Polymer blends thermal effects

Keywords Cahn-Hilliard model Diffusion Nonlinear dynamics Pattern selection Polymer blends Soret effect Spinodal decomposition Thermal diffusion... 

Araujo, E.M., Hage, E., and Carvalho, A.J.F. (2004) Thermal properties of nylon6/ABS polymer blends compatibilizer effect. 

Thus, the thermal stabilization of PVC which resulted from the heterogeneous grafting of as little as 3-5% cis-1,4-polybutadiene was more than a simple additive effect and indicates a synergistic interaction. This was demonstrated further by dissolving up to 10% cis-1,4-polybuta-diene in a chlorobenzene suspension or solution of PVC and isolating the polymer blend by precipitation with methanol. Films pressed from the polymer blend were generally deeply colored and contained incompatible, probably gelled or crosslinked, areas. 

The properties of immiscible polymers blends are strongly dependent on the morphology of the blend, with optimal mechanical properties only being obtained at a critical particle size for the dispersed phase. As the size of the dispersed phase is directly proportional to the interfacial tension between the components of the blend, there is much interest in interfacial tension modification. Copolymers, either preformed or formed in situ, can localize at the interface and effectively modify the interfacial tension of polymer blends. The incorporation of PDMS phases is desirable as a method to improve properties such as impact resistance, toughness, tensile strength, elongation at break, thermal stability and lubrication. 

Since there had not been any measurements of thermal diffusion and Soret coefficients in polymer blends, the first task was the investigation of the Soret effect in the model polymer blend poly(dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS) and poly(ethyl-methyl siloxane) (PEMS). This polymer system has been chosen because of its conveniently located lower miscibility gap with a critical temperature that can easily be adjusted within the experimentally interesting range between room temperature and 100 °C by a suitable choice of the molar masses [81, 82], Furthermore, extensive characterization work has already been done for PDMS/PEMS blends, including the determination of activation energies and Flory-Huggins interaction parameters [7, 8, 83, 84],... 

Exclusively mechanically interlocked linear polymer blends, typically, are not thermodynamically phase stable. Given sufficient thermal energy (Tuse>Tg), molecular motion will cause disentanglement of the chains and demixing to occur. To avoid phase separation, crosslinking of one or both components results in the formation of a semi-IPN or full-IPN, respectively. Crosslinking effectively slows or stops polymer molecular diffusion and halts the phase decomposition process. 

Recent studies [111,214] indicate that Th-FFF can even be used to determine the relative chemical composition of two components in random copolymer and linear block copolymers whose monomers do not segregate due to solvent effects. However, this application is limited by the unpredictable nature of thermal diffusion. Nevertheless, combining information from Th-FFF with those derived on fractions by independent detectors selective to composition (such as an IR spectrometer) can yield further insight into the dependence of DT on the chemical composition. Even more powerful is the combination of Th-FFF with SEC as, here, the chemical composition (from Th-FFF) can be studied as a function of the molar mass (from SEC). This was demonstrated by van Asten et al. by cross fractionating copolymers and polymer blends with SEC and Th-FFF [358]. 

In addition to molecular weight, thermal FFF is used to measure transport coefficients. For example, the measurement of thermodiffusion coefficients is important for obtaining compositional information on polymer blends and copolymers (see the entry Thermal FFF of Polymers and Particles). Thermal FFF is also used in fundamental studies of thermodiffusion because it is a relatively fast and accurate method for obtaining the Soret coefficient, which is used to quantify the concentration of material in a temperature gradient. However, the accuracy of Soret and thermodiffusion coefficients obtained from thermal FFF experiments depends on properly accounting for several factors that involve temperature. In order to understand the effect of temperature on transport coefficients, as well as the effect on thermal FFF calibration equations, a brief outline of retention theory is given next. 

The monomer that we have used as a backbone for our work toward flame retardant polymers is commonly called bisphenol C (BPC) or l,l-dichloro-2,2-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl) ethylene. As has been shown by many research groups, BPC can be used as a blendable additive in a commercial plastic or as part of a polymer backbone to effectively impart flame resistance to certain polymeric materials.When thermally decomposed, BPC exothermically produces volatile products such as HCl and CO2, and the unique structure formed upon thermal degradation leads to a very stable carbon structure (char). It is this pyrolysis byproduct and the high char forming nature of BPC that give inherently low flammability and flame retardancy (Fig. 3) in these polymers and blends. 

Applications. Optical microscopy finds several important applications in filled systems, including observation of crystallization and formation of spherulites and phase morphology of polymer blends. " In the first case, important information can be obtained on the effect of filler on matrix crystallization. In polymer blends, fillers may affect phase separation or may be preferentially located in one phase, affecting many physical properties such as conductivity (both thermal and electrical) and mechanical performance. 

As a final consideration, it is relevant to discuss the behaviour of mixtures of different plastics. In fact, one possible process for recovering valuable chemical and petrochemical products from plastic waste is the stepwise thermal degradation of polymer mixtures. This potentially allows the step-by-step simultaneous separation of the different fractions generated by the polymers of the blend. The effect of the mixing scale of PE and PS and their interactions in the melt on the basis of several hypotheses was recently investigated (Faravelli et al., 2003). The first and simplest approach was a completely segregated model which... 

The effect of the shearing on miscibility in polymer blends has been reported to give a modification of the phase diagram (21-24). In our case, we cannot discuss this point because the differences measured in phase-separation times can also be attributed to thermal problems. 

The crosslinking technique forms a PFB/F8BT bilayer with a well-defined interface, and was shown to have a negligible effect on the transport properties as well as the PL and EL emission spectra of the PFB [61], Single-layer, PFB-only and polymer blend LEDs were produced by spin coating 170-nm films from common chloroform solution onto a PEDOTPSS / ITO substrate. For all devices, cathodes were formed by thermal evaporation of Ca (60 nm) and encapsulated with a thick A1 overlayer. 

When applicable, a common method for controlling a redistribution process is to initiate the reaction with a catalyst. Control may then be achieved by quenching the catalyst at the desired extent of reaction. Certain types of redistribution catalyst may thermally decompose under controlled processing conditions that make quenching unnecessary. In these cases, a predominance of block copolymer may be formed that serves as an effective compatibilizer for an immiscible polymer blend. Just as importantly, only a relatively small proportion of the polymer chains actually participates in the redistribution process so that phase separation and the properties attributable to the original sequence distribution are maintained. 

This chapter presents an overview of properties and performance of polymer blends, focusing on these aspects that are outside the main domain of the other Chapters in this Handbook. Such properties as mechanical, chemical and solvent effects, thermal, flame retardancy, electrical and optical properties are discussed. 

Insufficient chemical resistance of a blend at times leads to its rejection for use in an aggressive chemical environment, although it possesses an excellent combination of mechanical properties. Thus chemical and solvent effects on polymer blends are important factors that frequently determine blends applicability. Attention has been given to chemical resistance of blends starting from the fundamental concept of the solubility parameters. Apart from the chemical and environmental restrictions, thermal resistance of a polymer blend is often a major criterion for its applicability. Thus, the thermal conductivity, heat capacity and heat deflection temperature of polymeric materials are discussed in separate sections. 

Plastics, including polymer blends, are relatively high damping and low thermal conductivity materials. Thus, repeated straining of an article leads to a temperature rise within and throughout its body. Rapid stress-strain cycling can significantly heat up the article and thereby induce thermal failure — the phenomenon is frequency-dependent. Where the thermal effect is to be minimized, much lower frequencies, of the order of a few Hz, should be employed. 

Owing to the absence of electronic effects in most polymers, heat conduction occurs as a result of lattice vibrations, similar to dielectrics. It is known that the thermal conductivity of an amorphous polymer increases to T with increasing temperature while it decreases above T [Godovsky, 1992]. Thermal conductivity is a fundamental and important factor in processing polymer blends [Agari, 1992]. 

---