Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Polymer brushes radical polymerization

The preparation of polymer brushes by controlled radical polymerization from appropriately functionalized polymer chains, surfaces or particles by a grafting from approach has recently attracted a lot of attention.742 743 The advantages of growing a polymer brush directly on a surface include well-defined grafts, when the polymerization kinetics exhibit living character, and stability due to covalent attachment of the polymer chains to the surface. Most work has used ATRP or NMP, though papers on the use of RAFT polymerization in this context also have begun to appear. [Pg.560]

Pyun, J., Kowalewski, T. and Matyjaszewski, K. (2003) Synthesis of polymer brushes using atom transfer radical polymerization. Macromol. Rapid Commun., 24, 1043-1059. [Pg.69]

Tsujii, Y, Ohno, K., Yamamoto, S., Goto, A. and Fukuda, T. (2006) Structure and properties of high-density polymer brushes prepared by surface-initiated living radical polymerization. Adv. Polym. Sci., 197, 1-45. [Pg.69]

Qin, S., et al., Polymer brushes on single-walled carbon nanotubes by atom transfer radical polymerization ofn-butyl methacrylate. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2003. 126(1) p. 170-176. [Pg.162]

While in most of the reports on SIP free radical polymerization is utihzed, the restricted synthetic possibihties and lack of control of the polymerization in terms of the achievable variation of the polymer brush architecture limited its use. The alternatives for the preparation of weU-defined brush systems were hving ionic polymerizations. Recently, controlled radical polymerization techniques has been developed and almost immediately apphed in SIP to prepare stracturally weU-de-fined brush systems. This includes living radical polymerization using nitroxide species such as 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidin-l-oxyl (TEMPO) [285], reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization mainly utilizing dithio-carbamates as iniferters (iniferter describes a molecule that functions as an initiator, chain transfer agent and terminator during polymerization) [286], as well as atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) were the free radical is formed by a reversible reduction-oxidation process of added metal complexes [287]. All techniques rely on the principle to drastically reduce the number of free radicals by the formation of a dormant species in equilibrium to an active free radical. By this the characteristic side reactions of free radicals are effectively suppressed. [Pg.423]

The same aplies to polymer brushes. The use of SAMs as initiator systems for surface-initiated polymerization results in defined polymer brushes of known composition and morphology. The different polymerization techniques, from free radical to living ionic polymerizations and especially the recently developed controlled radical polymerization allows reproducible synthesis of strictly linear, hy-perbranched, dentritic or cross-linked polymer layer structures on solids. The added flexibility and functionality results in robust grafted supports with higher capacity and improved accessibility of surface functions. The collective and fast response of such layers could be used for the design of polymer-bonded catalytic systems with controllable activity. [Pg.434]

SIP-driven polymer brush library fabrication leverages the fact that the polymerization initiation species are permanently bound to the substrate. Since the initiators are tethered, controlled delivery of monomer solution to different areas of the substrate results in a grafted polymer library. In NIST work, initiators bound via chlorosilane SAMs to silicon substrates were suitable for conducting controlled atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) [53] and traditional UV free radical polymerization [54, 55]. Suitable monomers are delivered in solution to the surface via microfluidic channels, which enables control over both the monomer solution composition and the time in which the solution is in contact with the initiating groups. After the polymerization is complete, the microchannel is removed from the substrate (or vice versa). This fabrication scheme, termed microchannel confined SIP ([t-SIP), is shown in Fig. 10. In these illustrations, and in the examples discussed below, the microchannels above the substrate are approximately 1 cm wide, 5 cm long, and 300-500 [tm high. [Pg.77]

Husseman M, Malmstrom EE, McNamara M, Mate M, Mecerreyes D, Benoit DG, Hedrick JL, Mansky P, Huang E, RusseU TP, Hawker CJ (1999) Controlled synthesis of polymer brushes by Living free radical polymerization techniques. Macromolecules 32 1424-1431... [Pg.102]

Granville AM, Boyes SG, Akgun B, EosterMD, Brittain WJ. Synthesis and characterization of stimuli-responsive semifluorinated polymer brushes prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization. Macromolecules 2004 37 2790-2796. [Pg.59]

Keywords Graft polymerization Living radical polymerization Polymer brush ... [Pg.3]

Structure and Properties of High-Density Polymer Brushes Prepared by Surface-Initiated Living Radical Polymerization... [Pg.213]

A dense polymer brush is obtained using the grafting from techniques. Surface-initiated polymerization in conjunction with a living polymerization technique is one of the most useful synthetic routes for the precise design and functionalization of the surfaces of various solid materials with well-defined polymers and copolymers. Above all, surface-initiated living radical polymerization (LRP) is particularly promising due to its simplicity and versatility and it has been applied for the synthesis of Au NPs. [Pg.149]

Barbey R, Lavanant L, Paripovic D et al (2009) Polymer brushes via surface-initiated controlled radical polymerization synthesis, characterization, properties, and applications. Chem Rev 109 5437-5527... [Pg.73]

Thermally responsive polymers, such as poly( V-isopropyl acrylamide) (NI-PAm), have also been studied extensively for applications related to those previously discussed [112], De las Heras et al. described the synthesis and patterning of NIPAm brushes on SAMs and their subsequent performance during temperature-dependent adhesion assays of BSA and Streptococcus mutans (Fig. 7). The authors employed p.CP to pattern features of hydrophobic hexadecanethiol and backfilled the surface with an initiator-functionalized alkanethiol. Polymer brushes were grown via surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). FITC-BSA was then... [Pg.115]

So far, there have been only few reports about the synthesis of amphipolar polymer brushes, i.e. with amphiphilic block copolymer side chains. Gna-nou et al. [115] first reported the ROMP of norbornenoyl-endfunctionalized polystyrene-f -poly(ethylene oxide) macromonomers. Due to the low degree of polymerization, the polymacromonomer adopted a star-like rather than a cylindrical shape. Schmidt et al. [123] synthesized amphipolar cylindrical brushes with poly(2-vinylpyridine)-block-polystyrene side chains via radical polymerization of the corresponding block macromonomer. A similar polymer brush with poly(a-methylstyrene)-Wocfc-poly(2-vinylpyridine) side chains was also synthesized by Ishizu et al. via radical polymerization [124]. Using the grafting from approach, Muller et al. [121, 125] synthesized... [Pg.201]


See other pages where Polymer brushes radical polymerization is mentioned: [Pg.413]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.311]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.4 ]




SEARCH



Polymer brushes

Polymer radicals

Polymeric brushes

© 2024 chempedia.info