Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Pore size solution

UF membrane separation depends upon membrane pore size, solute-membrane interactions, shape and size of the macromolecule and CP. For maximum separation efficiency there should be a 10-fold difference in the sizes of the species to be separated. In addition, since all fiquid separation membranes have a certain, pore size distribution (e.g., there is a bi-modal distribution in the case of RO membranes predominantly small pores, < 10 A, and occasional large pores, > 100 A, that are attributable to the inevitable existence of defects in the skin layer) MWCO of UF membranes should be at least one-half that of the smallest solute to be removed. Characteristics of UF membranes based on pore size are fisted in Table 6.12. [Pg.36]

Size-exclusion chromatography separates solutes on the basis of their size. The stationary phase consists of a polymer matrix of various pore sizes. Solutes are separated according to their ability to penetrate the polymer matrix. The small solutes penetrate more and lag behind the larger solutes. [Pg.161]

At the present time there exist no flux relations wich a completely sound cheoretical basis, capable of describing transport in porous media over the whole range of pressures or pore sizes. All involve empiricism to a greater or less degree, or are based on a physically unrealistic representation of the structure of the porous medium. Existing models fall into two main classes in the first the medium is modeled as a network of interconnected capillaries, while in the second it is represented by an assembly of stationary obstacles dispersed in the gas on a molecular scale. The first type of model is closely related to the physical structure of the medium, but its development is hampered by the lack of a solution to the problem of transport in a capillary whose diameter is comparable to mean free path lengths in the gas mixture. The second type of model is more tenuously related to the real medium but more tractable theoretically. [Pg.3]

In writing the present book our aim has been to give a critical exposition of the use of adsorption data for the evaluation of the surface area and the pore size distribution of finely divided and porous solids. The major part of the book is devoted to the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method for the determination of specific surface, and the use of the Kelvin equation for the calculation of pore size distribution but due attention has also been given to other well known methods for the estimation of surface area from adsorption measurements, viz. those based on adsorption from solution, on heat of immersion, on chemisorption, and on the application of the Gibbs adsorption equation to gaseous adsorption. [Pg.292]

It would be difficult to over-estimate the extent to which the BET method has contributed to the development of those branches of physical chemistry such as heterogeneous catalysis, adsorption or particle size estimation, which involve finely divided or porous solids in all of these fields the BET surface area is a household phrase. But it is perhaps the very breadth of its scope which has led to a somewhat uncritical application of the method as a kind of infallible yardstick, and to a lack of appreciation of the nature of its basic assumptions or of the circumstances under which it may, or may not, be expected to yield a reliable result. This is particularly true of those solids which contain very fine pores and give rise to Langmuir-type isotherms, for the BET procedure may then give quite erroneous values for the surface area. If the pores are rather larger—tens to hundreds of Angstroms in width—the pore size distribution may be calculated from the adsorption isotherm of a vapour with the aid of the Kelvin equation, and within recent years a number of detailed procedures for carrying out the calculation have been put forward but all too often the limitations on the validity of the results, and the difficulty of interpretation in terms of the actual solid, tend to be insufficiently stressed or even entirely overlooked. And in the time-honoured method for the estimation of surface area from measurements of adsorption from solution, the complications introduced by... [Pg.292]

Two classes of micron-sized stationary phases have been encountered in this section silica particles and cross-linked polymer resin beads. Both materials are porous, with pore sizes ranging from approximately 50 to 4000 A for silica particles and from 50 to 1,000,000 A for divinylbenzene cross-linked polystyrene resins. In size-exclusion chromatography, also called molecular-exclusion or gel-permeation chromatography, separation is based on the solute s ability to enter into the pores of the column packing. Smaller solutes spend proportionally more time within the pores and, consequently, take longer to elute from the column. [Pg.593]

In order to maintain a definite contact area, soHd supports for the solvent membrane can be introduced (85). Those typically consist of hydrophobic polymeric films having pore sizes between 0.02 and 1 p.m. Figure 9c illustrates a hoUow fiber membrane where the feed solution flows around the fiber, the solvent—extractant phase is supported on the fiber wall, and the strip solution flows within the fiber. Supported membranes can also be used in conventional extraction where the supported phase is continuously fed and removed. This technique is known as dispersion-free solvent extraction (86,87). The level of research interest in membrane extraction is reflected by the fact that the 1990 International Solvent Extraction Conference (20) featured over 50 papers on this area, mainly as appHed to metals extraction. Pilot-scale studies of treatment of metal waste streams by Hquid membrane extraction have been reported (88). The developments in membrane technology have been reviewed (89). Despite the research interest and potential, membranes have yet to be appHed at an industrial production scale (90). [Pg.70]

The temperature of the anodizing solution also has an effect on the anodic film stmcture. Thus chillers are used to maintain a consistent temperature in the bath while the part is being anodized, and air agitation is continuously appHed to ensure a uniform temperature. The result is a consistent anodic film density of uniform pore size. [Pg.224]

Soaking a siUca gel in dilute ammonium hydroxide solution at 50—85°C can result in significant coarsening of the gel texture (5). Aging and thermal treatments result in a one-way process, ie, loss of specific surface area and in increase in pore size. The pore size can also be enlarged by dissolution of some of the siUca. Treating a siUca gel with O.S-N KOH or dilute HF can enlarge the pores from 0.7 to 3.7 nm (3). [Pg.253]

If the solute size is approximately the (apparent) membrane-pore size, it interferes with the pore dimensions. The solute concentration in the permeate first increases, then decreases with time. The point of maximum interference is further characterized as a minimum flux. Figure 4 is a plot of retention and flux versus molecular weight. It shows the minimum flux at ca 60—90% retention. [Pg.296]

This deposit is composed of suspended particles similar to conventional filter cakes, and more importantly, a slime that forms as retained solutes exceed their solubility. The gel concentration 6 is a function of the feed composition and the membrane-pore size. The gel usually has a much lower hydrauHc permeabihty and smaller apparent pore size than the underlying membrane (27). The gel layer and the concentration gradient between the gel layer and the bulk concentration are called the gel-polarization layer. [Pg.296]

Porosity and Pore Size. The support porosity is the volume of the support occupied by void space and usually is described in units of cm /g. This value represents the maximum amount of Hquid that may be absorbed into the pore stmcture, which is an especially important consideration for deposition of metal salts or other active materials on the support surface by Hquid impregnation techniques. The concentration of active material to be used in the impregnating solution is deterrnined by the support porosity and the desired level of active material loading on the catalyst. If the porosity is too low, inefficient use of the support material and reactor volume may result. If the porosity is too high, the support body may not contain sufficient soHd material to provide the strength necessary to survive catalyst manufacture and handling. [Pg.194]

Second, most membrane materials adsorb proteins. Worse, the adsorption is membrane-material specific and is dependent on concentration, pH, ionic strength, temperature, and so on. Adsorption has two consequences it changes the membrane pore size because solutes are adsorbed near and in membrane pores and it removes protein from the permeate by adsorption in addition to that removed by sieving. Porter (op. cit., p. 160) gives an illustrative table for adsorption of Cytochrome C on materials used for UF membranes, with values ranging from 1 to 25 percent. Because of the adsorption effects, membranes are characterized only when clean. Fouling has a dramatic effect on membrane retention, as is explained in its own section below. [Pg.2039]

Chemical Phase Inversion Svmrnetrical phase-inversion membranes (Fig, 22-71) remain the most important commercial MF membranes produced. The process produces tortiioiis-Bow membranes. It involves preparing a concentrated solution of a polvrner in a solvent. The solution is spread into a thin film, then precipitated through the slow addition of a nonsolvent, iisiiallv w ater, sometimes from the vapor phase. The technique is irnpressivelv v ersatile, capable of producing fairlv uniform membranes wFose pore size rnav be varied within broad limits. [Pg.2044]

Freeing a solution from extremely small particles [e.g. for optical rotatory dispersion (ORD) or circular dichroism (CD) measurements] requires filters with very small pore size. Commercially available (Millipore, Gelman, Nucleopore) filters other than cellulose or glass include nylon, Teflon, and polyvinyl chloride, and the pore diameter may be as small as 0.01 micron (see Table 6). Special containers are used to hold the filters, through which the solution is pressed by applying pressure, e.g. from a syringe. Some of these filters can be used to clear strong sulfuric acid solutions. [Pg.15]

Ultrafiltration utilizes membrane filters with small pore sizes ranging from O.OlS t to in order to collect small particles, to separate small particle sizes, or to obtain particle-free solutions for a variety of applications. Membrane filters are characterized by a smallness and uniformity of pore size difficult to achieve with cellulosic filters. They are further characterized by thinness, strength, flexibility, low absorption and adsorption, and a flat surface texture. These properties are useful for a variety of analytical procedures. In the analytical laboratory, ultrafiltration is especially useful for gravimetric analysis, optical microscopy, and X-ray fluorescence studies. [Pg.347]


See other pages where Pore size solution is mentioned: [Pg.19]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.1875]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.647]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.2038]    [Pg.2141]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.978]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.778]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.295 ]




SEARCH



Pore size

© 2024 chempedia.info