Modal distribution

Assume f=li, = f=l for simplicity, and then the following characteristic of the modal current is observed  

The modal distribution can be also explained by applying the transformation matrix A rather than its inverse A in the preceding text  

For example, the mode 0 current is explained to have a distribution of the same amount of the actual current on each phase from the earlier equation. 

The same explanation as the aforementioned can be made by applying the transformation matrices given in Equations 1.176 through 1.178 in the case of a completely transposed line. When a line is untransposed, those transformation matrices are no more useful except that of Equation 1.179, which can be used as an approximation of a transformation matrix of an untransposed horizontal line. In the untransposed line case, the transformation matrix is frequency dependent as explained in Section 1.5.1, and thus the modal voltage and current distributions vary as frequency changes. Also, the current distribution differs from the voltage distribution. 

Explain why the modal propagation constants and the modal characteristic impedances for modes 1 and 2 (aerial modes) on a transposed three-phase line become identical. 

---

A conspicuous finding in these studies is that Et2AlCl-based initiator systems lead to bimodal distributions whereas those with EtjAlBr and Et2All lead to mono-modal distributions. Also, the MWD for Et2AlCl was broader ( 1.4 to 5.9) than those for Et2AlBr ( 1.7 to 2.2) and Et2AlI ( 1.9 to 3.0). A possible explanation for the bimodal MWD is given in Section 5. The reason(s) for the relatively narrow MWD s (<2) of LMWF and HMWF remains obscure. 

Experimental considerations Frequently a numerical inverse Laplace transformation according to a regularization algorithm (CONTEST) suggested by Provencher [48,49] is employed to obtain G(T). In practice the determination of the distribution function G(T) is non-trivial, especially in the case of bimodal and M-modal distributions, and needs careful consideration [50]. Figure 10 shows an autocorrelation function for an aqueous polyelectrolyte solution of a low concentration (c = 0.005 g/L) at a scattering vector of q — 8.31 x 106 m-1 [44]. 

The plot of the diameter vs the relative number of pores also provides useful information on the size distribution. A broadening of the size distribution will then give a reduction of the peak height. In contrast to the hexane system, no bi-modal distribution is detected up to the solubility limit of cyclohexane at 25 wt %. 

Hizukuri, S. (1986). Poly modal distribution of the chain lengths of amylopectins, and its significance. Carbohydr. Res., 147, 342-347. 

Over the years, numerous studies of CAIs have been carried out by a variety of techniques. MacPherson et al. (1995) compiled all available data and found that the 26A1/27A1 ratios for CAIs have a bi-modal distribution (Fig. 8.27). Many have ratios near 5 x 10-5, which they interpreted as the initial ratio for the solar system (the canonical ratio). Many others have initial ratios near zero. Resetting or isotopic disturbance by secondary processes is responsible for the low ratios in most cases. But a few CAIs formed with little or no 26Al. These so-called FUN CAIs (Fig. 8.27) also exhibit large isotopic mass fractionations and isotopic anomalies reflecting different mixtures of nucleosynthetic components. In 1995, evidence for 26A1 in objects other than CAIs was rare. 

Equilibria between various types of fully developed ionic species are unlikely to be sufficiently slow to allow a bi-modal distribution to develop. 

A procedure to estimate and remove any bias due to assuming a unimodal functional form has been incorporated into the LUT. The bias is determined by testing the LUT performance with extinction spectra calculated from measured bi- and tri-modal size distributions obtained from wire-impactor and dustsonde measurements which coincide in space and time with the SAGE D/CLAES composites. The bi- and tri-modal distributions were reported by Pueschel et al. [9], Goodman et al. [10] and Deshler et al. [11,12], The calculated bias is then subtracted from the retrieved Reff values to obtain bias-corrected values of RtJf. Similar procedures are used to estimate and remove bias in retrieved S and V. Figure 5 compares a measured post-Pinatubo bimodal... 

The average branch chain length of amylopectin has a bimodal distribution that differs from the single modal distribution of that of glycogen.257 The average branch chain... 

Alternative solutions to equation (8.9) are available if the shape of the distribution curve is assumed. Svarovsky and Friedova [4] assumed a fit by the 3-parameter equation of Harris [5] the parameters being found by means of a curve-fitting technique applied to the measured concentrations. This method is applicable to variable height, variable time and variable height and time. The main disadvantage of this method is that it is unsuitable for multi-modal distributions. 

In an examination of glass beads sieved into five fractions in the size range 70 to 400 mm it was found that the accuracy of the determined medians was good. The distribution widths and the resolution of binary mixtures were compared with image analysis. These showed some discrepancies for both mono-and bi-modal distributions with undersizing in both cases [166]. 

Commercially available instruments usually employ both approaches. For highly skewed distributions or distributions having more than one mode, an inversion algorithm must be used [280] whereas for narrowly classified mono-modal distributions the cumulants approach is satisfactory. 

Chemical analyses of Hb-F of AS, SS, and SC patients show a widespread ratio of the two types of chains (Fig. 19). It may be that a bi-modal distribution is present, but the scatter in the data makes it unclear whether these patients fall in groups with glycine values of normal adults and newborns. Some indication of familial occurrence of these specific ratios may be evident. 

The relationship between the CYP2D6 enzyme metabolic rate (phenotype) and the CYP2D6 genotype has been extensively characterized. Genetic variability accounts for the tetra-modal distribution of CYP2D6 activity described historically by the phenotypes. The rank order of... 

Granulometric analysis of fractions 1, 2, 3 (Fig. 6) clearly shows that particles are mainly supracolloids, between 1 to 100 xm, with a mode value close to 30 xm. The fraction 4 (at the bottom of the Imhoff cone) presents the widest range size with particle larger than 100 im, and a multi-modal distribution. After 1 h of settling, the separation of settleable matter is achieved, as fractions 1 to 3 do not contain particles of size above 100 xm, even if, in the first fraction, some millimetric floating particles are present. One can note that no colloidal population is detected by laser granulometry. 

Thus carbon metabolism on reefs has a tri-modal distribution (Table 2.2), and estimates of carbon production and calcification can be made by basic knowledge of bottom type. The partitioning of net carbon production and consumption, and the relationships to nutrient cycles, however, are not well understood, nor characterized, especially under field conditions. Further advances in this area of research will delineate kinetic constraints on the biogeochemical rates and their links with the carbon cycle. 

This enzyme hydrolyzes the sulfate group from adenosine 5 -phosphosul-fate (APS) and is widely distributed in the animal kingdom (Bailey-Wood et al., 1969). Among various mammalian tissues, brain is the richest source. Intracellular distribution studies of APS sulfohydrolase have indicated a bi-modal distribution of this enzyme between lysosomal and cytosolic fractions of bovine liver and pig kidney (Bailey-Wood et al., 1970 Armstrong et al., 1970). Cytosolic APS sulfohydrolase has been purified to homogeneity from bovine liver (Stokes et al., 1973a). The purified enzyme has a molecular weight of 69,000 (Table 5). It has optimal activity at pH 5.4 (Table 6). 

Method of cumulants is suitable for characterizing a reasonably narrow uni modal distribution. When G(T, 0) is broad or can not be adequately represented by unimodal distribution, the method of cumulants fails. Indeed, two very different distributions may have the same first two moments, and thus can not be distinguished from each other based on the method of cumulants [46],... 

---