Phosphines, £-selectivity

The rhodium-trimethylphosphine system is remarkable because it catalyzes the dimerization of aryl substituted acetylenes, yielding the scarce branched head-to-tail coupling product [12], The iridium species generated from [Ir(COD)Cl]2 and phosphine selectively yields linear ( ) or (Z) enynes from silylalkynes, depending on whether triaryl or tripropylphosphines, respectively, are used [16]. 

Cu H2B(tzN02)2 (PR3)2], [Cu H2B(tzN02)2 (dppe)] and [Cu H2-B(tzN°2)2 (PR3)] have been synthesized from the reaction of CuCl with K H2B(tzN°2)2, and mono or bidentate tertiary phosphines. Selected complexes have also been tested against a panel of several human tumor cell lines.222... 

Bemers-Price SJ, Bowen RJ, Galettis P et al (1999) Stmctural and solution chemistry of gold(l) and silver(l) complexes of bidentate pyridyl phosphines selective antitumour agents. Coord Chem Rev 185-186 823-836... 

Phosphine oxides are prepared similarly[644]. Selective monophosphiny-lation of 2,2 -bis[(lrifluoromethanesulfonyl)oxy]-l,1 -binaphthyl (784) with diphenylphosphine oxide using dppb or dppp as a ligand takes place to give optically active 2-(diarylphosphino)-1,1 -binaphthyl (785). No bis-substitution is observed[645,646]. 

Dimerization is the main path. However, trimerization to form 1.3,6,10-dodecatetraene (15) takes place with certain Pd complexes in the absence of a phosphine ligand. The reaction in benzene at 50 C using 7r-allylpalladium acetate as a catalyst yielded 1,3,6,10-dodecatetraene (15) with a selectivity of 79% at a conversion of 30% based on butadiene in 22 h[ 19,20]. 1,3,7-Octatriene (7) is dimerized to 1,5,7,10.15-hexadecapentaene (16) with 70% selectivity by using bis-rr-allylpalladium. On the other hand. 9-allyl-l,4,6.12-tridecatetraene (17) is formed as the main product when PI13P is added in a 1 1. ratio[21]. 

Hydrometallation is catalyzed by Pd. Hydroboration of l-buten-2-methyl-3-yne (197) with catecholborane (198) gives the 1,4-adduct 199 with 84% selectivity. The ratio of Pd to phosphine (1 1.5) is important[l 10]. The vinyl sulfide 201 is prepared by a one-pot reaction of the thioalkyne 200 via a Pd-catalyzed hydroborution-coupling sequence using dppf as a ligand[l 11]. 

Oxygen and nitrogen also are deterrnined by conductivity or chromatographic techniques following a hot vacuum extraction or inert-gas fusion of hafnium with a noble metal (25,26). Nitrogen also may be deterrnined by the Kjeldahl technique (19). Phosphoms is determined by phosphine evolution and flame-emission detection. Chloride is determined indirecdy by atomic absorption or x-ray spectroscopy, or at higher levels by a selective-ion electrode. Fluoride can be determined similarly (27,28). Uranium and U-235 have been determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (29). 

Dimerization is reportedly catalyzed by pyridine [110-86-1] and phosphines. Trialkylphosphines have been shown to catalyze the conversion of dimer iato trimer upon prolonged standing (2,57). Pyridines and other basic catalysts are less selective because the required iacrease ia temperature causes trimerization to compete with dimerization. The gradual conversion of dimer to trimer ia the catalyzed dimerization reaction can be explained by the assumption of equiUbria between dimer and polar catalyst—dimer iatermediates. The polar iatermediates react with excess isocyanate to yield trimer. Factors, such as charge stabilization ia the polar iatermediate and its lifetime or steric requirement, are reported to be important. For these reasons, it is not currently feasible to predict the efficiency of dimer formation given a particular catalyst. 

The reaction of methyl propionate and formaldehyde in the gas phase proceeds with reasonable selectivity to MMA and MAA (ca 90%), but with conversions of only 30%. A variety of catalysts such as V—Sb on siUca-alumina (109), P—Zr, Al, boron oxide (110), and supported Fe—P (111) have been used. Methjial (dimethoxymethane) or methanol itself may be used in place of formaldehyde and often result in improved yields. Methyl propionate may be prepared in excellent yield by the reaction of ethylene and carbon monoxide in methanol over a mthenium acetylacetonate catalyst or by utilizing a palladium—phosphine ligand catalyst (112,113). 

Pla.tinum. Platinum catalysts that utilize both phosphine and tin(Il) haUde ligands give good rates and selectivities, in contrast to platinum alone, which has extremely low or nonexistent hydroformylation activity. High specificity to the linear aldehyde from 1-pentene or 1-heptene is obtained using HPtSnClgCO(1 1P) (26), active at 100°C and 20 MPa (290 psi) producing 95% -hexanal from 1-pentene. 

In the presence of a large excess of PH, primary phosphines, RPH2, are formed predominantiy. Secondary phosphines, R2PH, must be either isolated from mixtures with primary and tertiary products or made in special multistep procedures. Certain secondary phosphines can be produced if steric factors preclude conversion to a tertiary product. Both primary and secondary phosphines can be substituted with olefins. After the proper selection of substituents, mixed phosphines of the type RRTH or RR R T can be made. 

Ahphatic phosphines can be gases, volatile Hquids, and oils. Aromatic phosphines frequentiy are crystalline, although many are oils. Physical properties of selected phosphines are Hsted in Table 14. 

Homogeneous rhodium-catalyzed hydroformylation (135,136) of propene to -butyraldehyde (qv) was commercialized in 1976. -Butyraldehyde is a key intermediate in the synthesis of 2-ethyIhexanol, an important plasticizer alcohol. Hydroformylation is carried out at <2 MPa (<290 psi) at 100°C. A large excess of triphenyl phosphine contributes to catalyst life and high selectivity for -butyraldehyde (>10 1) yielding few side products (137). Normally, product separation from the catalyst [Rh(P(C2H2)3)3(CO)H] [17185-29-4] is achieved by distillation. 

Conventional triorganophosphite ligands, such as triphenylphosphite, form highly active hydroformylation catalysts (95—99) however, they suffer from poor durabiUty because of decomposition. Diorganophosphite-modified rhodium catalysts (94,100,101), have overcome this stabiUty deficiency and provide a low pressure, rhodium catalyzed process for the hydroformylation of low reactivity olefins, thus making lower cost amyl alcohols from butenes readily accessible. The new diorganophosphite-modified rhodium catalysts increase hydroformylation rates by more than 100 times and provide selectivities not available with standard phosphine catalysts. For example, hydroformylation of 2-butene with l,l -biphenyl-2,2 -diyl... 

The hydroformylation reaction is carried out in the Hquid phase using a metal carbonyl catalyst such as HCo(CO)4 (36), HCo(CO)2[P( -C4H2)] (37), or HRh(CO)2[P(CgH3)2]2 (38,39). The phosphine-substituted rhodium compound is the catalyst of choice for new commercial plants that can operate at 353—383 K and 0.7—2 MPa (7—20 atm) (39). The differences among the catalysts are found in their intrinsic activity, their selectivity to straight-chain product, their abiHty to isomerize the olefin feedstock and hydrogenate the product aldehyde to alcohol, and the ease with which they are separated from the reaction medium (36). 

A Belgian patent (178) claims improved ethanol selectivity of over 62%, starting with methanol and synthesis gas and using a cobalt catalyst with a hahde promoter and a tertiary phosphine. At 195°C, and initial carbon monoxide pressure of 7.1 MPa (70 atm) and hydrogen pressure of 7.1 MPa, methanol conversions of 30% were indicated, but the selectivity for acetic acid and methyl acetate, usehil by-products from this reaction, was only 7%. Ruthenium and osmium catalysts (179,180) have also been employed for this reaction. The addition of a bicycHc trialkyl phosphine is claimed to increase methanol conversion from 24% to 89% (181). 

The high diffusivity and low viscosity of sub- and supercritical fluids make them particularly attractive eluents for enantiomeric separations. Mourier et al. first exploited sub- and supercritical eluents for the separation of phosphine oxides on a brush-type chiral stationary phase [28]. They compared analysis time and resolution per unit time for separations performed by LC and SFC. Although selectivity (a) was comparable in LC and SFC for the compounds studied, resolution was consistently... 

Macaudiere et al. first reported the enantiomeric separation of racemic phosphine oxides and amides on native cyclodextrin-based CSPs under subcritical conditions [53]. The separations obtained were indicative of inclusion complexation. When the CO,-methanol eluent used in SFC was replaced with hexane-ethanol in LC, reduced selectivity was observed. The authors proposed that the smaller size of the CO, molecule made it less likely than hexane to compete with the analyte for the cyclodextrin cavity. 

---