Packed columns interfacial area

Other correlations based partially on theoretical considerations but made to fit existing data also exist (71—75). A number of researchers have also attempted to separate from a by measuring the latter, sometimes in terms of the wetted area (76—78). Finally, a number of correlations for the mass transfer coefficient itself exist. These ate based on a mote fundamental theory of mass transfer in packed columns (79—82). Although certain predictions were verified by experimental evidence, these models often cannot serve as design basis because the equations contain the interfacial area as an independent variable. 

The effective interfacial area depends on a number of factors, as discussed in a review by Charpentier [C/j m. Eng.J., 11, 161 (1976)]. Among these factors are (1) the shape and size of packing, (2) the packing material (for example, plastic generally gives smaller interfacial areas than either metal or ceramic), (3) the liquid mass velocity, and (4), for smaU-diameter towers, the column diameter. 

Rizzuti et al. [Chem. Eng. Sci, 36, 973 (1981)] examined the influence of solvent viscosity upon the effective interfacial area in packed columns and concluded that for the systems studied the effective interfacial area a was proportional to the kinematic viscosity raised to the 0.7 power. Thus, the hydrodynamic behavior of a packed absorber is strongly affected by viscosity effects. Surface-tension effects also are important, as expressed in the work of Onda et al. (see Table 5-28-D). 

Liquid Dispersion Spray columns are used with slurries or when the reaction product is a solid. The absorption of SO9 by a hme slurry is an example. In the treatment of phosphate rock with sulfuric acid, offgases contain HF and SiF4. In a spray column with water, solid particles of fluorosilic acid are formed but do not harm the spray operation. The coefficient /cl in spray columns is about the same as in packed columns, but the spray interfacial area is much lower. Considerable backmixing of the gas also takes place, which helps to make the spray volumetri-caUy inefficient. Deentrainment at the outlet usually is needed. 

In this process, the two streams flow countercurrently through the column and undergo a continuous change in composition. At any location are in dynamic rather than thermodynamic equilibium. Such processes are frequently carried out in packed columns, in which the liquid (or one of the two liquids in the case of a liquid-liquid extraction process) wets die surface of the packing, thus increasing the interfacial area available for mass transfer and, in addition, promoting high film mass transfer coefficients within each phase. 

In order to obtain a high rate of humidification, the area of contact between the air and the water is made as large as possible by supplying the water in the form of a fine spray alternatively, the interfacial area is increased by using a packed column. Evaporation occurs if the humidity at the surface is greater than that in the bulk of the air that is, if the temperature of the water is above the dew point of the air. 

There are surprisingly few studies of the retention mechanism for open tubular columns but the theory presented for packed columns should be equally applicable. For normal film thicknesses open tubular columns have a large surface area/volume ratio and the contribution of interfacial adsorption to retention should be significant for those solutes that exhibit adsorption tendencies. Interfacial adsorption has been shown to affect the reproducibility of retention for columns prepared with nonpolar phases of different film thicknesses [322-324]. The poor reproducibility of retention index values for columns prepared from polar phases was demonstrated to be c(ue to interfacial... 

From the analysis given already of the diffusional nature of absorption, one of the outstanding requirements is to provide as large an interfacial area of contact as possible between the phases. For this purpose, columns similar to those used for distillation are suitable. However, whereas distillation columns are usually tall and thin absorption columns are more likely to be short and fat. In addition, equipment may be used in which gas is passed into a liquid which is agitated by a stirrer. A few special forms of units have also been used, although it is the packed column which is most frequently used for gas absorption applications. 

SAHAY, B. N. and SHARMA, M. M. Chem.Eng. Sci. 28 (1973) 41. Effective interfacial areas and liquid and gas side mass transfer coefficients in a packed column. 

The mechanism of transfer of solute from one phase to the second is one of molecular and eddy diffusion and the concepts of phase equilibrium, interfacial area, and surface renewal are all similar in principle to those met in distillation and absorption, even though, in liquid-liquid extraction, dispersion is effected by mechanical means including pumping and agitation, except in standard packed columns. 

The best values of the parameter Cj are 1.51, 1.36, and 2.01 for no mass transfer, d and c direetion of transfer respectively. The product af is considered as the agitation variable in the equation, since the fit could not be improved if a and / were treated separately. The average absolute value of the relative deviation in the predicted values of d 2 from the experimental points is 16.3%. Even in packed columns, the separation can be substantially improved by pulsing of the continuous phase resulting from greater shear forces that reduce the drop size and increase the interfacial area [1, Chapter 8]. 

The mass transfer coefficients considered so far - namely, kQ,kj, KQ,andKj - are defined with respect to known interfacial areas. However, the interfacial areas in equipment such as the packed column and bubble column are indefinite, and vary with operating conditions such as fluid velocities. It is for this reason that the volumetric coefficients defined with respect to the unit volume of the equipment are used, or more strictly, the unit packed volume in the packed column or the unit volume of liquid containing bubbles in the bubble column. Corresponding to /cg, Kq, and we define k a, k, a, K, /i, and K a, all of which have units of (kmol h m )/(kmol m ) - that is, (h ). Although the volumetric coefficients are often regarded as single coefficients, it is more reasonable to consider a separately from the Ar-terms, because the effective interfacial area per unit packed volume or unit volume of liquid-gas mixture a (m m ) varies not only with operating conditions such as fluid velocities but also with the types of operation, such as physical absorption, chemical absorption, and vaporization. 

The effective interfacial areas for absorption with a chemical reaction [6] in packed columns are the same as those for physical absorption, except that absorption is accompanied by rapid, second-order reactions. For absorption with a moderately fast first-order or pseudo first-order reaction, almost the entire interfacial area is effective, because the absorption rates are independent of as can be seen... 

Why is the effective interfacial area, a, for gas-phase controlled gas absorption much smaller than that for vaporization in packed columns (Figure 6.5)... 

With regards to handling data on industrial apparatus for gas-liquid mass transfer (such as packed columns, bubble columns, and stirred tanks), it is more practical to use volumetric mass transfer coefficients, such as KqU and K a, because the interfacial area a cannot be well defined and will vary with operating conditions. As noted in Section 6.7.2, the volumetric mass transfer coefficients for packed columns are defined with respect to the packed volume - that is, the sum of the volumes of gas, liquid, and packings. In contrast, volumetric mass transfer coefficients, which involve the specific gas-liquid interfacial area a (L L 5), for liquid-gas bubble systems (such as gassed stirred tanks and bubble columns) are defined with respect to the unit volume of gas-liquid mixture or of clear liquid volume, excluding the gas bubbles. In this book, we shall use a for the specific interfacial area with respect to the clear liquid volume, and a for the specific interfacial area with respect to the total volume of gas-liquid mixture. 

The influence of pressure on the mass transfer in a countercurrent packed column has been scarcely investigated to date. The only systematic experimental work has been made by the Research Group of the INSA Lyon (F) with Professor M. Otterbein el al. These authors [8, 9] studied the influence of the total pressure (up to 15 bar) on the gas-liquid interfacial area, a, and on the volumetric mass-transfer coefficient in the liquid phase, kia, in a countercurrent packed column. The method of gas-liquid absorption with chemical reaction was applied with different chemical systems. The results showed the increase of the interfacial area with increasing pressure, at constant gas-and liquid velocities. The same trend was observed for the variation of the volumetric liquid mass-transfer coefficient. The effect of pressure on kia was probably due to the influence of pressure on the interfacial area, a. In fact, by observing the ratio, kia/a, it can be seen that the liquid-side mass-transfer coefficient, kL, is independent of pressure. 

B. Benadda, M. Otterbein, K. Kafoufi and M. Prost, Influence of pressure on the gas-liquid interfacial area a and the coefficient ki.a in a countercurrent packed column, Chem. Engng. Processing, 35 (1996) 247-253. 

Therefore, in this set of circumstances, JA will be large if a is large a large interfacial area a is required in the reactor but the liquid hold-up is not important. A packed column, for example, would be suitable. 

The liquid holdup of the packing section decreases, which leads to a lower conversion of the kinetically controlled reactions of C02 and a reduction in the C02 absorption rate. As a consequence, the solvent mole fractions of HC()3 and carbamate decreases whereas the relative fraction of HS increases. The selectivity of the absorption process toward the H2S and HCN reduction is enhanced by minimizing the liquid holdup of the column. At the same time, a larger interfacial area improves the performance of the plant. Therefore, modem industrial sour gas scrubbers should be equipped with structured packings. 

---