Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Best-fit values

This example also illustrates that best-fit values of Q and e are not absolute. [Pg.447]

This approach to separating the different types of interaetions eontributing to a net solvent effeet has elieited much interest. Tests of the tt, a, and p seales on other solvatochromie or related proeesses have been made, an alternative tt seale based on ehemieally different solvatochromie dyes has been proposed, and the contribution of solvent polarizability to ir has been studied. Opinion is not unanimous, however, that the Kamlet-Taft system eonstitutes the best or ultimate extrathermodynamie approaeh to the study of solvent effeets. There are two objections One of these is to the averaging process by which many model phenomena are eombined to yield a single best-fit value. We eneountered this problem in Section 7.2 when we eonsidered alternative definitions of the Hammett substituent eonstant, and similar eomments apply here Reiehardt has diseussed this in the eontext of the Kamlet-Taft parameters. - The seeond objeetion is to the elaim of generality for the parameters and the eorrelation equation we will return to this eontroversy later. [Pg.440]

The objective is to find the best-fit values of AS and AHx. The results of four calculations are summarized here, using unweighted and weighted (1/y2) data in the two equations. [Pg.40]

The fit with H= 1.53 is quite good. The results for the fits with n = 1 andn = 2 show systematic deviations between the data and the fitted model. The reaction order is approximately 1.5, and this value could be used instead of n= 1.53 with nearly the same goodness of fit, a = 0.00654 versus 0.00646. This result should motivate a search for a mechanism that predicts an order of 1.5. Absent such a mechanism, the best-fit value of 1.53 may as well be retained. [Pg.219]

There are surprisingly few microbeam studies of zircon-melt partitioning in natural systems and none in experimental systems. Recently Thomas et al. (2002) have derived zircon-melt partition coefficients from rehomogenised glass inclusions in zircons from an intrusive tonalite, while Hinton et al. (R. Hinton, S. Marshall and R. Macdonald, written comm.) have used an ion-microprobe to measure zircon-melt partition coefficients from a Kenyan peralkaline rhyolite, with an estimated eruption temperature of 700°C (Scaillet and Macdonald 2001). We have used the lanthanide partition coefficients from these two studies to derive best-fit values for and for the large Vlll-co-ordinated site. In total there are 13 individual sets of partition coefficients. All of these yield broadly consistent values of, in the range 0.968-1.018 A, but very variable, in the range 373-1575 GPa. Because Lu is comparable in size to cannot be well... [Pg.115]

The best-fit values for kM and kd obtained by a non-linear least squares method were 3.8 x 10-4s-1 and 1.2 x 10-4M-1s-1 respectively. [Pg.265]

Here, eM, Ml, and / Ml2 are the respective extinction coefficients of all participants of Eq. (1) and [Mb is the total concentration of 1. The values of Kl and K2]j are summarized in Table II. The solid line in the inset was calculated using the best-fit values of mt / Ml2, A l, and K2h, while the broken line is the calculated prediction if K2l 0. The broken line deviates systematically from the experimental points confirming the binding of the second pyridine-type ligand. Imidazole behaves similarly (27). [Pg.476]

After a number of new solutions are produced by crossover (or more generally, recombination) and mutation operations, improved solutions must be incorporated into the population. The best solution found thus far is almost always retained. A common strategy replaces a certain fraction of the remaining individuals, either with improved offspring or with new individuals chosen to maintain diversity. Another strategy is tournament selection, in which new solutions and current population members compete in a tournament. Each solution competes with K other solutions, which may be randomly selected, and, in each pairwise comparison, the solution with best fitness value wins. If P is the population size, the P solutions with the most wins become the new population. [Pg.403]

Anti-protonic atoms. Recently neutron density distributions in a series of nuclei were deduced from anti-protonic atoms [30], The basic method determines the ratio of neutron and proton distributions at large differences by means of a measurement of the annihilation products which indicates whether the antiproton was captured on a neutron or a proton. In the analysis two assumptions are made. First a best fit value for the ratio I / of the imaginary parts of the free space pp and pn scattering lengths equal to unity is adopted. Secondly in order to reduce the density ratio at the annihilation side to a a ratio of rms radii a two-parameter Fermi distribution is assumed. The model dependence introduced by these assumptions is difficult to judge. Since a large number of nuclei have been measured one may argue that the value of Rj is fixed empirically. [Pg.107]

Figure 4.9. Best-fit friction factor y versus experimental time span for 43-bp fragment. The sample is in 0.1 M NaCl, 10 mM cacodylate, 1 mM EDTA, at pH 8.6 and T = 20°C. Twelve data sets were averaged to obtain the best-lit friction factors for each time span. The dashed line is the average of the best-fit values for all four time spans. Figure 4.9. Best-fit friction factor y versus experimental time span for 43-bp fragment. The sample is in 0.1 M NaCl, 10 mM cacodylate, 1 mM EDTA, at pH 8.6 and T = 20°C. Twelve data sets were averaged to obtain the best-lit friction factors for each time span. The dashed line is the average of the best-fit values for all four time spans.
The solid lines in Fig. 15, which refer to the data for reaction of the 4,6-bis(phenylazo)resorcinol monoanion in 2-methylphenol buffers at two buffer ratios are plots of (31) using best-fit values of and and the... [Pg.340]

The simultaneous solution of the equations for ai, 02, and K will yield an a versus X curve if all the underlying parameters were known. To this end, Futerko and Hsing fitted the numerical solutions of these simultaneous equations to the experimental points on the above-discussed water vapor uptake isotherms of Hinatsu et al. This determined the best fit values of x and X was first assumed to be constant, and in improved calculations, y was assumed to have a linear dependence on 02, which slightly improved the results in terms of estimated data fitting errors. The authors also describe methods for deriving the temperature dependences of x and K using the experimental data of other workers. [Pg.322]

The smaller contribution to solvent proton relaxation due to the slow exchanging regime also allows detection of second and outer sphere contributions (62). In fact outer-sphere and/or second sphere protons contribute less than 5% of proton relaxivity for the highest temperature profile, and to about 30% for the lowest temperature profile. The fact that they affect differently the profiles acquired at different temperature influences the best-fit values of all parameters with respect to the values obtained without including outer and second sphere contributions, and not only the value of the first sphere proton-metal ion distance (as it usually happens for the other metal aqua ions). A simultaneous fit of longitudinal and transverse relaxation rates provides the values of the distance of the 12 water protons from the metal ion (2.71 A), of the transient ZFS (0.11 cm ), of the correlation time for electron relaxation (about 2 x 10 s at room temperature), of the reorienta-tional time (about 70 x 10 s at room temperature), of the lifetime (about 7 x 10 s at room temperature), of the constant of contact interaction (2.1 MHz). A second coordination sphere was considered with 26 fast exchanging water protons at 4.5 A from the metal ion (99), and the distance of closest approach was fixed in the range between 5.5 and 6.5 A. [Pg.161]

Fig. 8. Intensities as a function of time (circles) and best fit values (solid lines) of the six lines in the carbonyl spectrum of Ru2(CO)6(/U2-PPh2)(/.t2-r / -C=C-r-Pr), following a selective inversion. The lines have been offset along the y axis for the sake of clarity. Fig. 8. Intensities as a function of time (circles) and best fit values (solid lines) of the six lines in the carbonyl spectrum of Ru2(CO)6(/U2-PPh2)(/.t2-r / -C=C-r-Pr), following a selective inversion. The lines have been offset along the y axis for the sake of clarity.
The result is shown as the solid line in Fig. 6. They noted [l9] that when no restriction was placed on the value of G°(e q), a best-fit value of 4.3 molecules (100 eV) was obtained for this parameter. [Pg.344]

Also, a recent inversion of helioseismic data including special relativistic corrections to the equations of state claims a best-fit value for the age of the Sun of tseis = 4.57 0.11 Ga (Bonanno, Schlattl, and Paterno, 2002). [Pg.95]


See other pages where Best-fit values is mentioned: [Pg.286]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.674]    [Pg.675]    [Pg.675]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.668]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.230]   


SEARCH



Fit value

Fitness value

© 2024 chempedia.info