Potential stripping

Future design of metal ligands for AD treatment is Ukely to be centered on molecules that specifically bind to metal-binding sites on Ap and/or APP rather than broad spectrum metal chelators that can potentially strip metals... 

Stripping voltammetry involves the pre-concentration of the analyte species at the electrode surface prior to the voltannnetric scan. The pre-concentration step is carried out under fixed potential control for a predetennined time, where the species of interest is accumulated at the surface of the working electrode at a rate dependent on the applied potential. The detemiination step leads to a current peak, the height and area of which is proportional to the concentration of the accumulated species and hence to the concentration in the bulk solution. The stripping step can involve a variety of potential wavefomis, from linear-potential scan to differential pulse or square-wave scan. Different types of stripping voltaimnetries exist, all of which coimnonly use mercury electrodes (dropping mercury electrodes (DMEs) or mercury film electrodes) [7, 17]. 

Anodic-stripping voltaimnetry (ASV) is used for the analysis of cations in solution, particularly to detemiine trace heavy metals. It involves pre-concentrating the metals at the electrode surface by reducmg the dissolved metal species in the sample to the zero oxidation state, where they tend to fomi amalgams with Hg. Subsequently, the potential is swept anodically resulting in the dissolution of tire metal species back into solution at their respective fomial potential values. The detemiination step often utilizes a square-wave scan (SWASV), since it increases the rapidity of tlie analysis, avoiding interference from oxygen in solution, and improves the sensitivity. This teclmique has been shown to enable the simultaneous detemiination of four to six trace metals at concentrations down to fractional parts per billion and has found widespread use in seawater analysis. 

A form of voltammetry in which the analyte is first deposited on the electrode and then removed, or stripped, electrochemically while monitoring the current as a function of the applied potential. 

Anodic stripping voltammetry consists of two steps (Figure 11.37). The first is a controlled potential electrolysis in which the working electrode, usually a hanging mercury drop or mercury film, is held at a cathodic potential sufficient to deposit the metal ion on the electrode. For example, with Cu + the deposition reaction is... 

Potential-excitation signal and voltammogram for anodic stripping voltammetry at a hanging mercury drop electrode. 

In the second step, the potential is scanned anodically toward more positive potentials. When the potential of the working electrode is sufficiently positive the analyte is stripped from the electrode, returning to solution as its oxidized form... 

The current during the stripping step is monitored as a function of potential, giving rise to peak-shaped voltammograms similar to that shown in Figure 11.37. The peak current is proportional to the analyte s concentration in the solution. 

Second, stripping is accomplished by scanning cathodically toward a more negative potential, reducing Hg2 back to Hg and returning the analyte to solution. 

In adsorptive stripping voltammetry the deposition step occurs without electrolysis. Instead, the analyte adsorbs to the electrode s surface. During deposition the electrode is maintained at a potential that enhances adsorption. For example, adsorption of a neutral molecule on a Hg drop is enhanced if the electrode is held at -0.4 V versus the SCE, a potential at which the surface charge of mercury is approximately zero. When deposition is complete the potential is scanned in an anodic or cathodic direction depending on whether we wish to oxidize or reduce the analyte. Examples of compounds that have been analyzed by absorptive stripping voltammetry also are listed in Table 11.11. 

Sensitivity In many voltammetric experiments, sensitivity can be improved by adjusting the experimental conditions. For example, in stripping voltammetry, sensitivity is improved by increasing the deposition time, by increasing the rate of the linear potential scan, or by using a differential-pulse technique. One reason for the popularity of potential pulse techniques is an increase in current relative to that obtained with a linear potential scan. 

Time, Cost, and Equipment Commercial instrumentation for voltammetry ranges from less than 1000 for simple instruments to as much as 20,000 for more sophisticated instruments. In general, less expensive instrumentation is limited to linear potential scans, and the more expensive instruments allow for more complex potential-excitation signals using potential pulses. Except for stripping voltammetry, which uses long deposition times, voltammetric analyses are relatively rapid. 

In stripping voltammetry the analyte is first deposited on the electrode, usually as the result of an oxidation or reduction reaction. The potential is then scanned, either linearly or by using potential pulses, in a direction that removes the analyte by a reduction or oxidation reaction. 

In field ionization (or field desorption), application of a large electric potential to a surface of high curvature allows a very intense electric field to be generated. Such positive or negative fields lead to electrons being stripped from or added to molecules lying on the surface. The positive or negative molecular ions so produced are mass measured by the mass spectrometer. 

In order to maintain a definite contact area, soHd supports for the solvent membrane can be introduced (85). Those typically consist of hydrophobic polymeric films having pore sizes between 0.02 and 1 p.m. Figure 9c illustrates a hoUow fiber membrane where the feed solution flows around the fiber, the solvent—extractant phase is supported on the fiber wall, and the strip solution flows within the fiber. Supported membranes can also be used in conventional extraction where the supported phase is continuously fed and removed. This technique is known as dispersion-free solvent extraction (86,87). The level of research interest in membrane extraction is reflected by the fact that the 1990 International Solvent Extraction Conference (20) featured over 50 papers on this area, mainly as appHed to metals extraction. Pilot-scale studies of treatment of metal waste streams by Hquid membrane extraction have been reported (88). The developments in membrane technology have been reviewed (89). Despite the research interest and potential, membranes have yet to be appHed at an industrial production scale (90). 

Some of the gas atoms or molecules must be stripped of one or more of their electrons. The energy required to accomplish this, called the ionisation potential, is measured in electron volts. In MHD flows of interest, the required energy is suppHed by heating the gas. Thus the ionisation process is referred to as thermal ionisation. 

Ammonium Ion Removal. A fixed-bed molecular-sieve ion-exchange process has been commercialized for the removal of ammonium ions from secondary wastewater treatment effluents. This application takes advantage of the superior selectivity of molecular-sieve ion exchangers for ammonium ions. The first plants employed clinoptilolite as a potentially low cost material because of its availability in natural deposits. The bed is regenerated with a lime-salt solution that can be reused after the ammonia is removed by pH adjustment and air stripping. The ammonia is subsequentiy removed from the air stream by acid scmbbing. 

For solvent extraction of a tetravalent vanadium oxyvanadium cation, the leach solution is acidified to ca pH 1.6—2.0 by addition of sulfuric acid, and the redox potential is adjusted to —250 mV by heating and reaction with iron powder. Vanadium is extracted from the blue solution in ca six countercurrent mixer—settler stages by a kerosene solution of 5—6 wt % di-2-ethyIhexyl phosphoric acid (EHPA) and 3 wt % tributyl phosphate (TBP). The organic solvent is stripped by a 15 wt % sulfuric acid solution. The rich strip Hquor containing ca 50—65 g V20 /L is oxidized batchwise initially at pH 0.3 by addition of sodium chlorate then it is heated to 70°C and agitated during the addition of NH to raise the pH to 0.6. Vanadium pentoxide of 98—99% grade precipitates, is removed by filtration, and then is fused and flaked. 

For vanadium solvent extraction, Hon powder can be added to reduce pentavalent vanadium to quadrivalent and trivalent Hon to divalent at a redox potential of —150 mV. The pH is adjusted to 2 by addition of NH, and an oxyvanadium cation is extracted in four countercurrent stages of mixer—settlers by a diesel oil solution of EHPA. Vanadium is stripped from the organic solvent with a 15 wt % sulfuric acid solution in four countercurrent stages. Addition of NH, steam, and sodium chlorate to the strip Hquor results in the precipitation of vanadium oxides, which are filtered, dried, fused, and flaked (22). Vanadium can also be extracted from oxidized uranium raffinate by solvent extraction with a tertiary amine, and ammonium metavanadate is produced from the soda-ash strip Hquor. Fused and flaked pentoxide is made from the ammonium metavanadate (23). 

The carbon monoxide purity from the Cosorb process is very high because physically absorbed gases are removed from the solution prior to the low pressure stripping column. Furthermore, there is no potential for oxidation of absorbed carbon monoxide as ia the copper—Hquor process. These two factors lead to the production of very high purity carbon monoxide, 99+ %. Feed impurities exit with the hydrogen-rich tail gas therefore, the purity of this coproduct hydrogen stream depends on the impurity level ia the feed gas. 

---