Plotting Methods

Lineweaver-Burk plot Method of analyzing kinetic data (growth rates of enzyme catalyzed reactions) in linear form using a double reciprocal plot of rate versus substrate concentration. 

Graphical analysis of failure data is most commonly plotted using probability. However, in order to understand the hazard plotting method presented here, is not necessary to understand probability plotting. While it is difficult to utilize probability plotting for multiply-censored data, it is... 

The hazard plotting method is presented in detail in the next section followed by the step-by-step instructions on... 

Like all other methods for analyzing censored failure data, the hazard plotting method is also based on a certain assumption that must be satisfied if we are going to rely on the results. The assumption is that if the unfailed units were mn to failure, their failure times would be statistically independent of their censoring times. In other words, there is no relationship or correlation between the censoring time of a unit and the failure time. For example. 

Given next are the different methods for estimating distribution parameters on exponential, Weibull, normal, log normal, and extreme-value hazard papers. The methods are explained with the aid of simulated data from known distributions. Thus, we can judge from the hazard plots how well the hazard-plotting method does. 

The cumulative hazard plotting method and papers presented here provide simple means for statistical analyses of multiply censored failure data to obtain engineering information. The hazard-plotting method is simpler to use for multiply censored data than other plotting methods given in the literature and directly gives failure-rate information not provided by others. 

If we were using the frequency plot method to present this data, we would think that the curve was just assymmetiical and that the distribution was not log-normal. Yet, it is obvious from 5.8.3. that it is log-normal. 

Fig. 3. Schematic of peak purity determination by using the ratio-plot method.

Vu is the total microporous volume known from nitrogen experiment data (t-plot method). 

Zeolite samples (NaY. Na-mordenite and Na-ZSM-5) were prepared in Research Institute for Petroleum and Hydrocarbon Gases in Bratislava. A mesoporous alumina, the carrier for reforming catalyst was used. Porosity of pure mesoporous alumina evaluated by t-plot method did not show the presence of micropores within the range of accuracy of 0.001 cm3/g. Mixtures of zeolites with mesoporous alumina were prepared on the base of dried samples in 5% steps. The prepared mixtures of alumina with zeolite were homogenized in vibration mill. 

Physical adsorption of nitrogen was carried out on an ASAP 2400 Micromeritics apparatus. Before measurements, samples were evacuated overnight at 350 °C at vacuum of 2 Pa. For all samples the same adsorption data table was used. Collected adsorption data were treated by BET-isotherm in the range 0.05 < P/micropore volume and mesopore + external surface, t-plot method, with master isotherm of nonporous alumina (Harkins-Jura) was used, t-plot was linearized in the range of 0.35 < t < 0.6 nm. 

Wilk, M. B., and Gnanadesikan, R. (1968). Probability plotting methods for the analysis of data. Biometrika 55, 1-17. 

The extrapolation may be done separately or simultaneously as in case of Zimm plot method. In Zimm... 

The Litchfield and Wilcoxon (1949) plotting method was once commonly used. It is certainly a valid method, and it poses no more restrictions on study design than those imposed by the probit method. The Litchfield-Wilcoxon method has become a victim of technology as modem, handheld calculators and the ready availability of simple computer programs have made other methods more convenient to run. 

Differences in calibration graph results were found in amount and amount interval estimations in the use of three common data sets of the chemical pesticide fenvalerate by the individual methods of three researchers. Differences in the methods included constant variance treatments by weighting or transforming response values. Linear single and multiple curve functions and cubic spline functions were used to fit the data. Amount differences were found between three hand plotted methods and between the hand plotted and three different statistical regression line methods. Significant differences in the calculated amount interval estimates were found with the cubic spline function due to its limited scope of inference. Smaller differences were produced by the use of local versus global variance estimators and a simple Bonferroni adjustment. 

To compile the data for this table with rectangular coordinates the plotting was done in two scales, the lower values of responses from 1 to 45 response area units and the overall scale for responses greater than 45 area units. For extended range data, however, analysts often use log-log coordinates. Data was thus obtained using this method. Because difficulties were seen in either of these methods, the response versus amount values were plotted after they had been independently transformed as found in Kurtz work ( 2 ). Data from the use of all of these plotting methods are shown in the table. 

The various plotting methods showed differences between them. For Dataset A either the transformed plot was low at the low end or the other two plots were high at the low end. Furthermore the log-log plot appeared to be low at the high end as compared with the other plotting methods. With Dataset B the log-log plot appeared to be low at the high end. In Dataset F all three types of plots gave similar amount values for the unknown responses listed. 

Since the central beam is spread out over a disk, its intensity will lie within the dynamic range of the same detector used to detect the Bragg beams. Hence it can be recorded and used for normalization, so that absolute intensity measurements may be made, and the unsatisfactory Wilson plot method is not needed. 

The chief limitation of this plotting method is that, unlike the Adair Equation, the plot requires that the system obey all of the conditions required by the MWC model. This assumption will often prove to be incorrect ... 

STABILITY CONSTANT DETERMINATION BY A LINEAR PLOT METHOD... 

Five weeJcs after sowing, the broccoli was transplanted into the field while wild mustard was planted directly on the date of broccoli transplant. The area was irrigated every wee)c with overhead sprin-)clers throughout the experiment and fertilized 10.1 L/ha fish emulsion ("Grow Force brand) at 30 and 57 days after set-up of the experiment. The plots were hand weeded selectively every 15 days, samples of the volunteer weeds were ta)cen through the plot method (18), and the number of different species, number of individuals of each species, and biomass (dry weight) were recorded for each plot. The dominance, frequency, density, and importance value were calculated for each species in each plot. 

The calculated binding constants assuming a 1 1 interaction are listed in Table 3. There is a clear difference between the plotting methods. Only by using the x-reciprocal plot does it become clear that there seem to be higher order equilibria between the compounds. The nonlinear regression leads to similar results as with the y-reciprocal fit. The double reciprocal... 

An example involving the akaganeite hematite transformation is shown in Figure 14.8 where the average pore diameter increased from 1.1 nm at 150 °C to 3.7 nm at 350 °C and then to > 15 nm at 500 °C. The t-plot method using H2O as an adsorbate has also been used to investigate the location of H2O in the tunnel structure of akaganeite (Naono et al., 1993). 

The surface area of the catalyst as well as the pore size distribution can easily be measured, and the zeolite and matrix surface areas of the catalyst can be determined by the t-plot method. The different FCC yields can then be plotted as a function of the ZSA/MSA ratio, zeolite surface area or matrix surface area, and valuable information can be obtained [9], The original recommendation was that a residue catalyst should have a large active matrix surface area and a moderate zeolite surface area [10,11]. This recommendation should be compared with the corresponding recommendation for a VGO catalyst a VGO catalyst should have a low-matrix surface area in order to improve the coke selectivity and allow efficient stripping of the carbons from the catalyst [12], Besides precracking the large molecules in the feed, the matrix also must maintain the metal resistance of the catalyst. 

---