Polymer preparation techniques

If the polymer is insoluble, it precipitates out without any noticeable increase in solution viscosity. Examples of this type of reaction can be polymerizations of acrylonitrile or vinylidine chloride. The activation energy is still similar to polymerizations of soluble polymers and the initial rates are proportional to the square root of initiator concentration. Also, the molecular weights of the polymerization products are inversely proportional to the polymerization temperatures and to initiator concentrations. Furthermore, the molecular weights of the resultant polymers far exceed the solubility limits of the polymers in the monomers. The limits of acrylonitrile solubility in the monomer are at a molecular weight of 10,000. Yet, polymers with molecular weights as high as 1,000,000 are obtained by this process. This means that the polymerizations must proceed in the precipitated polymer particles, swollen and surrounded by monomer molecules. 

The kinetic picture of free-radical polymerization applies best to bulk polymerizations at low points of conversion. As the conversion progresses, however, the reaction becomes complicated by chain transferring to the polymer and by gel effect. The amount of chain transferring varies, of course, with the reactivity of the polymer radical. 

Bulk polymerization is employed when some special properties are required, such as high molecular weight or maximum clarity, or convenience in handling. Industrially, bulk polymerization in special equipment can have economic advantages, as with bulk polymerization of styrene. This is discussed in Chapter 5. 

Solution polymerization differs from bulk polymerization, because a solvent is present in the reaction mixture. The monomer may be fully or only partially soluble in the solvent. The polymer may be (1) completely soluble in the solvent, (2) only partially soluble in the solvent, and (3) insoluble in the solvent. 

When the monomer and the polymer are both soluble in the solvent, initiation and propagation occur in a homogeneous environment of the solvent. The rate of the polymerization is lower than in bulk. In addition, the higher the dilution of the reactants, the lower the rate and the lower the molecular weight of the product. This is due to chain transferring to the solvent. In addition, any solvent that can react to form telomers will also combine with the growing chains. 

Four general techniques are used for preparation of polymers by free-radical mechanism polymerization in bulk, in solution, in suspension and in emulsion. The bulk or mass polymerization is probably the simplest of the four methods. Only the monomer and the initiator are present in the reaction mixmre. It makes the reaction simple to carry out, though the exotherm of the reaction might 

---

In the analysis of polymer surfaces and interfaces there has been tremendous progress in recent years. This is to a large extent due to the development of surface- and interface-sensitive analytical techniques which previously had not been applied to polymers. It is thus possible to achieve molecular resolution both for the free polymer surface and for buried interfaces between polymers. In addition, suitable sample preparation techniques are available and extremely homogeneous and smooth polymer thin films can be prepared. They may be put together to investigate the interface between polymers. 

For these reasons, despite the apparent advantages and also despite the fact that bulk polymerisation is so often the method of choice for the laboratory preparation of vinyl polymers, this technique is not widely used in industry. Only three polymers are produced in this way, namely poly(ethylene), poly(styrene), and poly(methyl methacrylate). 

Rao, J. P. Geckeler, K. E. (2011). Polymer nanoparticles Preparation techniques and size-control parameters. Fh ogress in Polymer Science, Vol. 36, 7, (July 2011), pp. (887-913), ISSN 0079-6700... 

Techniques were developed for the dilute solution characterization of polydlchlorophosphazene. The purity of the trimer has a significant effect on oligomer formation, polymerization time and polymer MW and MWD. The polymers prepared in this study have high molecular weights and broad molecular weight distributions and probably have similar, if not identical, chain structures. 

Structure The polymers are produced as powders or as films on the electrodes. Most conductive polymers have a fibrous structure, each fiber consisting of hundreds of strands of polymer molecules. Techniques exist to control fiber preparation so as to obtain nanofibers expected to be particularly useful as catalyst substrates and in electronic applications (MacDiannid, 2000). 

SFE of fruits and vegetables and meat products has been reported, but the sample preparation techniques necessary to obtain reproducible results are extremely time consuming. Solid absorbents such as Hydromatrix, Extrelut " anhydrous magnesium sulfate or absorbent polymers are required to control the level of water in the sample for the extraction of the nonpolar pesticides. Without the addition of Hydromatrix, nonpolar pesticides cannot penetrate the water barrier between the sample particles and the supercritical CO2. The sample is normally frozen and the addition of dry-ice may be required to reduce losses due to degradation and/or evaporation. Thorough reviews of the advantages and limitations of SFE in pesticide residues... 

Table 1.13, which lists the main techniques used for polymer/additive analysis, allows some interesting observations. Classical extraction methods still score very high amongst sample preparation techniques on the other hand, not unexpectedly, inorganic analysis methods are not in frequent use for separation purposes... 

Analytical techniques for the quantitative determination of additives in polymers generally fall into two classes indirect (or destructive) and direct (or nondestructive). Destructive methods require an irreversible alteration to the sample so that the additive can be removed from the plastic material for subsequent detention. This chapter separates the additive wheat from the polymer chaff , and deals with sample preparation techniques for indirect analysis. 

In general, new sample preparation technologies are faster, more efficient and cost effective than traditional sample preparation techniques. They are also safer, more easily automated, use smaller amounts of sample and less organic solvent, provide better target analyte recovery with enhanced precision and accuracy. Attention to the sample preparation steps has also become an important consideration in reducing contamination. A useful general guide to sample preparation has been published [3]. A recent review on sample preparation methods for polymer/additive analysis is also available [4]. 

Isolation of the products from complex matrixes (e.g. polymer and water, air, or soil) is often a demanding task. In the process of stability testing (10 days at 40 °C, 1 h at reflux temperature) of selected plastic additives (DEHA, DEHP and Irganox 1076) in EU aqueous simulants, the additive samples after exposure were simply extracted from the aqueous simulants with hexane [63]. A sonication step was necessary to ensure maximum extraction of control samples. Albertsson et al. developed several sample preparation techniques using headspace-GC-MS [64], LLE [65] and SPE [66-68]. A practical guide to LLE is available [3]. 

Table 3.4 summarises the main characteristics of a variety of sample preparation modes for in-polymer additive analysis. Table 3.5 is a short literature evaluation of various extraction techniques. Majors [91] has recently reviewed the changing role of extraction in preparation of solid samples. Vandenburg and Clifford [4] and others [6,91-95] have reviewed several sample preparation techniques, including polymer dissolution, LSE and SEE, microwave dissolution, ultra-sonication and accelerated solvent extraction. 

The main characteristics of the ideal extraction method are given in Table 3.47, which at the same time are also criteria for comparison of sample preparation techniques. It is unlikely that a unique best method can be defined, which is analyte and matrix independent. Extraction is affected by polymer functionality, molecular weight and cross-linking. Selective extraction of some additives is basically not possible. Hence, the goal of an ideal extraction would be the complete extraction of all additives from the polymer for subsequent chromatographic separation. 

Polymer extracts are frequently examined using GC-MS. Pierre and van Bree [257] have identified nonylphenol from the antioxidant TNPP, a hindered bisphenol antioxidant, the plasticiser DOP, and two peroxide catalyst residues (cumol and 2-phenyl-2-propanol) from an ABS terpolymer extract. Tetramethylsuccino-dinitrile (TMSDN) has been determined quantitatively using specific-ion GC-MS in extracts of polymers prepared using azobisisobutyronitrile TMSDN is highly volatile. Peroxides (e.g. benzoyl or lauroylperoxide) produce acids as residues which may be detected by MS by methylation of the evaporated extract prior to GC-MS examination [258]. GC-MS techniques are... 

---