Performance evaluation standards

In the last entry in Table III more than 50 samples were extracted in an experiment surveying the performance of laboratory robotic equipment. These included 2.0 gram samples of soils extracted with pure C02,2.5 gram samples of a reverse phase material extracted with C02 and mixtures of C02 with various modifiers, 2.0 gram samples of ground coffee plus aliquots of modifiers dispersed on the samples within the sample thimble extracted with pure CO and 20 microliter aliquots of performance evaluation standard (PES, octadecane in isooctane) on simple matrices extracted with pure C02. The variety of analytes and complex matrices along with the number of different runs clearly show that the instrumentation is reliable. 

Table VII. Repeatability HP 7680A Performance Evaluation Standard a...

Figure 4. Chromatographic analysis of extracted fractions produced by extracting a "check-out" sample, the Performance Evaluation Standard, for the HP7680A SFE on two occasions one year apart.

If an option proves to be technically ineffective or inappropriate, it is deleted from the list of potential alternatives. Either follo ving or concurrent with the technical evaluation, an economic study is performed, weighing standard measures of profitability such as payback period, investment returns, and net present value. Many of these costs (or, more appropriately, cost saving may be substantial yet are difficult to quantify. (Refer to Economic Considerations Associated with Pollution Prevention.)... 

All the analytical data are from the same laboratory consequently, interlaboratory analytical variation is not a factor. The intralaboratory variation for that laboratory was 9.1 percent (i.e., the relative standard deviation based on repetitive analyses of performance evaluation samples). 

Matrix effects were evaluated by Gago-Ferrero et al. [23]. Both signal suppression and signal enhancement were observed. The extent of these effects was found to be fairly dependent on the UV filter. Thus, quantification should be performed by standard addition or internal standard calibration. Since standard addition is a high time-consuming procedure, internal standard calibration with appropriate isotopi-cally labeled compounds is the best option. 

Combining both heating and nonheating protocols employed in a sequential order were evaluated, but without any advantage (Fig. 3.4). RT-PCR was performed by standard methods, RNA extracted from fresh MDA cells and human tissue of breast cancer with known tested genes was used as positive control, and pure water was used to replace template (cDNA) as negative control for every experiment of PCR. To assure the accuracy of PCR tests, all reactions were performed in triplicate. 

To accomplish the first step, model standards will be evolved on the basis of legislative mandates and r ulatoiy needs. Each of the various types of model has undergone performance evaluation through the application of a set of tests peculiar to its own structure or output. For... 

The ISO has also produced a set of quality standards specifically for environmental management. This is the ISO 14000 series. The areas addressed by ISO 14000 are Environmental Management Systems, Environmental Performance Evaluations, Environmental Auditing, Life Cycle Assessment, and Environmental Labeling. 

Interlaboratory Quality Control. In addition to the mandatory quality control practices just outlined, the laboratory is encouraged to participate in interlaboratory programs such as relevant performance evaluation (PE) studies, analysis of standard reference materials, and split sample analyses. Participation in interlaboratory analytical method validation studies is also encouraged. 

The key advantages of simple weighting/scoring are ease of use and under-standability. Also, the evaluation itself does not require special software packages but can be performed with standard spreadsheet software. Special software tools such as VISA however contain features such as comprehensive sensitivity analyses, which are cumbersome to implement in spreadsheet software. 

To establish a standard for data comparability, the EPA conducts laboratory performance evaluation (PE) studies that include common environmental pollutants. Results of the studies are statistically evaluated, and the derived acceptance criteria establish a standard for interlaboratory data comparability. These studies, however,... 

When the PQ is undertaken, always consider calibrator tablets, or a performance verification standard. This standard should be a well-characterized and stable product. The performance qualification should be conducted to evaluate all components of the test, including the analyst, equipment, environment, and method. 

Myers, D., K. Emery, C. Gueymard, Revising and Validating Spectral Irradiance Reference Standards for Photovoltaic Performance Evaluation. ASME Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 2004. 126 p. 567-574. 

For data-parallel environments (SIMD programming model), performance can be represented using standard profiling techniques that associate fraction of overall execution time with particular pieces of code. As noted earlier, this programming model has limited utility for the applications we address, and we do not dwell on performance evaluation. 

For most regulatory applications, the method chosen will have been subjected to preliminary method development studies and a collaborative study, both carried out according to standard protocols. This process, and subsequent acceptance, forms the validation of the method. For example, the AOAC/IUPAC protocol [5, 6] provides guidelines for both method development and collaborative study. Typically, method development forms an iterative process of performance evaluation and refinement, using increasingly powerful tests as development progresses, and culminating in collaborative study. On the basis of the results of these studies,... 

---