Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Other Viscosity Parameters

In general, the viscosity will be a function of the physical-chemical nature of the dispersion or substance, its temperature (usually t] drops as T increases), its pressure (usually increasing P compresses and increases the intermolecular resistance, increasing t]), the applied shear rate (as seen above this can either increase or decrease viscosity), and time (for many dispersions their recent history influences the present viscosity). An important consequence is that if one wishes to determine viscosity as a function of one of these parameters then the other four must be kept well defined (usually constant). [Pg.180]

It was just stated that the viscosity of liquids and dispersions usually decreases as temperature increases. An exception is the case of gases whose viscosities usually increase slightly with temperature, with a temperature coefficient of about 0.3% per degree Kelvin [383]. The viscosities of liquids usually decrease with increasing temperature, and more strongly. A number of equations, of varying degrees of complexity, have been formulated to enable one to empirically predict liquid viscosities as a function of temperature [384—386]. A simple, often used, relation is the Andrade equation, [Pg.180]

In the petroleum industry a dimensionless number termed the viscosity index has been used to describe the temperature dependence of a fluid s kinematic viscosity. The calculation of viscosity index involves the use of published look-up tables [388], In terms of relative changes, a higher viscosity index represents a smaller decrease in viscosity with increasing temperature. [Pg.180]

Example Multigrade lubricating oils. The viscosity grading of some automotive engine oils is shown in the table below [389]. [Pg.181]

SAE viscosity grade Maximum absolute viscosity at-18°C, mPa-s Minimum kinematic viscosity at +100 °C, mm2/s Maximum kinematic viscosity at +100 C, mm2/s [Pg.181]


The following is a brief review of the viscosity pareimeters that are commonly used in polymer analyses. The relative viscosity (ripgi) of a polymer saitple solution as defined in Equation 1 can be determined experimentally from the measured viscosity value for the polymer saitple solution (h) and that of the solvent (h )- From the h -1 value and the polymer sanple concentration (c), tne calculations for the other viscosity parameters are possible in accordance to Equations 2 through 5 ... [Pg.81]

In addition to the apparent viscosity two other material parameters can be obtained using simple shear flow viscometry. These are primary and secondary nomial stress coefficients expressed, respectively, as... [Pg.5]

Although the viscosity index is useful for characterizing petroleum oils, other viscosity—temperature parameters are employed periodically. Viscosity temperature coefficients (VTCs) give the fractional drop in viscosity as temperature increases from 40 to 100°C and is useful in characterizing behavior of siHcones and some other synthetics. With petroleum base stocks, VTC tends to remain constant as increasing amounts of VI improvers are added. Constant B in equation 9, the slope of the line on the ASTM viscosity—temperature chart, also describes viscosity variation with temperature. [Pg.240]

Using other methods for the calculation of plate count can result in different numbers, depending on peak shape. It should also be kept in mind that many other operational parameters, such as eluent viscosity, column temperature, flow rate, and injection volume, will influence the results of the plate count determination. [Pg.284]

The effect of MW and MWD on the solid state properties have been extensively studied [11,12,82]. These studies have been made both on fractionated and whole polymer samples. Attempts have also been made to correlate the solution viscosity, melt viscosity, MFI and other related parameters, which represent the MW and MWD of the polymers, with the solid state properties. Table 6 summarizes the results of various studies on effect of MW and MWD on the properties of PEs. [Pg.288]

In a few studies, solvent viscosity was varied as a result of change in temperature [109, 165]. In transient flow, the direct effect of temperature on the scission rate was shown to be minimal (Sect. 5.7). Even so, it is desirable to look for a system where the solvent viscosity can be studied independently of the other kinetics parameters [166], Ideally, the solvents used should satisfy the following criteria ... [Pg.153]

Fio. 29. Average steady-state size of the dispersed phase at different viscosity ratios. The solid and dashed lines represent simulations in which and /xc are held constant. Other process parameters are the same as used for Fig. 28 (except 0 = 0.05). It is clear that the magnitudes of both viscosities must be considered rather than just the viscosity ratio. The lowest viscosity in each case is 1 Pa - s and the highest 1000 Pa - s. The curves are equally spaced on a logarithmic scale for viscosity. [Pg.159]

Their bulk properties as well as their chemical composition can characterize crude oils. Distillation of cmde oil provides fraction profiles over a certain boiling range. The crude oil as well as the distillation fractions can be described in terms of density, viscosity, refractive index, sulfur content, and other bulk parameters. [Pg.203]

While the resulting model is not quantitatively predictive, important observations can be made based on parametric simulation studies. It is proposed that changes in viscosity due to wafer temperature may be as large as 30%, and that such viscosity dependencies can have significant impact on fluid film thickness and transitively on removal rate. The importance of other process parameters, such as wafer curvature, is also indicated by the model. [Pg.96]

Campbell and Hanratty (1982) used Lau s (1980) measurements with some special optics on a laser Doppler velocimetry system to calculate /3(f) near a fixed interface, in this case, the inside of a clear pipe. They determined w(z,t) from equation (8.52), and solved equations (8.49) and (8.50) numerically for / l(0- Finally, they applied equation (8.51) to determine Kl, which has been the goal all along. The end results (Kl) may then be related to the other, independent parameters that are important to the transfer process, such as diffusivity, viscosity, and turbulence parameters. Campbell and Hanratty performed this operation and found the following correlation ... [Pg.220]

Upon mixing and injection of the caprolactam monomer streams into the rheological instrument, polymerization was initiated and continued, whereas simultaneously monitoring the complex viscosity and other rheological parameters of the polymerizing system. The maximum measurable complex viscosity levels were achieved in about 100 s or less, depending on temperature. [Pg.56]

In several previous papers, the possible existence of thermal anomalies was suggested on the basis of such properties as the density of water, specific heat, viscosity, dielectric constant, transverse proton spin relaxation time, index of refraction, infrared absorption, and others. Furthermore, based on other published data, we have suggested the existence of kinks in the properties of many aqueous solutions of both electrolytes and nonelectrolytes. Thus, solubility anomalies have been demonstrated repeatedly as have anomalies in such diverse properties as partial molal volumes of the alkali halides, in specific optical rotation for a number of reducing sugars, and in some kinetic data. Anomalies have also been demonstrated in a surface and interfacial properties of aqueous systems ranging from the surface tension of pure water to interfacial tensions (such as between n-hexane or n-decane and water) and in the surface tension and surface potentials of aqueous solutions. Further, anomalies have been observed in solid-water interface properties, such as the zeta potential and other interfacial parameters. [Pg.77]

Fig. 8 Only the viscosities Vj and V3 can influence the critical parameters significantly. The upper row depicts the dependence on a isotropic variation of the viscosity. In the middle and lower row we present the variation with v2 and V3 setting the other viscosities to v, = 0.1. Here the thick solid lines represent the minimal set of variables. For the full set of variables we have chosen four different values of X the solid curves with X = 0.7, the dashed curves with X = 1.3, the dotted curves with X = 2 and the dot-dashed curves with X = 3.5. Note the similarities between the curves for small (solid) and large X (dot-dashed) in the upper and middle row. In these regimes v2 is the dominating viscosity... Fig. 8 Only the viscosities Vj and V3 can influence the critical parameters significantly. The upper row depicts the dependence on a isotropic variation of the viscosity. In the middle and lower row we present the variation with v2 and V3 setting the other viscosities to v, = 0.1. Here the thick solid lines represent the minimal set of variables. For the full set of variables we have chosen four different values of X the solid curves with X = 0.7, the dashed curves with X = 1.3, the dotted curves with X = 2 and the dot-dashed curves with X = 3.5. Note the similarities between the curves for small (solid) and large X (dot-dashed) in the upper and middle row. In these regimes v2 is the dominating viscosity...
Out of the five viscosities, only two (V2 and V3) show a significant influence on the critical values. In Fig. 8 we present the dependence of 9C and qc on an assumed isotropic viscosity (upper row) and on these two viscosity coefficients (middle and lower row). Since the flow alignment parameter X has a remarkable influence on these curves we have chosen four different values of X in this figure, namely X = 0.7, X = 1.1, X = 2, and X = 3.5. The curves for X < 1 and X > 3 for an isotropic viscosity tensor are very similar to the corresponding curves where only V2 is varied. In this parameter range the coefficient V2 dominates the behavior. Note that the influence of V3 on the critical values is already much smaller than that of V2. We left out the equivalent graphs for the other viscosity coefficients, because they have almost no effect on the critical values. For further comments on the influence of an anisotropic viscosity tensor see also Sect. 3.4. [Pg.122]

A more convenient extrapolation technique is to approximate the experimental data with a viscosity model. The Power Law, shown in Eq. 6, is the most commonly used two-parameter model. The Bingham model, shown in Eq. 7, postulates a linear relationship between x and y but can lead to overprediction of the yield stress. Extrapolation of the nonlinear Casson model (1954), shown in Eq. 8, is straightforward from a linear plot of x°5 vs y05. Application of the Herschel-Bulkley model (1926), shown in Eq. 9, is more tedious and less certain although systematic procedures for determining the yield value and the other model parameters are available (11) ... [Pg.350]

Pitch H and screw speed n are available as free parameters for optimization of the pressure build-up zones. Most other process parameters such as throughput, discharge pressure, and material (viscosity) are already set by customer specifications. [Pg.297]

Experimental evidence on whether L or other molecular parameters (Stokes radius, viscosity radius, radius of gyration, the product of intrinsic viscosity and molecular weight, etc.) govern partitioning in SEC supports has been summarized by Dubin [29]. He concludes that none of these parameters perfectly correlates with SEC partitioning when a wide variety of macromolecules, of both rigid and flexible structure, are used as test probes. This may result from the complex uncharacterized nature of the pore space occupying the porous supports commonly utilized. [Pg.35]

Hydrothermal reactions typically produce nanometer-sized particles that can be quenched to form a nanoparticle powder or cross-linked to produce nanocrystalline stmctures (Feng and Xu, 2001). Hydrothermal conditions allow for reduction in solubilities of ionic materials and thus more rapid nucleation and increased ion mobility, resulting in faster growth. Via judicious choice of the hydrothermal conditions, a measure of control can be exerted over the size and morphology of the materials. As mentioned earlier, the viscosity and ionic strength of solvents is a function of the temperature and pressure at which the reaction is carried out. Other experimental parameters, such as the precursor material and the pH, have... [Pg.219]

Other aspects of transport phenomena including activation energies for viscosity parameters and Washburn transport numbers (Feakins, 1974a Feakins and Lorimer, 1974) have also been measured to probe ion-solvent interactions in mixed solvent systems. [Pg.314]

Galileo number, Ga, and other geometrical parameters of the vessel, such as H /d, where H is the height of liquid above the stirrer, and the ratio dr/dt. The dependence of JVmax on the kinematic viscosity of the liquid is stronger at larger values of Ga. [Pg.109]

Pure dephasing describes the adiabatic modulation of the vibrational energy levels of a transition caused by fast fluctuations of its environment (29,30). Measurement of this quantity, and how this quantity changes with temperature, solvent, viscosity, or other experimental parameter, provides detailed insight into the dynamics of the system. [Pg.248]

If you are dealing with liquids or gases, try to find the viscosity (or other rheological parameters). [Pg.229]

Where Tb is the molal average boiling point of the fraction in degrees Rankin and s is the specific gravity of the Iraction. The K-factor can be correlated with other physical parameters of the fraction API gravity and viscosity API gravity and flash point API gravity and aniline point flash point and refractive index. [Pg.76]

SEC data for the unknown polydisperse sample can then be obtained on the same instrument using the same solvent and temperature in other words we measure V. and determine Jr Then, as long as we know the values of the intrinsic viscosity parameters K and a for the unknown sample, the molecular weight distribution (the s) and the number... [Pg.389]


See other pages where Other Viscosity Parameters is mentioned: [Pg.180]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.125]   


SEARCH



Viscosity parameters

© 2024 chempedia.info