. 

The standard allocation was based on data describing the situation of each installation until 2002 (2003 in case of power plants). The allowances from the new entrants reserve were to be granted for installations that increase their capacity after the start of ETS in 2005. During the data collection and consultation process a group of installations reported that after 2002 they either undertook investments leading to a permanent increase of production capacity or took actions leading to a much higher utilisation of production capacity (e.g. new contracts for centralised heat delivery). It was decided to treat such installations on an individual basis ... 

Phase II Demonstration and delivery of a high efficiency reformate tolerant 7-kWf,gt fuel cell stack and power plant utilizing molded bipolar plates and natural gas fuel processor to Argonne National Laboratory for independent testing and verification. 

Fabricate, assemble and test 7-kWf,gt power plant and prepare it for delivery. 

At each of the 15 selected PEF sites, an average cost, delivery rate and moisture content of Energy Plantation fuel for the optimum-sized plantation were determined from the results of the Energy Plantation model calculations and put into the power plant model, with which the performance of the power plant and the cost of generated electricity were calculated. The power plant load factor at each site was determined by examining published data for the utility serving that site. 

---